中美结构性矛盾辨析
发布时间:2019-03-01 08:08
【摘要】: 在新世纪的中美关系中,中美结构性矛盾成为双方冲突的核心。研究结构性矛盾首先需要确定结构的含义。西方学者理解的中美结构性矛盾就是中美在国际体系中的矛盾;而中国学者对中美结构性矛盾的理解更偏重于中美关系本身结构中的矛盾。 本文首先应用结构主义理论提炼出中美关系“自行车”式的基本结构,中美之间的复杂联系构成了自行车的基本框架,结构性合作与结构性矛盾组成自行车的两个车轮。主动轮提供动力,代表的是能够推进中美关系发展的结构性合作因素,包括复合型相互依赖、文明的交流、复合型机制、维护世界和平与稳定和反恐因素。从动轮代表的是能够阻碍中美关系发展的结构性矛盾因素,包括意识形态分歧、文明的差异、地缘政治竞争、“崛起”与“守成”大国的冲突和台湾问题。然后,根据解构主义的理论分析中美关系结构的发展及其规律。最后根据建构主义的理论探讨了解决中美结构性矛盾的消解路径。中美结构性矛盾既包含结构性因素,又包含非结构性因素。在新的历史时期,中美关系必须直面根本性的分歧,而无法继续搁置争议。中美结构性矛盾中的非结构性因素成为新时期中美关系发展的新空间。 “崛起国”与“霸权国”的冲突中包括中国和平发展的和平本质、全球化的发展环境、大国和平和合作的时代与和平崛起的先例等非结构性因素。地缘政治竞争包括美国的地区实力平衡战略、东亚各国寻求地区稳定、中国威胁的非现实性与美国稳定东亚局势的意愿等非结构性因素。意识形态分歧与文明的差异包括冷战后意识形态的斗争逐渐淡化、文明的交流与融合和错误知觉等非结构性因素。台湾问题包括中美希望避免冲突、两岸交往日益密切、美国对台军售受到很大制约等非结构性矛盾。 根据影响中美关系发展的因素,本文描述了未来中美关系可能出现的三种情景:全面冲突、混沌状态和战略互信。在处理中美关系的过程中应该预防全面冲突,促进合作关系,巩固机制成果。
[Abstract]:In the new century, the structural contradiction between China and the United States has become the core of the conflict between China and the United States. The study of structural contradictions first needs to determine the meaning of the structure. The structural contradiction between China and the United States is the contradiction between China and the United States in the international system, and the understanding of the structural contradiction between China and the United States by Chinese scholars is more focused on the contradictions in the structure of Sino-US relations. In this paper, the basic structure of bicycles in Sino-US relations is extracted from the theory of structuralism. The complex relations between China and the United States constitute the basic framework of bicycles, and the structural cooperation and structural contradictions constitute the two wheels of bicycles. The initiative wheel provides impetus for structural cooperation factors that can promote the development of Sino-US relations, including complex interdependence, civilized exchanges, complex mechanisms, safeguarding world peace and stability, and counter-terrorism factors. The driven wheel represents the structural contradictions that can hinder the development of Sino-US relations, including ideological differences, differences in civilization, geopolitical competition, the conflict between "rising" and "defending" powers, and the Taiwan issue. Then, according to the theory of deconstructionism, the development and law of Sino-US relationship structure are analyzed. Finally, according to the theory of constructivism, the way to resolve the structural contradiction between China and the United States is discussed. The structural contradiction between China and the United States contains both structural and non-structural factors. In a new historical period, Sino-US relations must face fundamental differences and cannot continue to shelve disputes. The non-structural factors in the structural contradiction between China and the United States have become a new space for the development of Sino-US relations in the new period. The conflicts between "rising states" and "hegemons" include the peaceful nature of China's peaceful development, the development environment of globalization, the era of peace and cooperation among great powers, and the precedent of peaceful rise. Geopolitical competition includes non-structural factors such as the regional power balance strategy of the United States, the search for regional stability by East Asian countries, the non-reality of China's threat and the willingness of the United States to stabilize the situation in East Asia. The differences between ideology and civilization include non-structural factors, such as the ideological struggle after the Cold War, the communication and fusion of civilization and false perception. The Taiwan issue includes non-structural contradictions such as Sino-US hopes to avoid conflict, closer cross-strait exchanges, and great constraints on US arms sales to Taiwan. According to the factors that influence the development of Sino-US relations, this paper describes three possible scenarios of Sino-US relations in the future: all-round conflict, chaotic state and strategic mutual trust. In the process of handling Sino-US relations, we should prevent all-round conflicts, promote cooperative relations, and consolidate the achievements of the mechanism.
【学位授予单位】:中共中央党校
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D822.371.2
本文编号:2432244
[Abstract]:In the new century, the structural contradiction between China and the United States has become the core of the conflict between China and the United States. The study of structural contradictions first needs to determine the meaning of the structure. The structural contradiction between China and the United States is the contradiction between China and the United States in the international system, and the understanding of the structural contradiction between China and the United States by Chinese scholars is more focused on the contradictions in the structure of Sino-US relations. In this paper, the basic structure of bicycles in Sino-US relations is extracted from the theory of structuralism. The complex relations between China and the United States constitute the basic framework of bicycles, and the structural cooperation and structural contradictions constitute the two wheels of bicycles. The initiative wheel provides impetus for structural cooperation factors that can promote the development of Sino-US relations, including complex interdependence, civilized exchanges, complex mechanisms, safeguarding world peace and stability, and counter-terrorism factors. The driven wheel represents the structural contradictions that can hinder the development of Sino-US relations, including ideological differences, differences in civilization, geopolitical competition, the conflict between "rising" and "defending" powers, and the Taiwan issue. Then, according to the theory of deconstructionism, the development and law of Sino-US relationship structure are analyzed. Finally, according to the theory of constructivism, the way to resolve the structural contradiction between China and the United States is discussed. The structural contradiction between China and the United States contains both structural and non-structural factors. In a new historical period, Sino-US relations must face fundamental differences and cannot continue to shelve disputes. The non-structural factors in the structural contradiction between China and the United States have become a new space for the development of Sino-US relations in the new period. The conflicts between "rising states" and "hegemons" include the peaceful nature of China's peaceful development, the development environment of globalization, the era of peace and cooperation among great powers, and the precedent of peaceful rise. Geopolitical competition includes non-structural factors such as the regional power balance strategy of the United States, the search for regional stability by East Asian countries, the non-reality of China's threat and the willingness of the United States to stabilize the situation in East Asia. The differences between ideology and civilization include non-structural factors, such as the ideological struggle after the Cold War, the communication and fusion of civilization and false perception. The Taiwan issue includes non-structural contradictions such as Sino-US hopes to avoid conflict, closer cross-strait exchanges, and great constraints on US arms sales to Taiwan. According to the factors that influence the development of Sino-US relations, this paper describes three possible scenarios of Sino-US relations in the future: all-round conflict, chaotic state and strategic mutual trust. In the process of handling Sino-US relations, we should prevent all-round conflicts, promote cooperative relations, and consolidate the achievements of the mechanism.
【学位授予单位】:中共中央党校
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D822.371.2
【引证文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 陈勇;;“巨人的碰撞”——中美关系政治隐喻解读[J];东南学术;2013年06期
2 陈奕平;宋敏锋;;美国华侨华人政治经济发展新形势及对我国政策建议[J];八桂侨刊;2014年01期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 刘惠华;世界格局及身份的定位与中美关系—一种建构主义的分析[D];北京外国语大学;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 白昱;新世纪初期中美关系中的国家利益研究[D];内蒙古大学;2011年
,本文编号:2432244
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/2432244.html