利哈乔夫与古米廖夫的思想分歧

发布时间：2018-03-08 02:31

  本文选题：古米廖夫　切入点：利哈乔夫　出处：《学术交流》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：正杨明明在《俄罗斯文艺》2016年第3期撰文指出,纵观利哈乔夫与古米廖夫的思想体系,两位学者最大的分歧就体现在他们对俄罗斯历史演变进程的认识与文化类型的界定上,但是,这种分歧却不能简单地归结为斯拉夫派与西方派对立的延续。首先,利哈乔夫与古米廖夫都反对彼得大帝改革是俄罗斯历史转折点的观点,所不同的是利哈乔夫认为俄国的转型是14世纪以来历史发展
[Abstract]:In the third issue of "Russian Literature and Art" on 2016, Zheng Yang Mingming pointed out that throughout the ideological system of Likhachev and Gumiliov, the greatest difference between the two scholars lies in their understanding of the historical evolution of Russia and the definition of cultural types. But this disagreement cannot simply be summed up as a continuation of the opposition between the Slavs and the West. First, Likhachev and Gumiliov both opposed the idea that Peter the Great's reform was a turning point in Russia's history. What is different is that Likhachev believes that Russia's transformation is a historical development since 14th century.
【分类号】：G151.2
，

本文编号：1582046