金砖国家与“保护的责任”

发布时间：2018-05-14 12:04

本文选题：金砖国家 + 保护的责任　；参考：《外交评论(外交学院学报)》2015年01期

【摘要】："保护的责任"与金砖国家的兴起是当前国际秩序变动的重要表征。金砖国家在"保护的责任"理念的发展过程中发挥了不容忽视的作用。金砖国家对"保护的责任"有自己的理解,特别是对第三个支柱中的强制性干预持怀疑态度。金砖国家对规范建设的审慎参与促成了"保护的责任"的稳妥发展与适当调整。同时,在叙利亚危机等问题上,金砖国家的立场也存在微妙差异。中俄对于制裁及强制手段的反对更为明确,而印度、巴西和南非的态度则相对灵活。这是由各国不同的秩序理念、现实诉求以及外交能力所决定的。金砖国家对"保护的责任"与国际强制干预的保留态度还将继续,但不应将其简单视作阻力,巴西提出"保护过程中的责任"等努力显示,金砖国家有可能在"保护的责任"的演进中扮演更为积极主动的角色。
[Abstract]:The responsibility to protect and the rise of the BRICS are important signs of the current changes in the international order. The BRICS countries have played an important role in the development of the concept of R2P. The BRICS have their own understanding of the responsibility to protect, and in particular are sceptical of mandatory intervention in the third pillar. The prudent participation of BRICS countries in normative building has contributed to the sound development and proper adjustment of R2P. At the same time, on issues such as the crisis in Syria, there are subtle differences in the position of the BRICS. China and Russia oppose sanctions and coercion more clearly, while India, Brazil and South Africa are relatively flexible. This is determined by the different order ideas, realistic demands and diplomatic ability of different countries. The BRICS reservations on the responsibility to protect and international coercive intervention will continue, but they should not be seen simply as resistance, as shown by Brazil's efforts to propose "responsibility in the process of protection". The BRICS are likely to play a more proactive role in the evolution of R2P.
【作者单位】：上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院;
【基金】：上海市哲学社会科学规划青年课题“中国参与国际人道主义干预规范塑造的对策研究”(课题批准号:2013EGJ001) 上海市教委2013年度“晨光计划”项目“国际人道主义干预规范变迁机制与中国对策研究”(项目编号:13CG14) “上海交通大学文科科研创新基金青年项目”(项目编号:12QN13)的支持
【分类号】：D814.1

【相似文献】