冷战后欧盟的冲突干预:以亚洲为例

发布时间：2018-06-14 22:14

本文选题：欧盟 + 冲突干预　；参考：《欧洲研究》2014年01期

【摘要】：冷战后,欧盟在亚洲地区进行的冲突干预行动具有以下特征:注重多边合作、谋求干预行动合法性与效果的最大化;多采用以某个成员国为主的"主导国模式",小国主导比例较高;强调民事领域的干预与战后重建,发展出"任务主导国模式"和"格鲁吉亚模式";超越传统的军事干预模式,以"军事危机管理"定位军事干预;干预行动在共同安全与防务政策框架下实施,并制定相应的政策文件和实施细则。欧盟干预行动的主要不足包括:各国立场不同影响了干预行动的决策和实施;欧盟和成员国的民事干预相关机构彼此协调不足,影响了行动效率,参与民事干预行动的人员不足,影响了行动效果。上述特征也多存在于欧洲对非洲的干预行动中。
[Abstract]:After the cold war, the EU's conflict intervention in the region of Asia has the following characteristics: focusing on multilateral cooperation, seeking the maximization of the legitimacy and effect of the intervention action; using a "dominant state model" as the main part of a member state, and the higher proportion of the small countries, emphasizing the civil domain intervention and post-war reconstruction, and developing the "task leading country model". And the "Georgian model"; beyond the traditional military intervention model, military intervention is located in the "military crisis management"; intervention is implemented under the framework of common security and defense policy, and the corresponding policy documents and implementation rules are formulated. The main shortcomings of the EU intervention include: the different positions of the countries affect the decision-making and reality of the intervention action. The lack of coordination of civil intervention related institutions in EU and member countries affects the efficiency of action, the lack of personnel involved in civil intervention and the effect of action. The above features are mostly in European intervention in Africa.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院世界经济与政治研究所;中国传媒大学国际关系研究所;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“欧盟对区域外暴力性民族冲突干预研究”(项目编号:10JJDGJW018)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D85

【参考文献】