当前国际反恐情报合作模式比较研究
[Abstract]:Since the end of the Cold War, terrorism has gradually developed into a global focus and a huge hidden danger to the security and stability of the international community. The global joint prevention and combat against terrorism is a problem that must be faced and solved by the current international security and the security of each country. As a result, international counter-terrorism cooperation has been widely valued by all countries and actively explored multi-directional and multi-level modes of cooperation. In anti-terrorism activities, the acquisition and exchange of information is undoubtedly an extremely important but extremely difficult task. Under the influence of the current network environment and big data, terrorism is characterized by networking, internationalization and instability. Therefore, countries will certainly counter-terrorism intelligence cooperation on the agenda and attach great importance to it. Through the elaboration of the concept and characteristics of anti-terrorism intelligence, this paper analyzes the current situation of international anti-terrorism intelligence cooperation, and systematically discusses the organization mode of regional anti-terrorism intelligence cooperation, including the CIS anti-terrorism intelligence cooperation. The European Union's anti-terrorism intelligence cooperation, the ASEAN anti-terrorism intelligence cooperation, the Arab League's anti-terrorism intelligence cooperation and the cooperation model of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization on counter-terrorism intelligence, and explored the cooperation of other counter-terrorism organizations, such as the United Nations Counter-Terrorism Committee, The World Criminal Police Organization and the World Bank member countries of the Financial Intelligence Cooperation Centre. According to the characteristics, commonality and difference of these existing information cooperation modes, the author points out that there are three common points in the current international anti-terrorism intelligence cooperation mode: first, the institutionalization of cooperation laws and regulations; The second is the mechanism of anti-terrorism warning, and the third is the sharing of anti-terrorism information. The paper also discusses its differences: first, the difference of the target of anti-terrorism intelligence cooperation; second, the difference of intelligence handling command system; third, the cognitive difference of intelligence cooperation among countries. In particular, it points out that there are some differences in the current mode of international anti-terrorism intelligence cooperation in the sources of terrorism, the intelligence command and handling system, the cognition of cooperation and the mode of cooperation, etc. It is pointed out that the cooperation of regional anti-terrorism intelligence is based on a stronger common interest and a wider scope of cooperation. In the last chapter, through the analysis of the situation faced by the international anti-terrorism intelligence cooperation, aiming at the actual situation of our country, we find out the problems and shortcomings in our country's anti-terrorism intelligence cooperation mode, and according to our own national conditions and the actual situation, Draw lessons from foreign anti-terrorist intelligence mechanism and model to make up for the lack of anti-terrorism intelligence work in China. In this paper, two charts are drawn to show the design of anti-terrorist intelligence early warning system and intelligence sharing process in China, and try to build a three-dimensional, omnidirectional anti-terrorism intelligence early warning and sharing system to ensure the timely and accurate information. Enhancing the utilization of anti-terrorism intelligence, promoting anti-terrorism cooperation with other countries, and making efforts to crack down on terrorists are conducive to maintaining world peace and stability.
【学位授予单位】:中国人民公安大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D815.5
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈明;凌云翔;;反恐情报中心主导下的情报共享机制研究[J];江南社会学院学报;2016年03期
2 李春;;恐怖融资犯罪防控路径研究(上)——以刑法120条和191条为视角[J];犯罪研究;2015年05期
3 尹建强;;论古代军事著作《孙子兵法》中的思想主题[J];出版广角;2015年09期
4 卢文刚;蔡裕岚;;新加坡的全民反恐及其启示[J];中国应急管理;2015年05期
5 刘瑞红;;中美反恐情报工作比较研究[J];科技情报开发与经济;2015年06期
6 李杰楠;;我国反恐情报体系的不足与完善[J];法制与社会;2015年06期
7 赵云鹏;;东南亚地区反恐问题研究[J];辽宁警专学报;2014年06期
8 王英良;;普京新政与俄罗斯东正教会公共外交[J];西伯利亚研究;2014年05期
9 罗刚;;反恐对策:美国经验与中国选择[J];政法论丛;2014年05期
10 高荣伟;;令人胆寒的摩萨德[J];侨园;2013年09期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 王利文;东南亚反恐合作的国际制度研究[D];山东大学;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 李楠;中国—东盟地区反恐合作体系研究[D];湘潭大学;2014年
2 顾炜;反恐预警中的情报管理研究[D];上海交通大学;2009年
3 王振东;东盟反恐合作及制度化建设[D];山东大学;2009年
4 庄晓英;论当代恐怖主义的演变和发展[D];上海交通大学;2008年
5 肖新;新制度主义视野下的国际反恐合作研究[D];苏州大学;2007年
6 石玉英;经济全球化下恐怖主义犯罪研究[D];湖南大学;2004年
,本文编号:2265952
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/2265952.html