后冷战时期中—美—东盟的安全三边关系探略

发布时间：2018-05-12 17:45

本文选题：中-美-东盟 + 安全　；参考：《上海师范大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来随着美国高调介入中国与东盟南海争端,东亚地区安全局势越发紧张。本文企图把亚太地区的三个主要力量中-美-东盟纳入三边体系并阐释行为体在体系中的互动状况,旨在解决安全三边互动中不平衡与不稳定的现状,从而塑造一个稳定而又和平的亚太安全格局。本文在梳理中-美-东盟安全三边关系历史演变的基础上,侧重分析了三边结构、各边利益判断、安全机制对于安全三边发展的影响,指出了当前安全关系互动存在的相关制约性问题,并就如何解决这些问题从而实现良性互动提出了对策与建议。本文的主要内容是第三、四、五部分,其中第四、第五部分为重点。第三章用历史研究的方法梳理了从冷战开始到冷战结束期间安全三边关系的形成过程,并且把这一过程划分为70年代的初步缓和期以及柬埔寨危机中的互动形成期,指出了这一形成过程是冷战后安全三边互动的前提和铺垫。第四章运用了国际关系理论相结合的多重研究视角分析冷战后安全三边互动发展之过程,分别以结构层面、个体层面、安全机制层面为视角准确反映出安全三边的合作与竞争。结构层面通过对三边力量分配的结构性描述来阐述各边行为必须遵循结构体系的制约性原则,个体层面通过对各边的安全利益分析为起点来描述和展现安全三边互动,安全机制层面则以亚太地区的安全机制为平台来补充阐释安全三边关系的互动。在此基础总结出中-美-东盟安全三边关系的特点为开放性的不稳定安全三边、安全互动选择多为合作安全与综合安全、系统内安全互动的不对称性以及三对双边安全关系的连动性迟钝。第五章分析了当前安全三边关系存在着各边文化差异性、东盟一体化程度不高、国际体系的结构性制约、领导人的因素、经济与能源的制约以及南中国海和台湾问题等制约因素,指出了要使中-美-东盟安全三边关系进入良性互动的轨迹,应该以平衡现有的中-美-东盟的安全三边关系为逻辑起点,缓和与消解安全三边中的利益分歧的同时培育和发展共同的安全利益基础,最终使中-美-东盟安全三边关系走向建设性的三边关系。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the security situation in East Asia has become more and more tense as the United States has been involved in the South China Sea dispute between China and ASEAN. This paper attempts to bring the three major forces in the Asia-Pacific region, the United States and ASEAN, into the trilateral system and to explain the interaction of actors in the system, in order to resolve the imbalance and instability in the security trilateral interaction. So as to shape a stable and peaceful Asia-Pacific security pattern. On the basis of combing the historical evolution of the security trilateral relationship between China, the United States and ASEAN, this paper focuses on the analysis of the trilateral structure, the judgment of the interests of each side, and the influence of the security mechanism on the development of the trilateral security. This paper points out the restrictive problems existing in the interaction of security relations, and puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions on how to solve these problems so as to realize benign interaction. The main content of this paper is the third, fourth and fifth parts, among which the fourth part and the fifth part are the emphases. The third chapter combs the forming process of the security trilateral relationship from the beginning of the cold war to the end of the cold war with the method of historical research, and divides this process into the initial detente period in the 1970s and the interactive forming period in the Cambodia crisis. It is pointed out that this formation process is the premise and foundation of security trilateral interaction after the cold war. The fourth chapter analyzes the process of security trilateral interaction after the Cold War from the perspective of multiple studies combined with the theory of international relations. It accurately reflects the security trilateral cooperation and competition from the perspective of structure level, individual level and security mechanism level. Through the structural description of the distribution of the trilateral forces, the structural level states that the behavior of each side must follow the restrictive principle of the structural system, and the individual level describes and displays the trilateral interaction of the security through the analysis of the security interests of each side as the starting point. At the level of security mechanism, the security mechanism of the Asia-Pacific region is used as a platform to supplement and explain the interaction of the security trilateral relations. On this basis, it is concluded that the characteristics of the security trilateral relationship between China, the United States and ASEAN are open and unstable security trilateral, and the choice of security interaction is mostly cooperative security and comprehensive security. The asymmetry of security interaction within the system and the insensitivity of three pairs of bilateral security relations. The fifth chapter analyzes the cultural differences in the current security trilateral relations, the low degree of ASEAN integration, the structural constraints of the international system, and the factors of the leaders. Economic and energy constraints, the South China Sea and the Taiwan issue, etc., point out that the China-U.S.-ASEAN security trilateral relationship should enter the path of benign interaction. The logical starting point should be to balance the existing security trilateral relations between China, the United States and ASEAN, so as to ease and resolve the differences of interests among the three sides of security and at the same time foster and develop a common security interest base. Finally, the security trilateral relationship of Sino-u. S.-ASEAN moves towards a constructive trilateral relationship.
【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D829

【参考文献】