也从里耶简谈秦代乡啬夫与乡守:论基层管理的双头模式
本文选题:秦代 切入点:里耶简 出处:《史林》2013年01期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:秦代是否存在乡啬夫曾是个争议话题。2002年出土的里耶秦简证实了乡啬夫在秦代的存在,但也提出了新问题:秦代一乡之长到底是乡啬夫还是不为学界所熟悉的"乡守"?利用新发表的《里耶秦简(壹)》,结合岳麓秦简、张家山汉简、秦封泥及传世文献资料,或可对秦代基层管理曾采用双头模式加以论证:乡啬夫是名义上的一乡之长,而乡守实际上主管一乡事务。具体而言,在已发表的里耶简中,乡啬夫仅出现三次,并且无法推测其职掌。而与之形成鲜明对比的是,乡守大量出现,并主管一乡赋税、户籍、刑徒、民间财产转移登记、乡情汇报、为公家购买奴隶等乡政事务。证据表明,乡守和乡啬夫是并列、平行的关系,不互相隶属。故此可推测,当时曾采取双头模式。这种模式在汉初(张家山汉简的时代)就被废除,乡啬夫变身为名实兼具的、唯一的一乡之长。这提醒我们在理解"汉承秦制"时,不能忽视汉对秦制的改革,不能完全套用汉制来倒推记载不详的秦制。
[Abstract]:In 2002, Li Ye Qin bamboo slips unearthed confirmed the existence of townspeople in the Qin Dynasty, but also raised new questions: whether the growth of a township in the Qin Dynasty was a township miser or was it not known to the academic community as "keeping the countryside guard"??? With the newly published "Liya Qin slips (1)", combined with the Yuelu Qin slips, Zhangjiashan Han slips, Qin Feng Mud and the documents handed down from ancient times, it may be possible to demonstrate that the basic level management of the Qin Dynasty once adopted a double-headed model: the townspeople are nominally good at a township. In particular, in the published Liye Jane, the townspeople only appeared three times, and could not speculate on their duties. In contrast, the village guards appeared in large numbers and were in charge of the taxation and household registration of the first township. Criminal prisoners, civil property transfer registration, township affairs reporting, purchase of slaves for the public, etc. Evidence shows that village guards and townspeople are juxtaposed and parallel, not affiliated with each other. Therefore, it can be inferred that. At that time, the two-headed model was adopted. This model was abolished in the early Han Dynasty (the era of Zhangjiashan Han Bamboo slips), and the Xue Fu turned into both the name and the substance. This reminds us that when we understand the "Han inherited Qin system," The reform of Qin system in Han Dynasty can not be ignored.
【作者单位】: 华东师范大学思勉人文高等研究院;
【基金】:国家社科基金2011年青年项目“中国早期民法的诠释”资助
【分类号】:K877.5;K233
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 杨宗兵;里耶秦简县“守”、“丞”、“守丞”同义说[J];北方论丛;2004年06期
2 黄海烈;;里耶秦简与秦地方官制[J];北方论丛;2005年06期
3 卜宪群;;秦汉之际乡里吏员杂考——以里耶秦简为中心的探讨[J];南都学坛;2006年01期
4 刘乐贤;;里耶秦简和孔家坡汉简中的职官省称[J];文物;2007年09期
5 于振波;;秦律令中的“新黔首”与“新地吏”[J];中国史研究;2009年03期
6 陈治国;;里耶秦简“守”和“守丞”释义及其他[J];中国历史文物;2006年03期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周晓陆;秦封泥所见安徽史料考[J];安徽大学学报;2003年03期
2 沈晋贤;从巫祝用“土”到以“土”为药论——兼论马王堆医书巫祝用土[J];安徽大学学报;2004年06期
3 刘信芳;;古文字歧读释例[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年05期
4 张振谦;;齐系陶文考释[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年04期
5 刘晓满;卜宪群;;秦汉行政中的效率规定与问责[J];安徽史学;2012年02期
6 陈晶;;对秦简中赀甲盾缴纳形式的再认识[J];安徽文学(下半月);2008年02期
7 刘莉;;论《包山楚简》133号简文“诰”字的改释[J];安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版);2012年02期
8 杨宗兵;里耶秦简县“守”、“丞”、“守丞”同义说[J];北方论丛;2004年06期
9 于,
本文编号:1607779
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zggdslw/1607779.html