“存亡歧路”抑或“话语权相争”——“丙子斥和”及“三学士”事件述评

发布时间：2018-06-30 10:04

本文选题：丙子斥和 + 三学士事件　；参考：《安徽史学》2014年02期

【摘要】："丙子之役"的爆发使朝鲜在义理与现实之间陷入了两难抉择,加速了主和派与斥和派的意见分化。与此同时,在这场"存亡歧路"的外交争辩中,"台阁"与"庙堂"的话语权矛盾也迅速突显。士林虽然是朝鲜公论政治的主体,但却无法摆脱"浮薄"的软肋。他们为国家高举了义理,却败倒在政争面前。虽然"三学士"的择选背后充斥着官员间互相倾轧乃至兵谏相逼的隐情,但是,朝廷以"浮议误国"取代"斥和误国"的论断,却在根本上肯定了义理,敷衍了清朝对于朝鲜反清言论的问责,以实际行动平息了朝野上下对于斥和论的非议。这就为协调战后各派间利益关系、加强国家政治稳定,提供了有利契机。
[Abstract]:The outbreak of "the Battle of the third son" made North Korea a dilemma between justice and reality, and accelerated the division of opinions between the principal and the repulsive. At the same time, in the diplomatic debate of "survival and death path", the contradiction between "Taige" and "temple" is also rapidly highlighted. Although Schilling is the subject of Korean public politics, he can not get rid of the weakness of "floating". They exalted justice for their country, but fell in front of political strife. Although the selection of "three Learners" is filled with the secret feelings of officials rolling against each other and even admonishing each other, however, the court's argument of "criticizing and mistreating the country" instead of "criticizing and mistaking the country" has fundamentally affirmed the principle of justice. Perfunctory Qing Dynasty for the North Korean anti-Qing statements accountability, with practical actions to quell the criticism of the opposition. This provides a favorable opportunity for reconciling the interests of the postwar factions and strengthening the country's political stability.
【作者单位】：山东大学历史文化学院;
【基金】：韩国韩国学中央研究院2011年度海外韩国学项目《仁祖时期义理论争与外交政策研究》的阶段性成果,项目编号为AKS—2011—R—07
【分类号】：K312.34

【参考文献】