价值观外交研究：以近年来欧洲对华价值观外交为例

发布时间：2018-08-29 14:15

【摘要】：本文总结和评析了国内学界价值观外交研究现状,从理论概念上对价值观外交做出了界定；基于学界的研究,本文认为价值观与外交相互影响,文化价值观念在深层次上界定了外交决策中的可选项等决定因素,并通过不同的行为体以不同的方式作用于外交政策。本文以欧盟国家对华价值观外交为例,揭示了价值观与经济因素在中欧关系中相互交织,相互影响,可能成为中欧关系进一步发展的主要障碍。在分析了经济因素之后,文章梳理了西方价值观的渊源与发展脉络,进而深入比较了中欧文化价值观念的差异,揭示了中欧价值观冲突的精神内涵,说明了西方频频发动对华价值观外交的原因。另外,论文辩证分析了“普世价值”,既承认了西方某些价值对于全人类确有意义,对我们确有借鉴意义,又批驳了欧美一家说了算,妄图称霸价值伦理世界的“西方普世价值观”。论文指出了中国外交应对价值观外交的不足,即既缺乏核心价值观指导,又落后与国际形势和外交发展的新趋势；本文建议重建有广泛认同性的核心价值观,并重视公民社会和网络世界的力量,尽快适应外交发展的新变化,理性有效地维护中国的利益和国际形象。除绪论外,本文分为五章和结论。第一章是对中国学术界价值观外交研究现状的文献综述,分析概括了多位学者价值观外交概念,同时又对国内学者的研究关注点、研究观点进行了梳理和分析概括。第二章探讨文化价值观与外交之间的关系,即文化价值观怎样影响外交,以及外交对文化的反作用。本章首先讨论了文化价值观对外交的界定作用,通过分析文化价值观对不同的行为体的影响,即通过领导人、民众、团体组织等对外交决策产生不同的多角度的影响和作用,接着本章论述了价值观外交的决策模式,并尝试给出了多元行为体与价值观外交决策行为模式图。第三章相对简短,主要是对近年来欧中价值观外交进行了述评。本章首先对近年来欧盟国家对华价值观外交大事进行了简短回顾,在此基础上提出了在很多场合下不能将欧盟国家的对华攻击简单归为价值观外交,而是要认识到欧盟国家常用的两张牌“价值观外交”和“经济打压”往往交织在一起,相互影响,这种价值观外交在很大程度上只是其对华施加压力的一种外交工具。第四章是对价值观外交原因的深层探讨和分析。不可否认的是,欧洲人与中国人之间确实存在着价值观的差异和分歧,表现在中欧文化价值观的差异、对普世价值观的不同看法等方面。本章从价值观的一般概念出发,梳理了欧洲价值观的来源和发展历史,揭示了自由、民主、人权等价值对于西方的意义。接着,本章对中国和欧洲价值观进行了比较分析,一定程度上揭示了中欧价值观冲突的精神原因。本章最后部分辩证分析了“普世价值”,既承认了西方某些价值对于全人类确有意义和对我们的某种借鉴意义,又批驳了欧美企图垄断价值观话语权的“西方普世价值观”。第五章探讨的是中国应该怎样面对欧洲国家发动的价值观外交攻势,属于政策分析和政策建议。本章指出我国亟需一个为民众所认同且被世界接受的核心价值观,重建中国外交的灵魂以应对西方的伦理进攻。另外,中国外交要善用网络力量和社会力量,积极地开展中国网络外交,让国际社会在社会网络里认知中国,在社交网络里塑造中国国家形象。在结语部分,本文表达了对中国外交发展的忧虑,并进一步指出应密切研究国际政治的新发展和新情况,重视研究国际交往中的文化价值观等规范性因素和人的价值。
[Abstract]:This paper summarizes and analyzes the research status of value diplomacy in domestic academic circles, and defines value diplomacy theoretically. Based on the research in academic circles, this paper argues that values and diplomacy influence each other, and cultural values define the determinants of diplomatic decision-making in a deep level, such as alternatives, and through different actors. Taking the value diplomacy of EU countries toward China as an example, this paper reveals that values and economic factors intertwine and influence each other in Sino-European relations, which may become the main obstacles to the further development of Sino-European relations. In addition, the dissertation dialectically analyzes the "universal value", which recognizes that some Western values are meaningful to all mankind and can be used for reference by us. It also refutes a Western European universal values that has the final say that the United States and Europe want to dominate the world of value ethics. The paper points out the deficiency of China's diplomacy in coping with value diplomacy, that is, lacking the guidance of core values and lagging behind the new trend of international situation and diplomatic development. Attaching importance to the strength of civil society and the Internet world, adapting to the new changes in diplomatic development as soon as possible, and rationally and effectively safeguarding China's interests and international image.
In addition to the introduction, this paper is divided into five chapters and conclusions. The first chapter is a literature review of the research status of value diplomacy in China's academic circles.
The second chapter discusses the relationship between cultural values and diplomacy, that is, how cultural values influence diplomacy, and how diplomacy reacts to culture. Firstly, this chapter discusses the role of cultural values in defining diplomacy, and analyzes the influence of cultural values on different actors, that is, through leaders, people, organizations and other diplomatic decisions. The policy has different and multi-angle influence and function. Then this chapter discusses the decision-making mode of value diplomacy, and tries to give the decision-making behavior diagram of multi-actors and value diplomacy.
The third chapter is relatively brief, mainly reviewing the EU-China values diplomacy in recent years. Firstly, this chapter briefly reviews the major events of EU countries'values diplomacy toward China in recent years. On this basis, it points out that EU countries' attacks on China can not be simply classified as values diplomacy on many occasions, but should recognize the EU countries. The value diplomacy and the economic oppression are often intertwined and interacted. To a great extent, this kind of value diplomacy is only a diplomatic tool to exert pressure on China.
Chapter Four is an in-depth discussion and analysis of the causes of values diplomacy.It is undeniable that there are differences and divergences in values between Europeans and Chinese, which are manifested in the differences in cultural values between China and Europe and the different views on universal values. Then, this chapter compares and analyzes the values of China and Europe, and reveals to some extent the spiritual causes of the conflicts between China and Europe. The last part of this chapter dialectically analyzes the "universal values" and recognizes that some of the values of the West are to the whole. Humanity is meaningful and has a certain reference significance to us, but also refutes the European and American attempts to monopolize the discourse of values of the "universal Western values".
Chapter Five discusses how China should face the value-based diplomatic offensive launched by European countries, which belongs to policy analysis and policy suggestions. This chapter points out that China urgently needs a core value recognized by the people and accepted by the world to rebuild the soul of China's diplomacy in response to the ethical attack of the West. In addition, China's diplomacy should make good use of the Internet. Strength and social forces, actively carry out China's network diplomacy, so that the international community in the social network to recognize China, in the social network to shape China's national image.
In the concluding remarks, this paper expresses its concern about the development of China's diplomacy, and further points out that we should closely study the new developments and new situations of international politics, and attach importance to the normative factors and human values in international exchanges such as cultural values.
【学位授予单位】：南京大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D80

【相似文献】