战后中日关系的“钓鱼岛问题”史——知识生产与传播战略再思考

发布时间：2018-06-10 13:31

本文选题：中日关系 + 战后处理　；参考：《开放时代》2015年04期

【摘要】：追求"世代友好"的中日关系终因"钓鱼岛问题"陷入准断交危机,颠覆了观念先行的伟人崇拜外交学叙事。以"问题史"知识生产取代政治意识形态想象和战略空论,发现"钓鱼岛问题"作为战后处理的国际法体系缺陷规定着结构性的可持续冷战,认识和解进程与国际秩序转型之间的历史逻辑,才能明确在国际传播主体性和外交能力重建前提下化解危机的方向感。战后初期,日本以中国名称体系向盟军呈交钓鱼岛,默认中国权益,直到日美交涉琉球返还才试图重占,受到中国抗议才虚构"固有领土论";其后经中日邦交正常化达成"搁置争议"共识,但日本无意信守而利用和平友好条约谈判修复"固有领土论"立场并尝试实际占据——虽然在中国交涉下恢复了"无人岛"原状,却是无解化的开始。中日关系危险地纠结于战后处理的民族主义原点,领土问题的条约交涉不能再拖延。
[Abstract]:The relationship between China and Japan in pursuit of "friendship from generation to generation" eventually fell into a quasi-breakage crisis because of the Diaoyu Island issue, which overturned the diplomatic narrative of worship of the great man who had the idea in the first place. Replacing political ideology imagination and strategic empty theory with knowledge production of "problem history", it is found that "Diaoyu Island" as a defect of international law system dealt with after the war stipulates a structural sustainable cold war. Only by understanding the historical logic between the process of reconciliation and the transformation of international order can we make clear the sense of direction in resolving the crisis under the premise of the reconstruction of international communication subjectivity and diplomatic ability. In the early postwar period, Japan submitted the Diaoyu Islands to the allies under the Chinese name system, acquiescing to Chinese rights and interests, and did not attempt to reoccupy them until Japan and the United States negotiated the return of Ryukyu. Only when China protested did it make up the "inherent territorial theory." after the normalization of diplomatic relations between China and Japan reached a consensus on "shelving disputes," However, Japan does not intend to abide by it and uses peace and friendship treaty negotiations to repair the position of "inherent territory" and try to actually occupy it-although the original status quo ante of "no man's island" has been restored under the Chinese negotiations, it is the beginning of unsolvability. Sino-Japanese relations are dangerously entangled in postwar nationalist origins, and treaty negotiations on territorial issues cannot be delayed any longer.
【作者单位】：中国传媒大学国际传播研究中心;
【分类号】：D822.331.3

【参考文献】