金朝“异代”文士与皇权政治互动关系研究

发布时间:2018-06-01 20:55

  本文选题:金朝 + 文士 ; 参考:《中央民族大学》2006年博士论文


【摘要】:本文从金朝“异代”文士与皇权政治互动的视角,研究辽宋文士对金朝社会进步的贡献及政治环境对他们的塑造。皇权、皇权政治在女真社会的出现是历史的进步,有赖于“异代”文士的推动;金朝的皇权政治脱胎于民主议事的贵族政治,,皇权与贵族既斗争又联合,“异代”文士斡旋其中,推动政治又困于政治,导致他们的政治境遇扑朔迷离。全文共分四章,初步地研究辽东文士、燕云文士、两宋文士及文士家族群带关系与金朝皇权、皇权政治的互动关系。 第一章:通过对女真人建国历史背景的研究,针对阿骨打“以都勃极烈嗣大位”的历史悬疑,根据历史资料与北方民族共同的文化心理,初步认识到,在女真民族文化视野中,都勃极烈可与中原王朝的皇帝相匹。通过都勃极烈与皇帝关系的梳理,进而提出“收国”是阿骨打称都勃极烈时期的年号。对刘浦江先生关于金朝开国史真实性的质疑,提出了一种阐释;澄清了杨朴在阿骨打称帝历史中的贡献,并探讨了《金史》不为其立传的政治因素。杨朴劝阿骨打称帝在贵族政治中埋下了变革的种子,与捍卫贵族政治的渤海另一文士高庆裔,从不同的出发点影响皇权政治的进步。 第二章:阿骨打率军进入燕云地区,注定了金朝发展封建制度的必然。燕云文士凭籍仕辽的经验,把握金初政治走向,是女真人发展取向选择的有力推动者。他们捭阖于贵族与皇权之间,以保境安民为己任,引导女真贵族转变观念。女真贵族的信任使之多居枢要,韩企先为相近二十年,参与关决大政,立“难言”之功;韩f 为帝王之师,力图把金熙宗培养成“汉人天子”,但受制于政治环境,他只能传授给他王观念,而不能给予他实际权力,精神与现实的错位,使熙宗的政治行为日趋颓废,韩f 匡救无措。 第三章:两宋文士多种渠道入仕金朝,宋与金在文化、制度上的差距,反映在文士身上,便是对金朝政治的不相容性。仕进的政治态度错综复杂,多数人不约而同地经历了抵触、彷徨、无奈。即使仕于金朝,内心的矛盾也
[Abstract]:From the perspective of the interaction between the scholars of the Jin Dynasty and the imperial power, this paper studies the contribution of the scholars of Liao and Song dynasties to the social progress of the Jin Dynasty and the shaping of them by the political environment. The emergence of imperial power politics in the Nuzhen society is the progress of history and depends on the promotion of the scholars of "different generations." the imperial power politics of the Jin Dynasty was born out of the aristocratic politics of democratic deliberation, and the imperial power and the aristocracy both struggle and unite. The interludes of different generations of scribes, which pushed politics and trapped in politics, caused their political situation to be complicated. The full text is divided into four chapters, and preliminarily studies the interaction between the scholars of Liaodong, Yan Yun, the scholars of Song Dynasty and the clan group of literati and the imperial power and imperial power politics of Jin Dynasty. The first chapter: through the research on the historical background of the founding of the nation of the real woman, aiming at the historical suspense of Aguda's "taking the place of the great heir of the Duboji martyr", and according to the historical data and the common cultural psychology of the northern nationalities, it is preliminarily realized that, in the view of the national culture of Nu Zhen, Dupo was strong enough to match the emperors of the Central Plains. Through combing the relationship between Dubozhili and the emperor, the author put forward that "the country of capture" was the year of Aguda's period. This paper puts forward a kind of explanation to Mr. Liu Pujiang's questioning of the authenticity of the founding history of the Jin Dynasty, clarifies Yang Pu's contribution in the history of Aguda's reign as emperor, and probes into the political factors that "Jin Shi" does not pass on for him. Yang Pu advised Aguda to become emperor in the aristocratic politics and planted the seeds of change, which influenced the progress of imperial power politics from different starting point, compared with Gao Qing people, another scholar in Bohai Sea who defended the aristocratic politics. The second chapter: Agu beat army into the Yanyun area, doomed the Jin Dynasty to develop the feudal system inevitable. Yan Yun literati, based on the experience of Liao Dynasty, grasped the political trend in the early Jin Dynasty, and was a powerful promoter of the choice of the female real person's development orientation. They manoeuvred between the aristocrat and the imperial power to protect the territory and the people as their own responsibility to guide the transformation of the concept of the aristocrat. The trust of the Nuzhen aristocrat led to a great deal of success. Han Kei was close to him for 20 years, participated in the decision of the Great Government, and made the feat of "unspeakable"; Han f was the emperors' teacher who tried to cultivate Jin Xizong as the "son of the Han people", but he was constrained by the political environment. He could only impart to him the concept of king, but could not give him actual power, the dislocation of spirit and reality, which made Xizong's political behavior decadent day by day, and Han f was unable to rescue him. Chapter three: the political incompatibility of the Jin Dynasty is reflected in the cultural and institutional gap between the Song Dynasty and the Jin Dynasty. The political attitude of official advance is complicated, most people have experienced conflict, hesitation and helplessness. Even in the Jin Dynasty, the innermost contradictions
【学位授予单位】:中央民族大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2006
【分类号】:K246.4

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 董克昌;关于评价完颜亮的几个问题[J];北方文物;1987年04期

2 肖民;也论完颜亮——兼与《完颜亮论》作者商榷[J];北方文物;1989年04期

3 徐松巍,史小云,聂红云;对完颜亮研究的回顾与反思——兼及历史人物评价问题[J];北方文物;1992年02期

4 杨果;金代翰林与政治[J];北方文物;1994年04期

5 孟东风;金代女真人的汉化与民族融合[J];东北师大学报;1994年06期

6 刘浦江;关于金朝开国史的真实性质疑[J];历史研究;1998年06期

7 董四礼;试论金天会十年的皇储之争[J];求是学刊;1989年03期

8 刘光永;;吴晗对封建皇权的剖析[J];求索;2005年12期

9 苏金源;论完颜阿骨打的政治、经济改革[J];史学集刊;1982年02期

10 杨保隆;试谈金代废除勃极烈制度的最初动因[J];社会科学战线;1994年01期



本文编号:1965596

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zggdslw/1965596.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户5aea6***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com