中欧关系的去集中化研究
发布时间：2018-07-21 18:28
【摘要】：本文通过希腊和16+1机制的两个案例研究回顾了欧债危机后中欧关系的去集中化。研究简要介绍了欧债危机前的中欧关系,并分析了两国的反应如何影响了他们的关系。此外,本文还探讨了中欧关系去集中化的影响以及在未来中欧关系的合作中可能实施的举措一,为中欧今后的合作提供了许多可能性。常规的研究重点是欧元区债务危机或中欧关系,而很少有学术作品正在试图找出欧元区债务危机如何影响中欧关系的问题的答案。本文试图能更好的理解这个问题。本文的主要论点是在欧元区的债务危机下,中欧关系是否更侧重于与成员国的双边关系。这种转变可以认为是中欧关系的去集中化。这两个研究问题是一般性的问题。权力下放是中欧关系的障碍吗?欧盟的外交政策未来如何更加集中化?还有两个问题更加具体。第一个问题是中国和欧盟在解决东欧国家和希腊的欧元区债务危机方面扮演了怎样的角色?第二个问题是中国和欧盟在解决东欧国家和希腊的欧元区债务危机方面发挥了什么作用?关于这两个问题的详细分析可以在讨论中希关系和16+1机制的两章中找到。之所以选择这两个案例的原因如下:希腊是欧元区债务危机的象征,且其对中国“一带一路”的倡议具有重要意义。中国提出了的16 + 1机制,由于这个机制,中东欧国家与中国的关系大为改善。这是一个对于欧盟来说十分重要的问题,因为欧盟不仅要应对金融危机,还要应对意识形态问题。如果双边关系比中欧关系具有更大的意义,可能会导致这种关系的离散化。本文提出了如何改善中欧关系,避免进一步权力下放的可能办法。权力下放可能对中欧关系产生不利影响,且关系到符合双方加强2004年建立的全面战略伙伴关系的利益。本文的主要资料来源为欧盟和中国的官方政策文件、欧盟和中国机构的网站、网络资料和有关中欧关系的期刊文章。二手资料来源是专注于欧元区债务危机或中欧关系的学术文献。所引用的学术论文主要有朱莉亚·梅泽尔和贝塔·乌德瓦里所写的债务危机对中欧关系的影响以及汉斯·肯德尼尼所写的关于经济依赖如何破坏欧洲的外交政策一致性的政策简报。这项研究中所引用的最重要的学术文献之一是21世纪全球政治中的中国与欧洲:伙伴关系,竞争与共同进化。其章节对欧洲主权债务危机既来自欧洲也来自中国的主题提供了平衡性的观点。本文的论据支撑可以在欧盟和中国的政策文件中找到,但不是主要来源。最明显的证据是中国和中东欧国家之间不断增加的贸易。中希关系也是如此。本文的研究成果如下。未来的权力下放可能会成为一个障碍,并对中欧关系造成负面影响,这意味着双边关系的进展放缓。欧盟成员国倾向于以自己的方式深化与中国的关系,因此在共同政策问题上达成共识可能会变得复杂化。欧盟应加强与成员国的沟通,强调欧盟外交政策中共同声音的重要性。考虑到以前欧盟激励其成员国的尝试方法是失败的,因此实现这项任务的成功是很难的。如果欧盟成员国和欧盟的经济形势总体上有所改善,中欧关系就会更密切。欧盟内部出口和进口的下降减少了其对外国投资者和资本的依赖。中国和欧盟对欧元区债务危机的反应截然不同。中国明确表示愿意帮助,但强调,主要是由欧盟来解决自身经济问题。由于欧盟的预算有限,欧盟条约缺乏立法支持,欧盟没有多少方法来帮助会员国克服经济问题。许多成员国已经找到解决增加公共债务的办法,寻找欧盟以外的贸易伙伴重启经济,而中国正是这样一个完美的候选人。许多事实证明,希腊是中欧关系的坚定支持者。但是,由于希腊经济援助的条件,三驾马车地区的最新发展引发了紧张局势。一方面,由于欧盟更加紧缩的措施,另一方面,来自中国的更强有力的经济支持,希腊可能会改变对欧盟的看法。权力下放的另一个来源是16+1机制。为了向欧盟表明16+1机制不是威胁,中国邀请欧盟代表参加每一个峰会,并在最后声明中加入条款,会议期间商定的一切都符合欧盟法规。但欧盟很少表达对这一机制的看法。中国与会员国双边关系的日益重要意味着对欧盟外交政策的关注较少。欧盟需要其所有成员的支持来改善其状况,但直到欧盟解决自己的内部问题这种情况才会发生。因此,中欧战略伙伴关系的进展可能会放缓,未来也可能会失去其重要性。中国的一带一路倡议和欧盟的“欧洲投资计划”为中欧关系提供了良机。这些举措的成功合作和共同成就意味着中欧关系可能加强。中欧战略伙伴关系发展的方式有三种:减少,停滞或改善。基于进行的研究,最有可能出现的是第二种情况。
[Abstract]:This paper reviews the centralization of Sino EU relations after the European debt crisis through two case studies of the Greek and 16+1 mechanisms. The study briefly introduces the Sino EU relations before the European debt crisis and analyzes how the two countries' reaction affects their relations. In addition, this paper also discusses the impact of the centralization of China EU relations and the future EU relations. The possible initiatives in cooperation provide many possibilities for China EU cooperation in the future. The regular research focuses on the euro zone debt crisis or China EU relations, while few academic works are trying to find out how the euro zone debt crisis affects China EU relations. This article tries to better understand this issue. The main point of this article is whether China EU relations are more focused on the bilateral relations with the member countries under the debt crisis in the euro zone. This change can be considered to be the centralization of China EU relations. The two research issues are general issues. Is power decentralization a barrier to China EU relations? How is the future of EU foreign policy more concentrated? Two questions are more specific. The first one is what role China and the EU play in solving the euro zone debt crisis in Eastern European countries and Greece? The second question is what role China and the EU play in solving the euro zone debt crisis in Eastern European countries and Greece, and the detailed points on these two issues. The analysis can be found in the two chapters of the Sino Greek relationship and the 16+1 mechanism. The reasons for choosing these two cases are as follows: Greece is a symbol of the euro zone debt crisis and it is of great significance to the initiative of China's "along the road". The 16 + 1 mechanism proposed by China, because of this mechanism, has a great relationship with China. This is a very important issue for the European Union, because the EU is not only responding to the financial crisis but also the ideological problem. If bilateral relations are more significant than China EU relations, it may lead to the discretization of this relationship. This article puts forward how to improve China EU relations and avoid further decentralization. Power decentralization may have a negative impact on China EU relations, and it is related to the interests of the comprehensive strategic partnership established by the two sides in 2004. The main sources of this paper are the official policy documents of the EU and China, the website of the EU and China institutions, the network materials and the periodicals on China EU relations. The source is the academic literature focused on the euro zone debt crisis or Sino European relations. The academic papers cited mainly include the impact of the debt crisis written by Julia Maer and Berta Udvari on China EU relations and the policy Hans Kendy wrote about how economic dependence destroys European foreign policy consistency. One of the most important academic documents cited in this study is the twenty-first Century global politics of China and Europe: partnership, competition and co evolution. The chapter provides a balanced view on the European sovereign debt crisis both from Europe and China. The most obvious evidence is the growing trade between China and central and Eastern European countries. This is the same. The results of this paper are as follows. Future power decentralization may become an obstacle and a negative impact on China EU relations, which means that the progress of bilateral relations is slowing. The member states tend to deepen their relations with China in their own way, so the consensus on common policy may become complicated. The EU should strengthen communication with its member countries and emphasize the importance of the common voice in the EU's foreign policy. The success of the task is difficult. If the economic situation of EU member countries and the EU has improved in general, China EU relations will be closer. The decline in EU internal exports and imports reduces its dependence on foreign investors and capital. China and the EU have a distinct response to the euro zone debt crisis. China is clearly willing to help. But it emphasizes, mainly by the European Union, to solve its own economic problems. As the EU has limited budgets, the EU treaty lacks legislative support and the EU has little ways to help member countries overcome the economic problems. Many members have found solutions to increase public debt and seek to reopen the economy outside the EU's trading partners, and China is in the right place. It is such a perfect candidate. Many facts have proved that Greece is a strong supporter of China EU relations. But, due to the conditions of the Greek economic aid, the latest developments in the three carriages area have caused tension. On the one hand, because of the tightening measures of the European Union, on the other hand, the stronger economic support from China, Greece can be more powerful. The 16+1 mechanism is another source of decentralization. In order to show the EU that the 16+1 mechanism is not a threat, China invites the EU representatives to participate in each summit and to join the terms in the final statement. All the agreements agreed during the meeting are in accordance with the EU regulations. But the EU rarely expresses its views on this mechanism. The growing importance of bilateral relations with Member States means less attention to the EU's foreign policy. The EU needs the support of all its members to improve its situation, but it will not happen until the EU solves its own internal problems. Therefore, the progress of the Sino EU strategic partnership may slow down and may lose its importance in the future. China's regional initiative and the European investment plan of the EU provide a good opportunity for China EU relations. The successful cooperation and common achievements of these initiatives mean that China EU relations may be strengthened. There are three ways of developing China EU strategic partnership: reduction, stagnation or improvement. The most likely research is second. The situation.
【学位授予单位】：上海外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D822.35
本文编号：2136427
[Abstract]:This paper reviews the centralization of Sino EU relations after the European debt crisis through two case studies of the Greek and 16+1 mechanisms. The study briefly introduces the Sino EU relations before the European debt crisis and analyzes how the two countries' reaction affects their relations. In addition, this paper also discusses the impact of the centralization of China EU relations and the future EU relations. The possible initiatives in cooperation provide many possibilities for China EU cooperation in the future. The regular research focuses on the euro zone debt crisis or China EU relations, while few academic works are trying to find out how the euro zone debt crisis affects China EU relations. This article tries to better understand this issue. The main point of this article is whether China EU relations are more focused on the bilateral relations with the member countries under the debt crisis in the euro zone. This change can be considered to be the centralization of China EU relations. The two research issues are general issues. Is power decentralization a barrier to China EU relations? How is the future of EU foreign policy more concentrated? Two questions are more specific. The first one is what role China and the EU play in solving the euro zone debt crisis in Eastern European countries and Greece? The second question is what role China and the EU play in solving the euro zone debt crisis in Eastern European countries and Greece, and the detailed points on these two issues. The analysis can be found in the two chapters of the Sino Greek relationship and the 16+1 mechanism. The reasons for choosing these two cases are as follows: Greece is a symbol of the euro zone debt crisis and it is of great significance to the initiative of China's "along the road". The 16 + 1 mechanism proposed by China, because of this mechanism, has a great relationship with China. This is a very important issue for the European Union, because the EU is not only responding to the financial crisis but also the ideological problem. If bilateral relations are more significant than China EU relations, it may lead to the discretization of this relationship. This article puts forward how to improve China EU relations and avoid further decentralization. Power decentralization may have a negative impact on China EU relations, and it is related to the interests of the comprehensive strategic partnership established by the two sides in 2004. The main sources of this paper are the official policy documents of the EU and China, the website of the EU and China institutions, the network materials and the periodicals on China EU relations. The source is the academic literature focused on the euro zone debt crisis or Sino European relations. The academic papers cited mainly include the impact of the debt crisis written by Julia Maer and Berta Udvari on China EU relations and the policy Hans Kendy wrote about how economic dependence destroys European foreign policy consistency. One of the most important academic documents cited in this study is the twenty-first Century global politics of China and Europe: partnership, competition and co evolution. The chapter provides a balanced view on the European sovereign debt crisis both from Europe and China. The most obvious evidence is the growing trade between China and central and Eastern European countries. This is the same. The results of this paper are as follows. Future power decentralization may become an obstacle and a negative impact on China EU relations, which means that the progress of bilateral relations is slowing. The member states tend to deepen their relations with China in their own way, so the consensus on common policy may become complicated. The EU should strengthen communication with its member countries and emphasize the importance of the common voice in the EU's foreign policy. The success of the task is difficult. If the economic situation of EU member countries and the EU has improved in general, China EU relations will be closer. The decline in EU internal exports and imports reduces its dependence on foreign investors and capital. China and the EU have a distinct response to the euro zone debt crisis. China is clearly willing to help. But it emphasizes, mainly by the European Union, to solve its own economic problems. As the EU has limited budgets, the EU treaty lacks legislative support and the EU has little ways to help member countries overcome the economic problems. Many members have found solutions to increase public debt and seek to reopen the economy outside the EU's trading partners, and China is in the right place. It is such a perfect candidate. Many facts have proved that Greece is a strong supporter of China EU relations. But, due to the conditions of the Greek economic aid, the latest developments in the three carriages area have caused tension. On the one hand, because of the tightening measures of the European Union, on the other hand, the stronger economic support from China, Greece can be more powerful. The 16+1 mechanism is another source of decentralization. In order to show the EU that the 16+1 mechanism is not a threat, China invites the EU representatives to participate in each summit and to join the terms in the final statement. All the agreements agreed during the meeting are in accordance with the EU regulations. But the EU rarely expresses its views on this mechanism. The growing importance of bilateral relations with Member States means less attention to the EU's foreign policy. The EU needs the support of all its members to improve its situation, but it will not happen until the EU solves its own internal problems. Therefore, the progress of the Sino EU strategic partnership may slow down and may lose its importance in the future. China's regional initiative and the European investment plan of the EU provide a good opportunity for China EU relations. The successful cooperation and common achievements of these initiatives mean that China EU relations may be strengthened. There are three ways of developing China EU strategic partnership: reduction, stagnation or improvement. The most likely research is second. The situation.
【学位授予单位】：上海外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D822.35
【参考文献】
中国期刊全文数据库 前2条
1 Loh Su Hsing;;A New Phase for Sino-EU Economic Ties[J];Beijing Review;2012年09期
2 罗传健;;欧洲主权债务危机及其对中欧贸易的影响研究[J];国际贸易问题;2011年12期
，本文编号：2136427
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/2136427.html
