“宗主权”与传统藩属体系的解体——从“宗藩关系”一词的来源谈起

发布时间：2018-06-25 08:53

本文选题：宗主权 + 宗主国　；参考：《中国边疆史地研究》2017年01期

【摘要】：文章追溯了"宗主权"一词中文翻译的出现过程,指出该词是伴随着日本国际法著述的引入,出现于清末,进而认为中国传统藩属体系与近代西方国际法宗主国—属国关系体制不同,后者代表了当时国际社会强势规则,清朝传统藩属体系在进入国际社会时,不得不受其挑战而进行调适。在这一过程中,由于清朝对"宗主权"认识迟钝、国力衰弱、列强侵占等因素,无法最终依据当时西方国际法规范对与越南、朝鲜等国的传统藩属关系进行重新确立,而传统藩属体系逐渐被解体。当"宗主权"、"宗主国"等词语进入中文成为固定的术语时,后世学人开始用这些词语重新书写历史,由此产生了"宗藩关系"等词语。
[Abstract]:This paper traces the emergence of the Chinese translation of the term "Zong Sovereign", and points out that it appeared in the late Qing Dynasty with the introduction of Japanese international law works. It is further considered that Chinese traditional vassal system is different from modern western international law suzerain-state relationship system, which represents the strong rules of the international community at that time. When the Qing Dynasty traditional vassal system entered the international society, It has to be challenged to adapt. In this process, due to the factors such as the Qing Dynasty's slow understanding of "patriarchal sovereignty", weak national strength and encroachment by the powers, it was impossible to reestablish the traditional subordinate relations with Vietnam, Korea and other countries according to the western norms of international law at that time. The traditional vassal system was gradually disintegrated. When the words such as "patriarchal sovereignty" and "sovereign state" came into Chinese as fixed terms, later scholars began to use these words to rewrite history, resulting in words such as "suzerain-vassal relationship" and so on.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院中国边疆研究所;
【分类号】：D829

【相似文献】