日本近世关于伊势外宫地位的论争

发布时间：2018-03-25 13:23

  本文选题：伊势神宫　切入点：二宫一光论　出处：《日本问题研究》2014年04期

【摘要】：江户时代伊势神宫中的内外两宫围绕外宫的性质和地位高低问题发生过激烈的论战。外宫神职主张,外宫的祭神不仅是丰受大神,同时也是国常立尊和天御中主神,这样就赋予了丰受大神以祖先神的性质。外宫神职同时延续了中世的"二宫一光说",即认为两宫关系是阴与阳、水与火的二元关系,天照是二宫之通称。外宫据此谋求提高自身地位,达至与内宫地位对等。内宫方面则逐个反驳以上主张,否定外宫祭神是国常立尊,并彻底反对中国的阴阳思想。外宫在论战中的失败是追求地位对等与封建等级秩序之间的根本矛盾所决定的。
[Abstract]:During the Edo era, there was a heated debate about the nature and status of the echelon in the Yishi Shrine, which advocated that the worship of the Exotic Palace was not only a god of abundance and grandeur, but also a god of the state and the emperor of heaven. In this way, the nature of the deity of the ancestors was given to the god of Fengxue. The ministry of worship in the outer palace also continued the theory of "the first light of the second palace" in the Middle World, that is, the relationship between the two houses is the dualistic relationship between Yin and Yang, and between water and fire. Tianzhao is the general name of the second palace. According to this, the outer palace seeks to improve its own status, to the extent that it is equal to the status of the inner palace. The failure of the Outer Palace in the debate is determined by the fundamental contradiction between the pursuit of status equivalence and the feudal hierarchy order.
【作者单位】： 北京大学外国语学院;
【基金】：国家留学基金管理委员会“国际区域问题研究与外语高层次人才培养项目”(201306015001)
【分类号】：K313.3
，

本文编号：1663311