东北亚多边安全合作构想方案研究

发布时间：2018-08-13 09:53

【摘要】： 东北亚地区可以说是地球上唯一的逆全世界脱冷战潮流之势而仍然处于冷战体制下的地区。该地区的多边安全合作自从20世纪90年代以来经相关各方共同努力已经取得了一定的成果,但是其合作的水平也只相当于20世纪60年代初欧盟进行多边安全合作时的初级阶段。之所以出现这种情况,主要是该地区国家间存在历史、领土问题、重视双边主义的倾向严重以及尚未充分认识到东北亚国家间共同面临的安全威胁等因素。虽有作为东北亚地区多边安全合作体制的政府范围的亚太地区论坛(ARF),但事实上,由于是在东盟的主导下运作,比起东北亚地区的安全问题,该机制更加重视东南亚地区的安全问题。民间范围内虽有合作体制的亚太安全合作理事会(CSCAP)和东北亚合作对话(NEACD)等,但是由于民间主导运作,合作的结果很难反映在各国的政策上。 21世纪,除朝鲜以外的周边国家均认识到了多边合作的重要性,展现出了积极的态度,各国认识到要实现东北亚多边合作,必须首先解决对东北亚稳定带来重大威胁的朝鲜核问题等在内的一系列朝鲜半岛问题。在这样的背景下,出现了作为解决朝鲜核问题的朝核问题六方会谈,该机制在解决影响创设东北亚地区的多边安全合作机制的阻碍因素,尤其在促使朝鲜参与进来、域内国家间多边安全合作经验积累等方面意义重大。同时,参与国家还共同认识到为解决东北亚和平还需要不断对域内安全问题进行持续协商讨论,并决定在“9.19共同声明”和“2.13协议”下,运作“东北亚和平安全体制实务小组”,使得今后东北亚多边安全合作机制的创设成为可能。充分利用朝鲜核问题六方会谈的推进力,分阶段推进,使得东北亚地区将来也能产生像欧盟安全合作机制(OSCE)一样的就东北亚国家间安全问题进行全盘讨论的“东北亚安全合作机制”。
[Abstract]:Northeast Asia can be said to be the only region on the earth that is still under the cold war system against the trend of the cold war. The multilateral security cooperation in the region has made some achievements since the 1990s, but the level of cooperation is only equivalent to the initial stage of EU multilateral security cooperation in the early 1960s. This is mainly due to the existence of history, territorial problems, the tendency to attach importance to bilateralism and the lack of full recognition of the common security threats among the countries in Northeast Asia. Although there is the Asia-Pacific region forum (ARF), which is the governmental framework for multilateral security cooperation in Northeast Asia, in fact, because it is operating under the leadership of ASEAN, compared with the security problems in Northeast Asia, The mechanism pays more attention to the security problems in Southeast Asia. Although the Asia-Pacific Security Cooperation Council (CSCAP) and the Northeast Asia Cooperation Dialogue (NEACD) have a cooperative system in the civilian sphere, the results of the cooperation can hardly be reflected in the policies of various countries in the 21st century because of the non-governmental operation. All neighbouring countries except the DPRK have recognized the importance of multilateral cooperation and have shown a positive attitude, and they have recognized the need to achieve multilateral cooperation in North-East Asia, We must first resolve a series of Korean Peninsula issues, including the Korean nuclear issue, which poses a major threat to the stability of Northeast Asia. Against this background, the six-party talks on the Korean nuclear issue as a solution to the North Korean nuclear issue have emerged. The mechanism is addressing the obstacles that affect the creation of a multilateral security cooperation mechanism in Northeast Asia, and in particular promoting the participation of the DPRK. The accumulation of experience in multilateral security cooperation among countries in the region is of great significance. At the same time, the participating countries also jointly recognized that peace in North-East Asia would require ongoing consultations and discussions on security issues in the region and decided, under the Joint statement of 9 / 19 and the Agreement 2.13, The operation of Northeast Asia Peace and Security system practice Group makes it possible to establish multilateral security cooperation mechanism in Northeast Asia in the future. Making full use of the propulsion power of the six-party talks on the North Korean nuclear issue and advancing in stages, In the future, Northeast Asia can also produce the "Northeast Asia Security Cooperation Mechanism", which is similar to the European Union Security Cooperation Mechanism (OSCE), which has a comprehensive discussion on the security issues among Northeast Asian countries.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D815.2

【相似文献】