欧盟对华决策中的主体间认知差异评析
发布时间：2019-07-10 11:30
【摘要】：近年来,欧盟对华决策中的主体间认知差异间题日益突出,对中欧关系所产生的影响也越来越明显。基于此,本文以对外决策中的认知差异为理论视角,探讨欧盟对华决策中主体间认知差异对于中欧关系所产生的影响。“主体间认知差异”包含了“欧盟内部各决策主体之间的认知差异”与“欧盟与中国(政府)之间的认知差异”两个方面。本文以各领域对中欧关系所造成的负面影响的严重程度由重至轻把“认知差异”划分为政治、文化、经济以及外交与安全四个领域。本文列举了各领域中所存在的三或四个主体间认知差异问题,进而运用总结归纳法从“欧盟内部的认知差异”、“欧盟与中国之间的认知差异”、“认知差异形成的主要原因”以及“对中欧关系所形成的影响”四个角度总结出各领域的特点。并在此基础上,总结出不同类型的主体间认知差异对中欧关系起到怎样的影响。 本文首先从理论上演绎对外决策中的认知差异。阐述在对外决策中,认知主体的指示对象、认知客体所包括的范围、认知差异的表现形式、产生认知差异的原因以及认知差异在对外决策中产生的影响。接着进一步比较系统地阐述欧盟对华决策中的认知差异问题。欧盟的对华决策主体包括了官方和非官方两个层面,官方层面包括欧盟三大机构以及成员国政府,而非官方层面包括智库、媒体以及普通民众。欧盟的对华认知差异表现在两个方面,一是欧盟内部各主体间的认知差异,二是欧盟与中国之间的认知差异。欧盟的对华认知差异涉及领域政治领域、文化领域、经济领域、以及外交与安全领域。欧盟对华认知差异存在三种不同状况,且每种状况所产生的影响也有所不同。欧盟对华认知差异的形成因素包括认知主体、认知客体、认知情景和信息传递四个方面。 在政治领域,欧盟内部的认知较一致,中欧之间的认知差异尖锐对立甚至截然相反,核心价值观的冲突和对核心国家利益的挑战成为该领域差异形成的主要原因,该领域的主体间认知差异对中欧关系产生了严重性、长期性和难以调和的负面影响。在文化领域,欧盟内部的认知较一致,中欧之间的认知差异明显,文化背景和历史发展进程的差异成为该领域差异形成的主要原因,该领域的主体间认知差异对中欧关系产生了长期、间接性和难以调和的负面影响。在经贸领域,欧盟内部各决策主体之间存在一定的认知差异,中欧之间也存在一定差异但通过对话与协商可以弥合,经济利益的博弈和衡量标准的差异成为该领域差异形成的主要原因,该领域的认知差异对中欧关系产生的负面影响短期、非严重和可调和性的。在外交与安全领域,欧盟内部各决策主体之间存在一定的认知差异,中欧之间也存在一定差异但通过对话与协商可以弥合,利益的博弈和价值观的冲突成为该领域差异形成的主要原因,该领域的认知差异对中欧关系产生的负面影响短期、可控和可调和性的。 在未来一段时期里,产生主体间认知差异的四个因素都会发生一些变化。对于中国而言,应对欧盟对华决策中的主体间认知差异问题,中国在心理上应该以理性而冷静的眼光看待这一问题,认识到该问题的广泛性、长期性和复杂性,并制订具体的对策以应对之。 在进行经过详细的分析后,最后总结出本文的结论：欧盟对华决策中的主体间认知差异对中欧关系的影响具有多重性。中欧关系不仅受到中欧之间的认知差异的影响,也受到欧盟内部决策主体之间的认知差异的影响。总体上看,受欧盟决策机制的影响,欧盟内部决策主体之间的认知差异对中欧关系的影响具有两面性：一方面当中欧在此类问题上发生摩擦时,欧盟内部的认知差异会防止中欧在此问题上进一步恶化；另一方面当中欧在此类问题上需要再向前发展时,欧盟内部的认知差异会防碍中欧在此类问题上合作的深化。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the inter-subjectivity in the EU's decision-making in China has become more and more prominent, and the impact on China-EU relations has become more and more obvious. Based on this, this paper, based on the cognitive differences in foreign policy-making, discusses the impact of the EU-China's cognitive differences on China-EU relations in the decision-making of China. The "inter-body cognitive difference" contains both "The cognitive difference between the decision-making bodies within the EU" and "Cognitive Differences between the EU and China (Government)". This paper divides the "cognitive difference" into four areas: politics, culture, economy and diplomacy and security. In this paper, the problems of the three or four main subjects in various fields are listed, and the characteristics of each field are summarized from the "Cognitive Differences in the EU", the "The Cognitive Differences between the EU and China", the "The main causes of the formation of cognitive difference" and the "The impact on the relations between China and Europe" by using the summary induction method. On this basis, the effect of different types of inter-body cognitive differences on China-EU relations is summarized. In this paper, the cognitive difference in foreign decision-making is deduced from the theory In the foreign policy-making, the target of the cognitive subject, the range of the cognitive object, the expression of the cognitive difference, the cause of the cognitive difference and the shadow of the cognitive difference in the foreign policy-making In this paper, the cognitive differences in the EU's decision-making in China are further discussed in a more systematic way. The EU's decision-making body to China includes both the official and non-official levels, the official level of which includes the three EU institutions and the government of the member States, while the unofficial level includes think tanks, the media and the ordinary people The differences between the EU and China show that the differences between the EU and China are different, and the other is the difference between the EU and China. The EU's cognitive differences with China are related to areas of political, cultural, economic and diplomatic and security. There are three different conditions in the EU's cognitive differences with China, and the impact of each situation is different In the same way, the factors of the EU's cognitive difference to China include the cognitive subject, the cognitive object, the cognitive context and the information transfer. On the other hand, in the political field, the internal cognition of the EU is more consistent, the cognitive difference between Central and Central Europe is sharp and even the opposite, the conflict of the core values and the challenge to the interests of the core countries have become the main differences in this field For the reason, the inter-body cognitive difference in this field has a negative, long-term and difficult to reconcile with China-EU relations In the field of culture, the cognition of the EU is more consistent, the cognitive difference between China and the EU is clear, the difference between the cultural background and the historical development process is the main reason for the difference in this field, and the inter-body cognitive difference in this field is the result of the relationship between the two countries A negative, indirectness, and incongruity. In the economic and trade field, there are some cognitive differences among the decision-making bodies within the EU. There is a certain difference between the central and the EU, but through dialogue and consultation, the difference of the game and the measure of the economic interests is the main difference in this field. For reasons, the cognitive differences in this area have a short, non-serious, and adjustable negative impact on the relationship between China and China In the field of diplomacy and security, there is a certain cognitive difference between the various decision-making bodies in the EU, and there is a certain difference between the central and the EU, but the conflict between the game and the value of interests can be closed through dialogue and consultation, and the conflict between the interests is the main form of the difference in this field. For the reason, the cognitive differences in this field have a short, controllable and adjustable negative impact on the relationship between China and China and sex. In the coming period, the four factors that produce the main body-to-body cognitive difference will be sent There are some changes. In the case of China, China should look at this issue in a rational and dispassionate manner in response to the differences between the main subjects in the EU's decision-making in China, and recognize the wide, long-term and complex nature of the problem, and formulate specific countermeasures In order to deal with it, the conclusion of this paper is concluded after the detailed analysis is carried out: the main body-to-body cognitive difference in the EU's decision-making in China is the relation between China and China The effect of China-EU relations is not only influenced by the cognitive differences between Central and Central Europe, but also between the internal decision-making bodies of the European Union. The effect of the cognitive difference is that the influence of the EU's decision-making mechanism, the influence of the EU's internal decision-making body on the relationship between the EU and the EU has two sides: on the one hand, when the Central and Central Europe is in friction with such problems, the differences in the EU's cognition can prevent Central Europe from asking this question. On the other hand, when Central Europe needs to develop further on such issues, the differences in the European Union's cognitive differences will prevent Central Europe from this type of question
【学位授予单位】：华东师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D85;D822.35
[Abstract]:In recent years, the inter-subjectivity in the EU's decision-making in China has become more and more prominent, and the impact on China-EU relations has become more and more obvious. Based on this, this paper, based on the cognitive differences in foreign policy-making, discusses the impact of the EU-China's cognitive differences on China-EU relations in the decision-making of China. The "inter-body cognitive difference" contains both "The cognitive difference between the decision-making bodies within the EU" and "Cognitive Differences between the EU and China (Government)". This paper divides the "cognitive difference" into four areas: politics, culture, economy and diplomacy and security. In this paper, the problems of the three or four main subjects in various fields are listed, and the characteristics of each field are summarized from the "Cognitive Differences in the EU", the "The Cognitive Differences between the EU and China", the "The main causes of the formation of cognitive difference" and the "The impact on the relations between China and Europe" by using the summary induction method. On this basis, the effect of different types of inter-body cognitive differences on China-EU relations is summarized. In this paper, the cognitive difference in foreign decision-making is deduced from the theory In the foreign policy-making, the target of the cognitive subject, the range of the cognitive object, the expression of the cognitive difference, the cause of the cognitive difference and the shadow of the cognitive difference in the foreign policy-making In this paper, the cognitive differences in the EU's decision-making in China are further discussed in a more systematic way. The EU's decision-making body to China includes both the official and non-official levels, the official level of which includes the three EU institutions and the government of the member States, while the unofficial level includes think tanks, the media and the ordinary people The differences between the EU and China show that the differences between the EU and China are different, and the other is the difference between the EU and China. The EU's cognitive differences with China are related to areas of political, cultural, economic and diplomatic and security. There are three different conditions in the EU's cognitive differences with China, and the impact of each situation is different In the same way, the factors of the EU's cognitive difference to China include the cognitive subject, the cognitive object, the cognitive context and the information transfer. On the other hand, in the political field, the internal cognition of the EU is more consistent, the cognitive difference between Central and Central Europe is sharp and even the opposite, the conflict of the core values and the challenge to the interests of the core countries have become the main differences in this field For the reason, the inter-body cognitive difference in this field has a negative, long-term and difficult to reconcile with China-EU relations In the field of culture, the cognition of the EU is more consistent, the cognitive difference between China and the EU is clear, the difference between the cultural background and the historical development process is the main reason for the difference in this field, and the inter-body cognitive difference in this field is the result of the relationship between the two countries A negative, indirectness, and incongruity. In the economic and trade field, there are some cognitive differences among the decision-making bodies within the EU. There is a certain difference between the central and the EU, but through dialogue and consultation, the difference of the game and the measure of the economic interests is the main difference in this field. For reasons, the cognitive differences in this area have a short, non-serious, and adjustable negative impact on the relationship between China and China In the field of diplomacy and security, there is a certain cognitive difference between the various decision-making bodies in the EU, and there is a certain difference between the central and the EU, but the conflict between the game and the value of interests can be closed through dialogue and consultation, and the conflict between the interests is the main form of the difference in this field. For the reason, the cognitive differences in this field have a short, controllable and adjustable negative impact on the relationship between China and China and sex. In the coming period, the four factors that produce the main body-to-body cognitive difference will be sent There are some changes. In the case of China, China should look at this issue in a rational and dispassionate manner in response to the differences between the main subjects in the EU's decision-making in China, and recognize the wide, long-term and complex nature of the problem, and formulate specific countermeasures In order to deal with it, the conclusion of this paper is concluded after the detailed analysis is carried out: the main body-to-body cognitive difference in the EU's decision-making in China is the relation between China and China The effect of China-EU relations is not only influenced by the cognitive differences between Central and Central Europe, but also between the internal decision-making bodies of the European Union. The effect of the cognitive difference is that the influence of the EU's decision-making mechanism, the influence of the EU's internal decision-making body on the relationship between the EU and the EU has two sides: on the one hand, when the Central and Central Europe is in friction with such problems, the differences in the EU's cognition can prevent Central Europe from asking this question. On the other hand, when Central Europe needs to develop further on such issues, the differences in the European Union's cognitive differences will prevent Central Europe from this type of question
【学位授予单位】：华东师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D85;D822.35
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈建荣;结构与单元——美国对华决策的系统分析[J];东南亚研究;2004年06期
2 柯布尔;;美对华决策的矛盾历史[J];环球人物;2006年19期
3 熊婕;;性别鉴定与选择性引流产的两性认知差异[J];法制与社会;2006年23期
4 王燕;;欧洲思想库在欧盟对华决策中的地位和作用[J];欧洲研究;2009年02期
5 邱伟;美国思想库在对华决策中的角色透视[J];学习月刊;2003年12期
6 何德功;影响日本对华决策的四大因素[J];w，
本文编号：2512573
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/2512573.html
