罗马帝国在西部的延续:东哥特政权研究

发布时间：2018-04-12 09:36

本文选题：罗马帝国 + 东哥特政权　；参考：《复旦大学》2014年博士论文

【摘要】：本文以东哥特政权作为研究对象,主要讨论的是5世纪后期和6世纪前期罗马帝国西部的政治史。本文将会基于这一时期丰富的史料来论证东哥特统治时期罗马帝国西部政权的延续。本文分为四个章节。本文第一章所探讨的是罗马人的蛮族观。本章试图说明,“罗马人”这一身份更多地是一种政治身份,这种身份可以包容种族、文化和地域上的差异。因此,“蛮族”和“罗马人”并不是两种完全对立的身份,只要符合一定的条件,蛮族也同样有可能成为罗马人,甚至还可能被看成是罗马人的典范。本文第二章论述的是东哥特政权建立前罗马帝国西部的历史环境。这一章中首先将会对5世纪后期罗马帝国西部的政治局势进行概述,并且在此基础上追溯“476年罗马帝国西部政权灭亡”这一观念形成的原因。本章试图说明,“476年西部政权灭亡”的观念和476年前后的实际情况并不相符,这也不是当时罗马人的认识。“476年灭亡论”的出现和476年以后罗马帝国东部与西部之间复杂的政治联系有关,其所针对的也是东哥特政权统治的合法性。本文第三章首先论述了东哥特政权建立的经过,然后集中讨论了东哥特政权在政治体制和统治措施上所展现的罗马特征。东哥特政权在罗马帝国西部的统治获得了罗马皇帝的认可,东哥特统治者尊奉罗马皇帝,并且沿袭了罗马帝国西部既有的政治体制,甚至还能够利用罗马传统来宣扬其统治的合法性。本章试图说明,东哥特统治者将自身视为罗马统治者,并且以罗马帝国的名义在进行统治。本文第四章从西部元老阶层的视角来探讨罗马人对东哥特政权的看法。这一章将会注重分析西部元老阶层对罗马帝国的认知,并且会将西部元老阶层理念中的罗马帝国和查士丁尼理念中的罗马帝国进行比较,从而展现出古典世界向中世纪基督教世界过渡阶段的一些特征。通过上述各章的论述,我们将会对5世纪后期和6世纪前期罗马帝国西部的历史有一个新的认识：在这个时代中,罗马帝国西部并没有因为“蛮族入侵”而走向衰亡,罗马的古典文化传统也仍然在延续。对罗马帝国及其所继承的古典文化传统来说,这并不是一个衰亡的时代,而是一个延续和转型的时代。
[Abstract]:This paper focuses on the political history of the western Roman Empire in the late 5th century and the early sixth century.Based on the abundant historical data of this period, this paper will demonstrate the continuation of the western regime of the Roman Empire during the period of Toggoth.This paper is divided into four chapters.The first chapter of this paper discusses the Roman view of the barbarian race.This chapter attempts to show that the Roman identity is more of a political identity that accommodates racial, cultural and geographical differences.Therefore, "barbarian" and "Roman" are not two completely opposite identities, so long as they meet certain conditions, the barbarian race may also become a Roman, or even be regarded as a Roman model.The second chapter deals with the historical environment of the western part of the Roman Empire.In this chapter, the political situation in the western part of the Roman Empire in the late 5th century will be summarized, and on this basis, the reasons for the formation of the concept of "the demise of the western regime of the Roman Empire in 476" will be traced back.This chapter attempts to explain that the idea of "the demise of the Western regime in 476" does not correspond to the actual situation around 476.This was not the knowledge of the Romans at that time. The appearance of "the death of 476" was related to the complicated political connection between the eastern and western parts of the Roman Empire after 476, and it was also aimed at the legitimacy of the rule of the Donggoth regime.The third chapter first discusses the process of the establishment of the Donggoth regime, and then focuses on the Roman characteristics of the Donggoth regime in the political system and ruling measures.The rule of the Eastern Gothic regime in the western part of the Roman Empire was recognized by the Roman emperors, who respected the Roman emperors and followed the established political system in the western part of the Roman Empire.Even the Roman tradition can be used to promote the legitimacy of its rule.This chapter attempts to show that the Toggoth rulers regard themselves as Roman rulers and rule in the name of the Roman Empire.The fourth chapter discusses the views of the Roman people on the Donggoth regime from the perspective of the western patriarchal class.This chapter will focus on the analysis of the western patriarchal class's perception of the Roman Empire, and will compare the Roman Empire in the idea of the Western Elders with the Roman Empire in the ideas of Justinian.Thus showing some characteristics of the transition from the classical world to the medieval Christian world.Through the above chapters, we will have a new understanding of the history of the western part of the Roman Empire in the late fifth and early sixth centuries: in this era, the western part of the Roman Empire did not decline and perish because of the "barbarian invasion".Roman classical cultural traditions also continue.For the Roman Empire and its heritage of classical culture, this is not an era of decline and death, but a time of continuity and transformation.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：K126

【参考文献】