历史怨恨情感和规范认同：非盟与东盟人权规范的比较研究
发布时间：2018-12-27 09:50
【摘要】：本文旨在于对历史怨恨情感和规范认同之间的因果关系进行论证。主要包括理论的逻辑演绎和经验的事实验证。在理论演绎环节,本文将沿着两条论证路径而展开:第一,历史怨恨情感影响了行为体的规范认知进程,从而影响了行为体的规范认同;第二,历史怨恨情感影响了行为体的集体身份建构进程,从而影响了行为体的规范认同。在经验验证环节,本文集中于非盟和东盟的案例比较研究。非洲联盟和东南亚国家联盟同为发展中国家联盟,但二者在人权规范的认同上却呈现出重大的差异:非盟奉行“非漠视”原则,东盟奉行“不干涉”原则,这种认同差异与二者在历史的进程中形成的怨恨情感具有密切的相关性。对非盟而言,几百年的奴隶贸易和殖民主义活动使非洲对人权侵害事项(种族主义和种族歧视)持有历史怨恨情感,而对东南亚国家而言,将近两千年的华夷秩序和几百年的殖民主义使得东南亚国家对主权侵害事项持有历史怨恨情感。非盟和东盟不同的怨恨情感影响了二者各自的人权规范认知进程和集体身份建构进程,最终二者形成了不同的人权规范认同。因此,本文的研究证实了历史怨恨情感和规范认同之间具有因果相关性。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the causal relationship between historical resentment and normative identity. It mainly includes the logical deduction of theory and the fact verification of experience. In the link of theoretical deduction, this paper will develop along two paths of argumentation: first, historical resentment affects the normative cognitive process of the actor and thus affects the normative identity of the actor; Secondly, historical resentment affects the process of collective identity construction of actors, thus affecting the normative identity of actors. In empirical verification, this paper focuses on the case study of AU and ASEAN. The African Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations are both developing countries, but there are significant differences between them in the recognition of human rights norms: the African Union pursues the principle of "non-indifference" and ASEAN pursues the principle of "non-intervention". This identity difference is closely related to the resentment between the two in the course of history. For the AU, centuries of slave trade and colonialism have led to historical resentment in Africa over human rights violations (racism and racial discrimination), while for the countries of South-East Asia, The nearly 2000-year order and centuries of colonialism have made Southeast Asian nations historically resentful of sovereignty violations. The different resentment feelings of AU and ASEAN affect the cognitive process of human rights norms and the process of collective identity construction, and finally form different human rights norms identity. Therefore, this study confirms the causal relationship between historical resentment and normative identity.
【学位授予单位】：外交学院
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D814.1;D815.7
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the causal relationship between historical resentment and normative identity. It mainly includes the logical deduction of theory and the fact verification of experience. In the link of theoretical deduction, this paper will develop along two paths of argumentation: first, historical resentment affects the normative cognitive process of the actor and thus affects the normative identity of the actor; Secondly, historical resentment affects the process of collective identity construction of actors, thus affecting the normative identity of actors. In empirical verification, this paper focuses on the case study of AU and ASEAN. The African Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations are both developing countries, but there are significant differences between them in the recognition of human rights norms: the African Union pursues the principle of "non-indifference" and ASEAN pursues the principle of "non-intervention". This identity difference is closely related to the resentment between the two in the course of history. For the AU, centuries of slave trade and colonialism have led to historical resentment in Africa over human rights violations (racism and racial discrimination), while for the countries of South-East Asia, The nearly 2000-year order and centuries of colonialism have made Southeast Asian nations historically resentful of sovereignty violations. The different resentment feelings of AU and ASEAN affect the cognitive process of human rights norms and the process of collective identity construction, and finally form different human rights norms identity. Therefore, this study confirms the causal relationship between historical resentment and normative identity.
【学位授予单位】：外交学院
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D814.1;D815.7
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 方慧玲;;佟晓玲谈20年来中国与东盟关系发展及未来走向[J];法制与经济(上旬刊);2011年06期
2 王勉;王军伟;王秋凤;;中国—东盟自贸区“周年”兴旺[J];w，
本文编号：2392882
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/2392882.html
