唐太宗贞观十一年立法研究——以《贞观式》有无之悬疑为中心

发布时间：2018-06-04 02:41

本文选题：贞观式 + 律令格式　；参考：《文史哲》2014年06期

【摘要】：唐太宗贞观十一年立法,所颁行的是《律》、《令》、《格》,但并不包括《贞观式》和《留司格》,以《旧唐书·刑法志》为典型的一组史料之所以发生贞观已有"《留司格》一卷"和"《式》三十三篇"的错误,是因为它们依据的是一个夹注混为正文的《国史》文本。两《唐书·刑法志》、《新唐书·艺文志》和《册府元龟·刑法部》等处关于贞观十一年与《律》、《令》、《格》一起颁行了《式》的记载,都存在着因其所据文本有误而倒错了开元与贞观时代的问题,是断然无法成立的。正由于此,《唐会要》述当时只施行了《律》、《令》、《格》而不及于《式》,《唐六典》关于"皇朝"之《格》始于贞观而《式》则始于永徽的记叙,就更显其准确而值得采信了。贞观十一年确未制行过《式》,但以"式"来指称某些规范的习惯和对各种诏令的审定编纂,则出现了新的趋向,《永徽式》的制定和《律》、《令》、《格》、《式》并行体系的诞生,即是承此发展的结果。
[Abstract]:In 11 years, Taizong Taizong legislated on Zhenguan, What is issued is "Law", "order", "character", but does not include "Chastika style" and "Liushi GE". A group of historical materials typical of the Book of Criminal Law of the Old Tang Dynasty have occurred the errors of "one volume" and "< type > 33 articles" in the view of chastity. Because they are based on a mixed text of the National History. The two "chronicles of Criminal Law of the Tang Dynasty", "the Art of the New Tang Dynasty" and "the Ministry of Criminal Law of Yuan Tortoise of the Yuan Dynasty", and so on, together with the "Law", the "order" and the "style", issued the record of "style" together. Because its text is wrong and wrong Kaiyuan and Zhenguan times, it is absolutely impossible to establish. Because of this, the Tang Dynasty will only implement the "law", < order >, < order >, but not < style >, the "Tang Liu Dian" about the "imperial dynasty" < style > started from the Zhenguan and the "style" began in the description of the Emblem, it is even more accurate and worthy of credit. It is true that Zhenguan did not practice "style" in 11 years, but "style" is used to refer to the habits of certain norms and the examination and compilation of various kinds of imperial edict, there is a new trend. The formulation of "eternal emblem" and the "law", the birth of a parallel system of "order", "formality", "style", "style >," It is the result of this development.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院历史研究所;
【分类号】：K242

【参考文献】