西方国家对“保护的责任”的选择性适用:影响因素与案例分析

发布时间：2018-06-25 17:05

本文选题：保护的责任 + 利比亚　；参考：《欧洲研究》2014年05期

【摘要】：对于利比亚和叙利亚内战,以美、英、法为首的西方国家的反应有所不同。针对利比亚内战,西方国家以"保护的责任"的名义对利比亚进行了武装干涉;然而,对于叙利亚,西方国家并未对其适用"保护的责任"。为什么西方国家将"保护的责任"适用于利比亚而没有适用于叙利亚?本文认为,西方国家是否对发生内战的国家适用"保护的责任"取决于两个因素:预期干预成本与收益的比较以及干预能否获得国际社会的支持。前者涉及西方国家进行军事干预前的内部决策,后者涉及干预能否获得安理会的授权。只有在干预收益超过干预成本时,西方国家才会有干预的意愿;在有了干预的意愿之后,如果干预还能获得支持,西方国家对内战发生国适用"保护的责任"就获得了所谓的"正当性"。
[Abstract]:The western countries, headed by the United States, Britain and France, have different reactions to the civil war in Libya and Syria. In the name of the civil war in Libya, the western countries armed intervention in Libya in the name of "the responsibility of protection"; however, for Syria, the western countries did not apply the "responsibility for protection" for the western countries. Why western countries "the responsibility of protection" "Applicable to Libya and not for Syria? This article believes that the responsibility of the western countries to protect the civil war depends on two factors: the comparison of the expected cost of intervention and the benefit of the intervention and the support of the intervention of the international community. The former involves internal decision-making before military intervention by the Western countries, and the latter involves the latter. Whether or not the intervention will be authorized by the Security Council. Only when the intervention costs exceed the intervention costs will the western countries have the willingness to intervene; after the willingness of intervention, if the intervention can also be supported, the "responsibility for protection" of the western countries will be justified by the "responsibility for protection" for the countries of the civil war.
【作者单位】：兰州大学中亚研究所;澳门大学社会科学学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“中东国家的社会变迁与社会运动研究”(项目批准号为13XGJ001)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D81

【参考文献】