英国和朝鲜战争

发布时间：2018-02-21 09:18

本文关键词： 英国朝鲜战争联合国　出处：《山西大学》2008年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 二战后,世界大国由合作走向对抗,国际冷战的气氛也漫延到东亚。英国虽属西方阵营,但在缓和国际冷战氛围,避免双方发生直接对峙方面不遗余力。可以说,英国是遏制世界大战的一大主力,在战后国际关系中发挥了重要的作用。本文以英国本身为出发点,考察英国在此时期中与朝鲜战争有着密切联系的中、美、苏各大国之间的互动,全面地分析整个朝鲜战争过程中的国家因素,以期形成对英国在朝鲜战争过程中所发挥作用的清晰认识。同时将本着历史唯物主义和辩证唯物主义的基本原则,遵从历史发展趋势,通过对具体史料的掌握来综合分析影响英国在朝鲜战争中行为的多种因素,运用国际关系相关理论进一步加深理解。 1950年6月朝鲜战争的爆发使两大阵营在东亚的对峙公开化,英国虽然在朝鲜没有任何经济利益和战略利益,但仍被迫卷入这场纷争。对于英国来说,朝鲜战争是一场具有双重意义的政治战,它不仅要关心敌对方的行动,而且更重要的是要建立一个有益于英国利益的世界秩序。本文共分六部分,包括引言,正文四个章节以及结语,主要内容如下: 引言部分评述了该选题的研究现状,指出了进行该选题研究的目的和意义。第一章,主要介绍朝鲜战争爆发初期英国的反应。英国支持联合国关于朝鲜问题的决议,但却反对美国武装干涉台湾,不愿向朝鲜战场派遣陆军部队,并且积极探求和平解决问题的途径。第二章,以“联合国军”是否越过三八线为引,探讨英国为防止战争规模扩大所作的努力,包括积极酝酿非军事缓冲区计划以及努力抑制中美冲突。第三章,围绕美国威胁使用原子武器事件阐明英国为此付出的努力,以及英国对英美两国分歧的协调。第四章,主要探讨从1951年6月停战谈判达成至1953年7月朝鲜停战协定签订的整个过程中英国的作为。从开启停战谈判大门到推进和谈过程直至战俘问题的解决,英国为此孜孜不倦。结语,得出英国在朝鲜战争中的基本政策以及决定这一政策的根源。虽然英国在朝鲜战争中发挥了一定的积极作用,但实力的下降使得英国在外交上只能奉行温和的约束性政策。
[Abstract]:After World War II, the world powers changed from cooperation to confrontation, and the atmosphere of the international cold war spread to East Asia. Although Britain belongs to the Western camp, it has spared no effort in easing the atmosphere of the international cold war and avoiding direct confrontation between the two sides. Britain was the main force to contain the World War and played an important role in postwar international relations. Taking Britain itself as the starting point, this paper examines the interaction between China, the United States and the Soviet Union, which is closely related to the Korean War at this time, and comprehensively analyzes the national factors in the whole Korean War process. In order to form a clear understanding of the role played by Britain in the Korean War. At the same time, it will follow the basic principles of historical materialism and dialectical materialism and follow the trend of historical development. By mastering the specific historical data, this paper comprehensively analyzes the various factors that influence Britain's conduct in the Korean War, and makes use of the relevant theories of international relations to further deepen the understanding. In June 1950, the outbreak of the Korean War made the confrontation between the two camps public in East Asia. Britain, although it had no economic or strategic interests in North Korea, was still forced to get involved in the dispute. The Korean War is a political war of dual significance. It is not only concerned about the actions of the adversaries, but more importantly, it is necessary to establish a world order that is beneficial to the interests of Britain. This paper is divided into six parts, including the introduction, four chapters of the body and the conclusion, the main content is as follows:. The introduction reviews the research status of this topic, and points out the purpose and significance of the research. The first chapter mainly introduces the British reaction at the beginning of the Korean War. Britain supports the United Nations resolution on the Korean issue, but it opposes US armed intervention in Taiwan and does not want to send army troops to the Korean battlefield. And actively explore a peaceful solution to the problem. In the second chapter, taking whether the United Nations Army crossed the 38th line, the paper discusses the British efforts to prevent the expansion of the war, including the active preparation of the non-military buffer zone plan and the efforts to curb the conflict between China and the United States. Chapter three illustrates Britain's efforts in this regard over the threat of the use of atomic weapons by the United States, as well as its coordination of the differences between the United States and the United States. Chapter 4th, mainly discusses the British actions in the whole process from the armistice negotiations on June 1951 to the signing of the Korean Armistice Agreement on July 1953. From opening the door of armistice negotiations to advancing the peace talks until the resolution of the issue of prisoners of war, Britain has worked tirelessly for it. In conclusion, we draw the basic policy of Britain in the Korean War and the root of the policy. Although Britain played a positive role in the Korean War, But the decline in power has left Britain with only moderate, binding policies.
【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：K153

【相似文献】