米尔斯海默中国威胁论批判

发布时间：2018-06-01 07:59

本文选题：中国威胁论 + 进攻性现实主义　；参考：《燕山大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着中国实力的不断强大，国际舞台上的中国威胁论更是愈演愈烈，并出现了多个版本。本文以近年来影响甚大的米尔斯海默的中国威胁论为研究对象，从其产生背景、理论基础和事实依据等角度进行了解读、分析和批判。米尔斯海默从进攻性现实主义的基本命题推导出：国际社会的无政府状态会导致大国之间的安全困境与零和搏弈，为了生存它们不得不最大限度地占有世界权力。按照这种“国强必霸”的逻辑，中国在崛起以后也将走上追求霸权之路。本文不同意米尔斯海默的推导和结论，并对其理论基础提出了质疑。本文认为：米尔斯海默在建构理论时并没有做到不偏不倚，他的许多论点存在“美国例外情节”；进攻性现实主义除存在忽视国家内部属性、简化权力等现实主义的一般弊病外，其核心要件、离岸平衡手战略、权力结构理论以及经验证据方面也存在着严重的缺陷；中国从来都不是米尔斯海默所言之“进攻性大国”，，中国的和平发展战略也非权宜之计；中国和美国这对崛起国和霸权国或可超越米尔斯海默所言之“大国政治的悲剧”。
[Abstract]:With the growing strength of China, the theory of China threat on the international stage is becoming more and more intense, and there are many versions. This paper takes Mills' theory of China threat, which has a great influence in recent years, as the object of study, and analyzes and criticizes it from the angles of its background, theoretical basis and factual basis. From the basic proposition of offensive realism, Mills deduced that the anarchy of the international community would lead to the security dilemma and the zero-sum game among the great powers, and they had to occupy the world power to the maximum extent in order to survive. According to this logic, China will pursue hegemony after its rise. This paper disagrees with the derivation and conclusion of Mills and questions its theoretical basis. In this paper, it is concluded that Mills has not been impartial in his theory of construction, that there are "American exceptional circumstances" in many of his arguments, and that offensive realism, in addition to neglecting the internal attributes of the state, In addition to the general drawbacks of realism such as simplifying power, its core elements, the strategy of offshore balance, the theory of power structure and empirical evidence, also have serious shortcomings. China has never been what Mills called "an offensive power." China's peaceful development strategy is also not an expedient measure; China and the United States, the rising and hegemonic powers, may transcend Mills's "tragedy of great power politics".
【学位授予单位】：燕山大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D820

【相似文献】