多元文明的历史书写:历史回顾及理论思考

发布时间：2018-06-01 22:24

本文选题：多元文明史 + 书写　；参考：《历史教学(下半月刊)》2013年03期

【摘要】："文明"概念在18世纪下半叶只有单数形式,大约从1819年开始出现复数形式并随后得到广泛运用,以此为基础出现了一些文明史著作。基佐的《欧洲文明史》和巴克尔的《英国文明史》确立了文明史的基本框架,而斯宾格勒的《西方的没落》和汤因比的《历史研究》则开启了多元文明史书写的新探索。在汤因比影响下,出现了威廉·麦克尼尔以文明互动为主题的新世界史,以及杰里.本特利等人在全球化语境下对文明互动史的理论思考。文明史书写的历史演变路径表明,文明互动越来越成为多元文明史中的重要主题。笔者认为,多元文明史的书写首先应以各个文明为主体,把文明互动书写成主体间关系,这样才有可能避免书写中出现各种"中心主义"。
[Abstract]:The concept of "civilization" in the second half of the eighteenth Century had only a singular form, which began to appear in the plural form in 1819 and was then widely used. On the basis of this, some works of civilization have emerged. The history of civilization of Europe and Barker's history of civilization have established the basic framework of the history of civilization, and Spengler's "the decline of the west" and Toynbee's study of history has opened a new exploration of the history of multiple civilizations. Under the influence of Toynbee, there appeared a new world history of William McNeil's interaction as a theme, as well as the theoretical thinking of Jerry Bentley and others on the history of civilization interaction in the context of globalization. The historical evolution path of the writing of the history of the literary and Ming Dynasty shows that civilization is mutual. It has become an important theme in the history of multiple civilizations. I believe that the writing of the history of multiple civilizations should first take the various civilizations as the main body to write the interaction of civilizations into intersubjective relations, so that it is possible to avoid the emergence of various "centralism" in the writing.
【作者单位】：首都师范大学历史学院;
【基金】：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“世界历史进程中多元文明互动与共生研究”(批准号08JZD0037)的成果之一
【分类号】：K107

【参考文献】