论中印反恐合作

发布时间：2018-06-21 09:44

本文选题：反恐合作 + 功能主义　；参考：《上海师范大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：国际安全问题主要分为传统安全问题和非传统安全问题。传统安全主要指的是以国家为主体的安全,安全的内容局限于军事和政治领域,涉及的都是敏感的国家主权、领土完整等核心利益问题,传统安全范式使国家之间面临着“零和博弈”和“安全困境”的结构性难题,这正是中国与印度之间难以形成关于安全的共同认知和共同利益的关键所在,更遑论“我们感”和集体身份的构建了。而由于非传统安全来源的不确定性和行为体的多样化,需要参与合作的主体将更为多元化,合作层次和合作方式也更为灵活多样,双方容易达成一致立场和看法,有利于促进地区性身份认同的构建和“我们感”的形成。冷战后非传统安全问题的凸显在一定程度上改变了中国和印度之间在传统安全语境下的“零和博弈”和安全困境的关系态势,缓和了冷战局势和边境争端在那里造成的紧张气氛。由于中印双方都面临着恐怖主义威胁的现实问题,对恐怖主义的危害有着相当大的共识,双方在反恐合作领域基本上没有原则上的分歧,中印双方都有良好的解决问题的意愿,可以建立稳定有效的合作应对机制,中印在反恐合作领域大有可为。可以说,恐怖主义问题为调整和改善中印关系、转变安全观念、推动周边外交提供了契机。通过推动反恐合作进程,中印双方有望在此过程中发展出相互信赖、相互依存的安全观,并对双方的国家安全和国际利益进行重新的界定和认识,将非传统安全合作所形成的信任、友好“外溢”到传统安全领域,以“低级政治”推动“高级政治”的发展。习惯和规范在对话协商和互动性的社会化过程中被孕育并得以产生。
[Abstract]:International security issues are mainly divided into traditional security issues and non-traditional security issues. Traditional security mainly refers to security with the state as the main body. The content of security is limited to the military and political fields, and involves sensitive national sovereignty, territorial integrity and other core interest issues. The traditional security paradigm poses a structural problem of "zero-sum games" and "security dilemmas" between countries, which is the key to the difficulty of forming a common understanding and common interests on security between China and India. Not to mention the "sense of us" and the construction of collective identity. Due to the uncertainty of non-traditional security sources and the diversification of actors, the subjects who need to participate in cooperation will be more diversified, the cooperation levels and modes will be more flexible and diverse, and it is easy for both sides to reach an agreed position and view. It helps to promote the construction of regional identity and the formation of "our sense". The emergence of non-traditional security issues after the Cold War has to some extent changed the "zero-sum game" and the security dilemma between China and India in the traditional security context. It eased tensions over the cold war and border disputes. Because both China and India are facing the realistic problem of terrorist threat and have a considerable consensus on the harm of terrorism, there is basically no difference in principle between the two sides in the field of counter-terrorism cooperation. Both China and India have a good will to resolve the problem. A stable and effective cooperative response mechanism can be established, and China and India can do a lot in the field of anti-terrorism cooperation. It can be said that terrorism provides an opportunity for adjusting and improving Sino-Indian relations, changing security concepts and promoting peripheral diplomacy. By promoting the process of counter-terrorism cooperation, China and India are expected to develop a concept of mutual trust and interdependence in this process, and to redefine and understand the national security and international interests of both sides. The trust formed by non-traditional security cooperation is transferred to the traditional security field, and the development of "high politics" is promoted by "lower politics". Habits and norms are conceived and produced in the process of dialogue, negotiation and interactive socialization.
【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D815.5

【参考文献】