点校本《辽史》纠误二则
发布时间:2018-04-30 14:11
本文选题:《辽史》 + 详稳司 ; 参考:《中国史研究》2013年02期
【摘要】:正中华书局点校本《辽史》卷二七《天祚皇帝纪》天庆二年(1112)九月己未条记阿骨打起兵之事,云:"女直赵三、阿鹘产拒之,阿骨打虏其家属。二人走诉咸州,详稳司送北枢密院。枢密使萧奉先作常事以闻上,仍送咸州诘责,欲使自新。"按,此段史文标点恐误。首先,据《辽史》卷四六《百官志》"北面边防官"条,长春路设有咸州兵马详稳司,盖即咸州详稳司,本系一军事机构,控御包括女真在内的东北诸部族。其次,从《辽史》与《契丹国志》的史源关系看,前者这段史料当取资后者卷一○《天祚皇帝上》天庆二年条,原文谓赵三、阿鹘产"二人来诉于咸州详稳司送北枢密院"云云;参酌天庆三年日:"阿骨打将带五百余骑,径赴咸州详稳司,吏民惊骇。"由此可见,"咸州详稳司"当做一词理解,然点校本《辽史》原断于"咸州"下,而"详稳司"属下读,是有不妥,并且"送北枢密院"旬下不应为
[Abstract]:Zhonghua Book Co., Ltd. "Liaoshi" Scroll. 27, Emperor Tianzuo, the second year of Tianqing, 1112) September has not recorded the incident of Agu beating up the army, cloud: "female Zhizhao three, a Uighur property refused, A Guda took his family." The two men went to the North Privy Council. Xiao, who is a secret officer, has done his best to hear about it, but he still sends Xianzhou to blame him for remaking himself. " Press, this paragraph of historical punctuation should be mistaken. First of all, according to the "Northern Frontier Guard Officer" section in Volume 46 of "History of Liao Dynasty", there are Xianzhou soldiers and horses in Changchun Road, and Xianzhou, Xianzhou, Xianzhou, as well as a military organization, which controls the control of the tribes in the Northeast, including Nu Zhen. Secondly, from the perspective of the historical source relationship between Liao Shi and Qidan State Records, the former period of historical data should be invested in the latter part of the second year of Tianqing, the original text is called Zhao San, A Uighur production, "two people came to the Xianzhou to send the North Privy Council," and so on; Diaojiying3 days: "A Guda will take more than 500 riding, to go to Xianzhou Shouji, officials and people horrified." Thus, it can be seen that the term "Xianzhou detailed and stable Secretary" is understood as a word, but the original "History of Liao Dynasty" was cut off under "Xianzhou", and the subordinate of "Xianzhou" was wrong to read, and "sent to the North Privy Council" should not be given for ten days.
【作者单位】: 北京大学历史学系;
【分类号】:K246.1;G256
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 马洪路;《辽史》补正三则[J];社会科学辑刊;1982年05期
2 汤开建;《辽史》勘误一则[J];史学集刊;1983年01期
3 王希安;《辽史》传论的文化性质初探[J];辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2000年04期
4 曹锋,张沛U,
本文编号:1824866
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zggdslw/1824866.html