反恐审讯及口供的适用

发布时间：2018-07-22 10:44

【摘要】：在依法惩治暴力恐怖犯罪案件过程中,审讯的意义重大。鉴于暴力恐怖犯罪的特殊性,各国的立法和实践认可审讯嫌疑人时可采取诸多特别措施,包括一些有损人格、有害健康甚至是达到酷刑标准的手段,但从实践看,并未达到预期效果。历史和实践证明,审讯中使用酷刑不仅增加反恐的道德成本,在诉讼上也难以奏效。在应对暴力恐怖犯罪时,应创设特殊的法律机制,适当放宽审讯方法的限制,同时在口供的证明力评判和证据资格审查上设置特殊的证据法规则。
[Abstract]:In the process of punishing crimes of violence and terrorism according to law, the trial is of great significance. In view of the particularity of the crime of violent terrorism, the legislation and practice of States may adopt a number of special measures when approving the interrogation of suspects, including some means that are degrading to the personality, harmful to health or even meet the standards of torture, but from a practical point of view, Did not achieve the desired results. History and practice have proved that the use of torture in interrogation not only increases the moral cost of terrorism, but also fails in litigation. When dealing with violent terrorist crimes, special legal mechanism should be created, the restrictions of interrogation methods should be relaxed appropriately, and special rules of evidence law should be set up in the judgment of testifying power and the examination of evidence qualification.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学;
【基金】：重庆高校创新团队建设计划资助项目(项目编号:KJTD201301) 重庆市社科规划培育项目“恐怖主义犯罪立体化对策研究”(项目编号:2013PYPX13)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D815.5

【相似文献】