欧盟的非正式治理模式刍议——以欧盟难民政策的发展为例
发布时间：2018-11-10 08:19
【摘要】：不同于对欧盟的主流认识。欧盟各个政策领域中背离正式规则的政治实践无处不在。就欧盟非正式治理的发生机制而言。特定政治风险与正式规则的组合会形成非正式治理的变革窗口,而特定的认知框架则会促进或限制非正式治理的发生。本文主要提出中心化和去中心化两种类别的非正式治理,然后将现有文献中众多的非正式治理模式按照不同的非正式治理类别和政策阶段做出完整的类型划分。最后。本文认为在欧盟难民政策实现共同体化以后,只有部分国家面临难民风险,加上难民问题的安全化认知导致难民政策一直由去中心化的非正式治理主导;但是近期由于难民问题发展成为席卷整个欧洲的危机以及欧洲民众对难民问题认知框架的改变,难民政策的非正式治理受到了限制。因此,对难民政策的考量还将放到非正式治理和正式规则之间的互动中以及一体化发展程度等宏观背景下进行深入研究。
[Abstract]:Different from the mainstream view of the EU. Political practice that deviates from formal rules in all areas of EU policy is ubiquitous. As far as the mechanism of informal governance in the EU is concerned. The combination of specific political risks and formal rules will form a window of change in informal governance, while a specific cognitive framework will promote or limit the occurrence of informal governance. This paper mainly proposes two types of informal governance: centralization and decentralization, and then classifies the various informal governance models according to different informal governance categories and policy stages. Last This paper argues that only some countries face the risk of refugees after the EU refugee policy realizes communization, and the cognition of refugee problem security results in that the refugee policy has been dominated by the decentralization of informal governance. But the informal governance of refugee policy has been constrained by the recent crisis that has engulfed Europe as a whole and the change in the framework of European people's perception of refugee issues. Therefore, the consideration of refugee policy will be further studied in the context of the interaction between informal governance and formal rules and the degree of integration.
【作者单位】： 复旦大学;巴黎政治学院;
【分类号】：D814.1;D815.6
[Abstract]:Different from the mainstream view of the EU. Political practice that deviates from formal rules in all areas of EU policy is ubiquitous. As far as the mechanism of informal governance in the EU is concerned. The combination of specific political risks and formal rules will form a window of change in informal governance, while a specific cognitive framework will promote or limit the occurrence of informal governance. This paper mainly proposes two types of informal governance: centralization and decentralization, and then classifies the various informal governance models according to different informal governance categories and policy stages. Last This paper argues that only some countries face the risk of refugees after the EU refugee policy realizes communization, and the cognition of refugee problem security results in that the refugee policy has been dominated by the decentralization of informal governance. But the informal governance of refugee policy has been constrained by the recent crisis that has engulfed Europe as a whole and the change in the framework of European people's perception of refugee issues. Therefore, the consideration of refugee policy will be further studied in the context of the interaction between informal governance and formal rules and the degree of integration.
【作者单位】： 复旦大学;巴黎政治学院;
【分类号】：D814.1;D815.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 朱贵昌;;试析欧盟多层次的政策执行机制[J];国际论坛;2009年02期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 朱贵昌;;开放协调机制——欧盟应对成员国多样性的新治理模式[J];国际论坛;2010年03期
2 袁仁辉;;多维视角下的欧盟法律输出[J];北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版);2015年04期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 王苹;欧洲一体化进程中的区域治理研究[D];吉林大学;2011年
【二级参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 曲U，
本文编号：2321911
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/2321911.html
