丁应泰弹劾事件与明清史籍之建构

发布时间：2018-11-23 07:01

【摘要】：1598年正月,明经略杨镐指挥岛山之战,因进攻受挫而撤军。前往勘战的明兵部主事丁应泰偏信杨镐部属南兵将领之言,先弹劾杨镐,致使杨镐被罢;朝鲜国王李f为杨镐鸣不平,丁应泰再度赴朝,以《海东纪略》一书为据,再弹劾李f"诱倭入犯",李f再派陈情使前往辩诬,构成明代抗倭援朝战争中一个重要事件。此事件之根源,乃是明廷中主战派与主和派、首辅与次辅、南兵与北兵之争斗。可是,明清史籍却按照丁应泰的说法来叙述岛山之战的情形,贬低杨镐功绩,进而贬低明军在整个抗倭援朝战争中的战绩,原因乃是修《明神宗实录》者认为杨镐要为萨尔浒战争负责,故叙述岛山之战,也依从同样的思路,采纳丁应泰的说法,无视事实真相,这一基调竟然影响了明清史籍对整个战争的评价。朝鲜国王李f被弹劾,也反映了明鲜宗藩关系的复杂性。
[Abstract]:In the first month of 1598, Ming Jing Yang Ho commanded the Battle of the Island Mountain, and withdrew from the army because of the setback of the attack. Ding Yingtai, the chief officer of the Ming army department who went to the war, was partial to the words of Yang Ho, who was subordinate to the South Soldier, and impeached Yang Ho first, causing him to be dismissed. King Lee of the DPRK complained about Yang Ho, and Ding Ying-tai went to the DPRK again, based on a book called "Haidong Ji Li," and then impeached Li Fu-hui for "inducing Japanese invaders," and Lee Fan-chien again sent his case to argue against him, which constituted an important event in the Ming Dynasty's war against Japan to aid Korea. The root of this incident is the battle between the main and the Lord in the Ming Dynasty, the first and the second, and the struggle between the Southern and the Northern. However, the historical records of the Ming and Qing dynasties, according to Ding Ying-tai, described the situation of the war on the island mountain, belittled Yang Ho's achievements, and further reduced the Ming army's achievements in the entire war against Japan and Korea. The reason is that the people who revised the "Ming Shen Zong Shi" thought that Yang Ho was responsible for the Salhu War. Therefore, when describing the war on the island mountains, he followed the same thinking and adopted Ding Ying-tai 's statement, ignoring the truth of the facts. This tone actually affected the Ming and Qing dynasties history of the entire war evaluation. The impeachment of the Korean king Lee Fan-kun also reflects the complexity of Ming Hsien's Suzerain-vassal relationship.
【作者单位】：南开大学历史学院;
【基金】：中央高校基本科研业务专项资金项目(NKZXA10014)
【分类号】：K248;K312

【共引文献】