论穆斯林联盟的不干涉土邦政策

发布时间：2018-08-07 17:02

【摘要】：印巴分治实际上包含两方面的领土划分:一是英属印度的分割,二是众多土邦的归属。无论《蒙巴顿宣言》,还是《印度独立法》都只对前者做出明确规定,而对后者却语焉不详、甚至有意回避。国大党和穆斯林联盟都希望把更多的领土划归各自的自治领。英属印度领土是英国殖民者按照宗教原则进行分割的,故两个自治领若想争取更多的领土,就只能在土邦的归属上展开争夺。对于土邦的归属问题,学者们多从国大党和英国殖民者的角度进行分析,而作为这一过程主要参与者之一的穆盟作用却没有得到应有的重视。本文主要研究穆盟的不干涉土邦政策及对土邦归属的影响,从而深化对土邦归属原因的认知和理解。
[Abstract]:The partition of India and Pakistan actually includes two aspects of territorial division: one is the division of British India and the other is the attribution of many indigenous states. Neither the Montbatton Declaration nor the Indian Independence Act explicitly defined the former, while the latter were vague and even evasive. Both the Congress Party and the Muslim League want more territory to be subsumed into their own dominion. British Indian territory is divided by British colonists according to religious principles, so if the two dominions want to fight for more territory, they can only compete over the attribution of the indigenous states. Scholars analyze the attribution of the indigenous state from the perspective of the Congress Party and the British colonists, but the role of the Muslim League, as one of the main participants in the process, has not received due attention. This paper mainly studies the policy of non-interference and its influence on the attribution of the upland, so as to deepen the cognition and understanding of the reasons for the attribution of the utopia.
【作者单位】：首都师范大学历史学院;
【基金】：山西大学人文社会科学科研基金(项目编号:0709055)的研究成果
【分类号】：D815

【相似文献】