论英国“退欧”进程中的条约法问题
发布时间：2018-08-14 08:39
【摘要】：无论国际组织章程条约是否规定退出机制,成员国的单边退出行为都会引发不同程度的关切。由《里斯本条约》引进的《欧盟条约》第50条结束了欧盟内部有关退出机制的长期争论,为英国"退欧"提供了相对明确的法律依据。因缺乏可资借鉴的先例,英国"退欧"所带来的法律上的不确定性在短期内无法消除。随着"退欧协定"谈判工作的展开,英国与欧盟早期在谈判路线方面的分歧日渐式微。但从谈判立场和缔约机制的角度来看,双方欲在预设期限内完成"退欧协定"的谈判和缔结工作,仍面临着潜在的法律障碍。对于包括中国在内的第三国而言,英国"退欧"在近期并不会对欧盟与第三国的条约关系造成重大冲击,只是在必要的情况下应考虑未来与英国重新缔结条约,以避免英国"退欧"后产生的法律真空。
[Abstract]:Regardless of whether the treaty of constitution of an international organization provides for a withdrawal mechanism, the unilateral withdrawal of a member State will cause varying degrees of concern. Article 50 of the EU Treaty, introduced by the Lisbon Treaty, has put an end to the long-standing debate on the exit mechanism within the EU and provided a relatively clear legal basis for Britain's "Brexit". In the absence of precedents, the legal uncertainty of Brexit cannot be eliminated in the short term. With the start of negotiations on the Brexit Agreement, the early differences between Britain and the European Union over the course of the talks have dwindled. However, from the point of view of negotiation position and treaty mechanism, the parties still face potential legal obstacles in order to complete the negotiation and conclusion of the Brexit Agreement within the preset period. For third countries, including China, Brexit from the EU will not have a major impact on treaty relations between the EU and third countries in the near future, but if necessary, it should consider reconcluding a treaty with Britain in the future. To avoid a legal vacuum after Brexit.
【作者单位】： 南京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D814.1;D856.1;D993.8
本文编号：2182271
[Abstract]:Regardless of whether the treaty of constitution of an international organization provides for a withdrawal mechanism, the unilateral withdrawal of a member State will cause varying degrees of concern. Article 50 of the EU Treaty, introduced by the Lisbon Treaty, has put an end to the long-standing debate on the exit mechanism within the EU and provided a relatively clear legal basis for Britain's "Brexit". In the absence of precedents, the legal uncertainty of Brexit cannot be eliminated in the short term. With the start of negotiations on the Brexit Agreement, the early differences between Britain and the European Union over the course of the talks have dwindled. However, from the point of view of negotiation position and treaty mechanism, the parties still face potential legal obstacles in order to complete the negotiation and conclusion of the Brexit Agreement within the preset period. For third countries, including China, Brexit from the EU will not have a major impact on treaty relations between the EU and third countries in the near future, but if necessary, it should consider reconcluding a treaty with Britain in the future. To avoid a legal vacuum after Brexit.
【作者单位】： 南京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D814.1;D856.1;D993.8
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 范明志;论欧盟法院的先行裁决[J];法学评论;2002年06期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 本报首席记者 郑若麟;法德轴心作用再次确认[N];文汇报;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 雷添崴;多层治理的欧盟气候政策[D];华东师范大学;2012年
，本文编号：2182271
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/2182271.html
