跨越制度边界的互动——国际制度与非成员国关系研究

发布时间：2018-07-16 23:07

【摘要】： 国际制度的出现改变了国际社会的版图,在成员国和非成员国之间树立起了无形的边界。探讨国际制度的社会作用,不仅需要考察它在何种程度上促进制度框架内成员国之间的合作,也需要讨论它在何种程度上推动成员国和非成员国之间跨越制度边界的互动。研究国际制度与非成员国的关系,实际上是把现有研究未予重视的经验事实纳入到理论分析的框架之中,因而具有重要的理论价值。为了确立起分析国际制度与非成员国关系的理论框架,本文首先讨论了国际制度对成员国和非成员国社会影响的差异。从国际制度的实际运行来看,一方面,成员国试图扩大制度规则的适用范围,并且会通过纳入新成员的方式提高组织机构的行动能力。另一方面,非成员国也希望通过接触国际制度实现如下目标:对国际制度构成的社会环境作出反应、分享国际制度在推进全球治理中带来的实际利益、以及取得国际社会的认同。当彼此有了交往的需要时,跨越制度边界的互动将成为可能。在讨论了跨界互动的起源之后,本文对跨界互动的规则基础进行了讨论。国际制度作为既成事实,不仅改变了国际社会的治理空白状态,也使得既定行为方式取得了一定的社会认可。在这个意义上,制度规则构成了跨界互动的规则基础。然而,国际制度对制度成员和非成员构成了不同社会约束。质言之,国际制度对成员国产生制度框架内的作用,而对非成员国的作用则通常以后者同意承受拘束为前提。因此,有必要分析驱使非成员国同意承受约束的社会因素。这里提出了国际制度和非成员国相互合法化的解释模式,一方面,非成员国在一定程度上接受制度宗旨;另一方面,国际制度也相应地纳入非成员国的重要关切。本文进一步指出,国际制度和非成员国的相互合法化,不是谁改变了谁的单向因果链条,而是双方协同演化的过程。在这一过程中,国际制度的“教学”作用固然是重要的一个方面,但是国际制度的“学习”功能也不容忽视。否则,制度先行者和后来者之间的冲突将变得不可调解,进而导致跨界互动的中断甚至终止。本文以六方会谈机制、英国入盟欧共体、印度与核不扩散体制关系为例,对上述机理进行了阐释。关于中国全面参与国际制度的提法,本文指出,深化参与已加入国际制度和扩大参与未加入国际制度是两个不同的范畴。处理好中国同未加入国际制度关系,不仅能为中国开辟新的外交场合,而且能带来更高的边际收益。论文就不同事务领域中国未加入国际制度的基本情况进行了考察,同时也结合出口控制领域的有关史实对中国与外部世界的相互合法化作了初步探讨。本文得出结论认为,相互合法化的程度对跨界互动的进程,以及跨界互动形成的结构都有重要影响。在国际关系研究中,讨论国际制度的社会作用,不仅要关注它如何推动了成员国之间的合作,还应该探讨它如何促进了非成员国和成员国的相互靠拢,直至非成员国改变身份成为制度成员。
[Abstract]:The emergence of the international system has changed the layout of the international community and set up an intangible boundary between the Member States and the non member states. To explore the social role of the international system, it is not only necessary to examine the extent to which it promotes cooperation among the member states within the institutional framework, but also to the extent to which it promotes member and non member states. It is of great theoretical value to study the relationship between the international system and the non member states, in fact, the empirical facts that have not been attached to the existing research into the framework of the theoretical analysis.
In order to establish a theoretical framework for the analysis of the relationship between the international system and the non member states, this paper first discusses the differences in the social impact of the international system on the members and non member countries. On the one hand, the member states try to expand the scope of the application of the rules of the system and increase the organization through the incorporation of new members. On the other hand, non member states also hope to achieve the following objectives through contact with the international system: to respond to the social environment formed by the international system, to share the practical interests of the international system in promoting global governance and to achieve the identity of the international community. The interaction will be possible.
After discussing the origin of cross boundary interaction, this paper discusses the rules foundation of cross boundary interaction. As a vested fact, international system has not only changed the state of the governance gap of the international community, but also made certain social recognition of the established behavior. In this sense, the rules of the system constitute the rule basis of cross boundary interaction. However, the international system constitutes a different social constraint on the members and non members of the system. In a word, the role of the international system in the framework of a member's home-made system, while the role of the non member state generally agrees to bear the constraint, is necessary. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the social factors that drive the non member states to accept constraints. On the one hand, non member countries accept the purpose of the system to a certain extent, and on the other hand, the international system has also included the important concerns of non member states.
This article further points out that the mutual legalization of the international system and the non member states is not the one who has changed the one-way chain of cause and effect, but the process of co evolution between the two sides. In this process, the "teaching" role of the international system is an important aspect, but the "learning" function of the international system can not be ignored. Otherwise, the system is first. The conflict between the traveler and the latecomer will become non conciliation, which leads to the interruption and even termination of cross-border interaction. This paper explains the mechanism of the six party talks, the British European Union, India and the nuclear non-proliferation system.
With regard to the formulation of China's full participation in the international system, this article points out that deepening participation in the international system and expanding participation in the non accession to the international system are two different categories. To deal with China's relations with no international system, not only can we open new diplomatic occasions for China, but also bring higher marginal revenue. The basic situation of China's failure to join the international system has been investigated, and a preliminary discussion is made on the mutual legalization of China and the outside world in the light of the historical facts of the field of export control.
The conclusion is that the degree of mutual legalization has an important impact on the process of cross-border interaction and the structure of cross-border interaction. In the study of international relations, the discussion of the social role of the international system is not only concerned with how it promotes cooperation among Member States, but also how it promotes non member states and members. The state will close together until the non member states change their identities to become members of the system.
【学位授予单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D80

【相似文献】