中日钓鱼岛争端国际法解决途径探索
发布时间：2018-12-21 08:47
【摘要】：中日两国关于钓鱼岛的争端由来已久,近年来,日本频频在钓鱼岛问题上向中国挑衅,钓鱼岛问题更是成为影响中日关系的棘手问题之一,2012年9月日本更是闹出了买岛的闹剧,日本千方百计争夺钓鱼岛,与钓鱼岛重要的战略地位,丰富的资源等因素是离不丌的。 关于钓鱼岛的归属问题,中日两国各自提出了自己的证据,包括地理、历史、国际关系、国际法等各个方面,一般来说和平解决领土争端,往往采用政治或外交途径,但是当政治和外交途径都无法解决时,比较有效的方式就是提交国际法庭。如果提交国际法庭,探索钓鱼岛属于中国的法律证据和法理依据无疑是非常必要的,尤其是利用国际法原则和规则,从中找出有利于中国的证据。要真正利用国际法来解决,必须搞清楚日方所依据的内容,从中找出其破绽,或找出史加有力的证据,趋利避害。 中日两国关于钓鱼岛问题,进行过多回合的政治、经济和军事交涉,但仍没有得到解决。目前,国内关于解决钓鱼岛问题的论文和专著很多,但大都重复地论述原有的证据,从困际司法方面,尤其是从国际法院曾经解决过的领土争端案例来分析钓鱼岛问题的很少。因此,本文归纳整理国内外中日双方关于钓鱼岛问题的证据,通过国际法院判例中的领土解决模式分析中日双方关于钓鱼岛问题证据的可取性,找出解决钓鱼岛问题的关键点,以期为以后付诸国际法院解决钓鱼岛问题提供良好借鉴。
[Abstract]:The dispute between China and Japan over the Diaoyu Islands has a long history. In recent years, Japan has frequently challenged China on the Diaoyu Islands issue, and the Diaoyu Islands issue has become one of the thorny problems affecting Sino-Japanese relations. In September 2012, Japan even made a farce about buying the islands. Japan tried every possible means to compete for the Diaoyu Islands, with the important strategic position of the Diaoyu Islands, rich resources and other factors are inseparable. On the issue of the ownership of the Diaoyu Islands, China and Japan have each presented their own evidence, including geography, history, international relations, international law, and other aspects. Generally speaking, the peaceful settlement of territorial disputes often adopts political or diplomatic channels. But when both political and diplomatic avenues cannot be resolved, the more effective way is to refer them to the International Tribunal. If submitted to the International Court of Justice, it is undoubtedly necessary to explore the legal evidence and legal basis of the Diaoyu Islands belonging to China, especially to use the principles and rules of international law to find evidence in favour of China. In order to use international law to solve the problem, it is necessary to find out the contents on which Japan is based, to find out its flaws, or to find out the strong evidence of Shiga, so as to seek advantages and avoid disadvantages. China and Japan have engaged in a number of rounds of political, economic and military negotiations on the Diaoyu Islands, but have not yet been resolved. At present, there are a lot of papers and monographs on solving the Diaoyu Island problem in China, but most of them have repeatedly discussed the original evidence, and few of them have analyzed the Diaoyu Islands problem from the aspects of the judicature, especially from the case of the territorial dispute settled by the International Court of Justice. Therefore, this paper summarizes and collates the evidence on Diaoyu Islands between China and Japan at home and abroad, analyzes the desirability of the evidence on Diaoyu Islands between China and Japan through the territorial settlement model in the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice, and finds out the key points to solve the Diaoyu Islands problem. With a view to the future implementation of the International Court of Justice to solve the Diaoyu Islands to provide a good reference.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D815.3
本文编号：2388682
[Abstract]:The dispute between China and Japan over the Diaoyu Islands has a long history. In recent years, Japan has frequently challenged China on the Diaoyu Islands issue, and the Diaoyu Islands issue has become one of the thorny problems affecting Sino-Japanese relations. In September 2012, Japan even made a farce about buying the islands. Japan tried every possible means to compete for the Diaoyu Islands, with the important strategic position of the Diaoyu Islands, rich resources and other factors are inseparable. On the issue of the ownership of the Diaoyu Islands, China and Japan have each presented their own evidence, including geography, history, international relations, international law, and other aspects. Generally speaking, the peaceful settlement of territorial disputes often adopts political or diplomatic channels. But when both political and diplomatic avenues cannot be resolved, the more effective way is to refer them to the International Tribunal. If submitted to the International Court of Justice, it is undoubtedly necessary to explore the legal evidence and legal basis of the Diaoyu Islands belonging to China, especially to use the principles and rules of international law to find evidence in favour of China. In order to use international law to solve the problem, it is necessary to find out the contents on which Japan is based, to find out its flaws, or to find out the strong evidence of Shiga, so as to seek advantages and avoid disadvantages. China and Japan have engaged in a number of rounds of political, economic and military negotiations on the Diaoyu Islands, but have not yet been resolved. At present, there are a lot of papers and monographs on solving the Diaoyu Island problem in China, but most of them have repeatedly discussed the original evidence, and few of them have analyzed the Diaoyu Islands problem from the aspects of the judicature, especially from the case of the territorial dispute settled by the International Court of Justice. Therefore, this paper summarizes and collates the evidence on Diaoyu Islands between China and Japan at home and abroad, analyzes the desirability of the evidence on Diaoyu Islands between China and Japan through the territorial settlement model in the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice, and finds out the key points to solve the Diaoyu Islands problem. With a view to the future implementation of the International Court of Justice to solve the Diaoyu Islands to provide a good reference.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D815.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 游博;;透析中日油气资源及东海大陆架划分之争问题[J];长白学刊;2006年01期
2 曲波;;有效控制原则在解决岛屿争端中的适用[J];当代法学;2010年01期
3 杨扬;;日美同盟的调整与中国外交的战略选择[J];国际关系学院学报;2008年03期
4 张峧;;国际法视角下的钓鱼岛问题研究[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2013年02期
5 韩昭庆;;从甲午战争前欧洲人所绘中国地图看钓鱼岛列岛的历史[J];复旦学报(社会科学版);2013年01期
6 刘江永;;安倍再度执政后的中日关系展望[J];东北亚论坛;2013年02期
7 司徒尚纪;关于钓鱼岛群岛历史地理的若干问题[J];岭南文史;1997年01期
8 武圣涛;;中国对钓鱼岛享有主权之历史依据[J];内蒙古电大学刊;2008年10期
9 丁志强;;新现实主义视角下日本对华政策的演变[J];吉林省教育学院学报(下旬);2013年03期
10 余建斌;;解密中国海监巡航执法——记者随海监船巡航钓鱼岛海域[J];中国经济周刊;2013年09期
，本文编号：2388682
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/2388682.html
