汉代田庄研究

发布时间：2018-03-17 16:23

本文选题：汉代　切入点：田庄　出处：《山东大学》2005年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：田庄是汉代社会地主阶级经营地产的一种生产组织形式,它以大土地所有制为基础,以超经济人身强制的劳役地租或实物地租为剥削形态,有着严密的生产管理体系,是能够自给自足的进行生产、生活的经济实体。田庄大约产生于西汉前期,它是社会生产力发展的结果。它产生的基础是私有大地产和依附人口。汉代田庄的生产,无论是农业生产还是手工业生产,都是多样化的,并在生产中实行集约化的协作劳动。田庄的商品经济活动十分活跃,由于田庄的经营方式和汉代的政策的影响形成了内、外两个并行的市场。田庄内部市场的交易主要是为了满足田庄内部日常生活的需要,田庄同外部市场的交易则主要是为了获得货币和增值。田庄主是田庄宗族的大家长和田庄统治的核心。在田庄的劳动者中,宗族、宾客、徒附的身份是国家的编户齐民,但他们对田庄主存在着依附性。部曲是田庄中的私人武装。田庄在汉代经济结构和社会结构中占有重要地位。田庄既有田庄主对田庄内的劳动者进行残酷剥削,作为割据势力的政治支柱和经济基础的一面;也有适合生产力发展,促进社会经济进步的一面。本文共分三大部分。引言部分主要说明汉代田庄是一个客观存在的事实,并介绍目前学界对汉代田庄的研究状况,阐述选题的原因、意义。主体部分从六个方面分析说明汉代田庄产生的时间与基础,田庄的基本情况,田庄的地位与影响: 1.通过分析出土文物和史料记载的情况说明在西汉前期就已出现田庄,指出田庄产生的基础是私有土地和依附人口,并分析说明田庄主获得土地的主要途径和田庄人口的主要来源。 2.分析说明在汉代建立田庄的主要是贵族、官僚、富商等豪强地主,他们的田庄建筑宏大,布局合理,为了安全的需要还大建坞堡。 3.说明田庄中农业和手工业经营的状况,并从田庄的经营方式和汉代的政策两方面详细分析阐明田庄为什么不可能是一种封闭式的经济状态,而是存在着内、外两个并行的市场。
[Abstract]:Grange is a form of production organization of real estate management by the social landlord class in the Han Dynasty. It is based on large land ownership and exploits in the form of forced servile land rent or physical land rent, which has a strict production management system. It is an economic entity capable of producing and living on a self-sufficient basis. The Grange was produced approximately in the early Western Han Dynasty, as a result of the development of social productive forces. It was based on private large real estate and dependent population. The production of the Grange in the Han Dynasty, Both agricultural and handicraft production are diversified, and intensive cooperative labour is carried out in the production. The commodity economy of the Grange is very active, which has been formed due to the influence of the Grange's management mode and the policies of the Han Dynasty. The trading in the Grange's internal market is mainly to meet the daily needs of the Grange's daily life. The trade between the farm and the outside market is mainly for the gain of money and appreciation. The owner of the farm is the big parent of the family and the core of the Grange rule. Among the labourers of the farm, the clan, the guests, and the consort are the creators and the people of the country. However, they were attached to the owner of the Grange. The Ministry qu was the private arm of the Grange. The Grange played an important role in the economic and social structure of the Han Dynasty. The owner of the Grange made cruel exploitation of the workers in the Grange. As the political pillar and economic foundation of the separatist forces, there is also a side suitable for the development of productive forces and the promotion of social and economic progress. This paper is divided into three parts. The introduction mainly explains the fact that the Grange in Han Dynasty is an objective fact, and introduces the current research situation of the Grange in the Han Dynasty, and expounds the reason and significance of the selected topic. The main part analyzes and explains the time and foundation of the production of the Grange in the Han Dynasty, the basic situation of the Grange, the status and influence of the Grange from six aspects. 1. Through the analysis of excavated cultural relics and historical records, it was indicated that Grange had already appeared in the early period of the Western Han Dynasty, pointing out that the Grange was based on private land and dependent population. The main ways to obtain land and the main source of land population are analyzed. 2.The analysis shows that in the Han Dynasty, the main people who set up the Grange were aristocrats, bureaucrats, rich merchants and other powerful landlords. Their farms were large in architecture and reasonable in layout, and the docking bunkers were built for the sake of safety. 3. Explain the situation of agriculture and handicraft operation in the Grange, and explain in detail why the Grange cannot be a closed economic state, but the existence of the Grange, from the two aspects of the Grange management mode and the policy of the Han Dynasty. Two parallel markets.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2005
【分类号】：K234

【引证文献】