反思朝贡体系的安全功能:内涵、制度与实践

发布时间：2018-05-26 15:13

本文选题：朝贡体系 + 国家安全　；参考：《南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学)》2017年02期

【摘要】：历史上的朝贡体系作为一种综合性国家间关系框架,并非完美安排,它在功能设计和具体运行上均存在重大缺陷,尤其在安全方面。本文以朝贡国家对中原王朝的安全护卫功能为切入点,系统梳理朝贡体系的安全理念、安全内涵与安全机制,从“不犯边”与“守在四夷”两个方面来检验朝贡国家对其安全护卫功能的实践,并考察中原王朝对体系的认知与管理能力。在少数情况下,朝贡国家能谨守其藩属义务,保持对中原王朝的政治及军事臣服,履行其不犯边的承诺,并利用自身地缘条件及国家资源,为中原阻挡或延迟外部威胁。但朝贡体系本身的低约束力与非制度性,加上中原王朝对体系的认知偏差和松散管理,决定了它没有发展成一个被普遍认同且行之有效的国家周边安全制度安排。大多数时候,它在中原王朝面临重大安全威胁时形同虚设,甚至本身就构成中原王朝边疆危机的一部分。
[Abstract]:As a comprehensive framework of inter-state relations, the historical tributary system is not a perfect arrangement. It has great defects in function design and operation, especially in safety. Based on the security protection function of the tributary state to the Central Plains Dynasty, this paper systematically combs the security concept, the security connotation and the security mechanism of the tributary system. From the two aspects of "not violating the border" and "guarding on the four Yi", this paper examines the practice of the security guard function of the tributary state, and studies the cognition and management ability of the Central Plains Dynasty to the system. In a few cases, tributary countries can keep their vassal duties, keep their political and military obedience to the Central Plains Dynasty, fulfill their promise not to break the border, and use their own geographical conditions and national resources to block or delay external threats for the Central Plains. However, the low binding and non-institutional nature of the tributary system, coupled with the cognitive bias and loose management of the system by the Central Plains Dynasty, determined that it had not developed into a universally recognized and effective national security system arrangement. Most of the time, it was virtually empty when the Central Plains Dynasty faced a major security threat, and even formed part of the border crisis of the Central Plains Dynasty.
【作者单位】：兰州大学中亚研究所;兰州大学马克思主义学院;

【相似文献】