冷战后北约的战略调整对俄罗斯的影响
发布时间：2018-07-14 17:28
【摘要】：北约的战略调整脱胎于美苏争霸、冷战对峙时代的结束。从20世纪90年初开始,在其发展的二十年间,北约以一种甚为积极的姿态活跃在风云变幻的国际舞台上。自冷战结束后,北约在美国的主导下,全面调整其对外安全战略与职能,从1991年的罗马会议到1999年的华盛顿会议,再到2010年的里斯本会议,历经三次的战略调整,竭力扩充并增加其影响力,逐步实现从欧洲化到全球化的战略扩张。北约的扩张并不仅仅是防御范围的扩大,更重要的是,在随着集体防御范围扩大的同时向第三世界国家等国家推广西方文化的民主价值观,并以这种理念为其东扩和军事干涉寻找理论支撑。 俄罗斯作为苏联帝国的最大继承体,无论是从地缘政治还是文化与历史上,都无法隔断与欧洲的千丝万缕的联系,北约的一举一动都会牵动俄罗斯这头“北极熊”的敏感神经。影响是无法避免的,但俄罗斯更应该做的是如何调整自身去消除这种影响,是避其锋芒还是迎着风浪主动靠上去,这都是新一代俄罗斯领导人必须经过深思熟虑之后面对的。 从冷战后初期的“一边倒”,到90年代中后期的“针锋相对”,再到新世纪的“务实灵活”,在与北约痛并快乐的纠缠了二十年、以及不断的摸索之后,俄罗斯学会了如何以一种更为实际的方式去与对手较量来保存和壮大自己,这也注定了俄罗斯要继续与北约这个老冤家纠缠下去。
[Abstract]:NATO's strategic adjustment was born out of US-Soviet hegemony and the end of cold-war confrontation. From the beginning of the 20th century, in the 20 years of its development, NATO was active on the changing international stage with a very positive attitude. Since the end of the cold war, under the leadership of the United States, NATO has comprehensively adjusted its foreign security strategy and functions. From the Rome Conference in 1991 to the Washington Conference in 1999 and to the Lisbon Conference in 2010, NATO has undergone three strategic adjustments. Strive to expand and increase its influence and gradually realize the strategic expansion from Europeanization to globalization. NATO's expansion is not just an expansion of the scope of defense. More importantly, as the scope of collective defense expands, it promotes the democratic values of Western culture to third world countries and other countries. And to this concept for its eastward expansion and military intervention to find theoretical support. Russia, as the largest successor of the Soviet empire, can not separate its ties with Europe in geopolitics, culture and history, and NATO's every move will affect the sensitive nerve of Russia's polar bear. The impact is inevitable, but what Russia should do more is to adjust itself to eliminate it, to avoid its edge or to take the initiative, which the new generation of Russian leaders must face after careful consideration. From the "one-sided" period in the early post-cold war period to the "tit-for-tat" confrontation in the middle and late 1990s, and to the "pragmatic flexibility" of the new century, after two decades of painful and happy entanglement with NATO, and constant groping, Russia has learned how to fight its opponents in a more practical way to preserve and strengthen itself, and it is destined to continue to struggle with NATO's old foes.
【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D814.1;D851.2
本文编号：2122380
[Abstract]:NATO's strategic adjustment was born out of US-Soviet hegemony and the end of cold-war confrontation. From the beginning of the 20th century, in the 20 years of its development, NATO was active on the changing international stage with a very positive attitude. Since the end of the cold war, under the leadership of the United States, NATO has comprehensively adjusted its foreign security strategy and functions. From the Rome Conference in 1991 to the Washington Conference in 1999 and to the Lisbon Conference in 2010, NATO has undergone three strategic adjustments. Strive to expand and increase its influence and gradually realize the strategic expansion from Europeanization to globalization. NATO's expansion is not just an expansion of the scope of defense. More importantly, as the scope of collective defense expands, it promotes the democratic values of Western culture to third world countries and other countries. And to this concept for its eastward expansion and military intervention to find theoretical support. Russia, as the largest successor of the Soviet empire, can not separate its ties with Europe in geopolitics, culture and history, and NATO's every move will affect the sensitive nerve of Russia's polar bear. The impact is inevitable, but what Russia should do more is to adjust itself to eliminate it, to avoid its edge or to take the initiative, which the new generation of Russian leaders must face after careful consideration. From the "one-sided" period in the early post-cold war period to the "tit-for-tat" confrontation in the middle and late 1990s, and to the "pragmatic flexibility" of the new century, after two decades of painful and happy entanglement with NATO, and constant groping, Russia has learned how to fight its opponents in a more practical way to preserve and strengthen itself, and it is destined to continue to struggle with NATO's old foes.
【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D814.1;D851.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 乔木;多极化趋势不会改变[J];当代亚太;2002年06期
2 姜毅;俄罗斯与欧盟——新的合作伙伴[J];俄罗斯中亚东欧研究;2004年01期
3 许志新;“可控的民主”及其风险[J];俄罗斯中亚东欧研究;2005年05期
4 姜毅;普京的军事改革与强军计划[J];俄罗斯中亚东欧研究;2005年05期
5 胡尚哲;高永久;;美国的中亚和外高加索战略的演变[J];俄罗斯中亚东欧研究;2006年02期
6 王新俊;俄罗斯军事安全战略与军队建设[J];俄罗斯研究;2004年03期
7 王海滨;;试论俄军武器装备现代化[J];国际论坛;2007年04期
8 刘军;全球化背景下的俄罗斯国家定位[J];华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年03期
9 林跃勤;;俄罗斯经济改革与独联体发展前景——2002年秋季访俄报告[J];经济学动态;2003年01期
10 陆南泉;俄罗斯经济转轨若干重要问题研究[J];开放导报;2002年07期
，本文编号：2122380
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/2122380.html
