建安学术史研究
[Abstract]:This paper takes the academic study of Jianan as the research object, and tries to make a systematic study of Jianan's academic work.
The Jian'an Period (196-219) was an important stage in the middle ancient history of China. The Eastern Han Dynasty was famous for its existence, and the trinity of the Three Kingdoms gradually took shape. In the process of the state from unification to division, the change of political order and the change of governing methods had a profound impact on people's academic orientation.
From the development of academic history, this period is a transitional period from the Han Dynasty to the Wei and Jin Dynasties. People's concepts have changed and different systems of knowledge have been re-integrated. Home, Yin-Yang home and so on all have certain performance in this period.
In ancient China, scholars paid more attention to the study of Confucianism, which was relatively undeveloped in this period, leading to the weakness of later generations. Although scholars in Qing Dynasty and modern times had been involved in the study of Confucianism, such as Zheng Xuan, there were many scholars in Han Dynasty. However, they still lay particular stress on the study of the methods and annotations of the Han Dynasty.
In the pre-Qin Dynasty, with the gradual loss of control of the Zhou Dynasty, the academic situation of the decline of the imperial officials and the rise of the scholars appeared.
In the late Eastern Han Dynasty, the trivialization of Confucian classics, the eunuch's attack, the development of commodity economy and other factors led to the decline of Confucian classics and the emergence of pluralistic ideas. In the declining period of Confucianism, a new academic pattern is taking shape. The class of eunuchs, the class of Party members and the ordinary scholars in Jian'an period represent different academic and cultural orientations. Differentiation has also brought about profound changes in the field of social thought. Taoism has been revived as a new salvation thought. Folk Taoism, which has an indissoluble bond with Taoism, has also been developed. Legalism, as an effective practical thought in dealing with troubled times, has also been paid attention to during the Jian'an Period. As a result, great changes have taken place in the knowledge structure, academic methods and academic purport of scholars. Some scholars have attached great importance to the practical study of talent and art in the knowledge structure. In the period of Jian'an, though the study of Confucian classics was still in Jing and Jiao'erzhou, it was not the mainstream of the study of Confucian classics in the period of Jian'an. In the period of Jian'an, scholars paid more and more attention to the study of Confucian classics, and the rulers paid more attention to merits and less attention to the policy of magnificence. It also promotes the practicality and extensiveness of the academic field. This makes the academic scope of the Jian'an period break away from the fence of Confucianism, showing a trend of expansion.
The academic development of Jian'an was different from that of the Eastern Han Dynasty because of the change of academic pattern in the period of Jian'an.
Liang Xue and others are in an unsustainable state. On the contrary, Yi's learning is due to its special function.
Mencius'thought of people-oriented is closely related to the times. Historiography is attached great importance to because of its close combination with the times.
Shi Jian can be provided by the rulers and scholars of the Three Kingdoms. Although they did not appear, such as Sima Qian and Ban Gu, they were created.
Sexual works, but the deletion of previous history and private writing by various authors undoubtedly promote the prosperity of historiography.
In the period of the Han Dynasty, Xun Yue has become the source of academic innovation.
Though relying heavily on pre Qin scholars to elucidate and polish them, they can integrate the thoughts of pre Qin philosophers into the times.
Giving the new content to the traditional thought has also created academic innovation.
However, this period has been taken seriously.
In the years of Jianan, when scholars were learning to decline, a group of outstanding scholars still appeared.
The integration of Confucian classics, or the study of real politics, together builds the building of Jianan academic.
Zheng Xuan, he Xiu, Cai Yao, Ying Fu and so on represented the last glory of Confucian Studies in the Eastern Han Dynasty, and Zheng Xuan's ancient prose classics
He made a comprehensive summary and realized the academic goal of unifying Confucian classics; he Hsu took the stand of respecting the present and suppressing the old.
The classic value has made further efforts: CAI has learned from the broader academic level of Dian, style and historiography.
We should comprehensively interpret traditional ideas, and help to interpret traditional ethics from the unique academic perspective of positive customs.
In the same way as Zheng, how to summarize Confucian classics, academic circles gradually emerged Confucianism, Taoism, and law.
In a furnace, the trend of miscellaneous family is becoming more and more complicated. Zhong Chang Tong and Xun Yue are typical representatives of this new academic change.
In the Qin Dynasty's thought, we drew lessons from it, and made specific and concrete explanations for the ruling state.
The society and later generations are very valuable social and political propositions, their academic representative of the period of prominent scholarship.
It is continuing to develop, but there has also been a pragmatic trend. Liu Xi and Kong Rong are representatives of Neo Confucian Studies in this period.
Xi's interpretation of classics and the names of utensils opened up a new field of natural history in the study of Confucian classics.
New explanations of the theory are both traditional and radical.
Point of view.
With the continuous development of the academic trend of thought, the trend of convergence in academic field is more significant.
There is also a trend towards specialization in academic studies. Meanwhile, academic styles also vary from region to region.
The diversification of academic field.
【学位授予单位】:扬州大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2004
【分类号】:K234
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 ;中国学术史研究的主要形式[J];文史知识;2009年04期
2 王彦辉;;引领学术方向是著述学术史的唯一宗旨[J];史学月刊;2011年01期
3 翟景运;凸显特色与学术胸怀[J];云梦学刊;2005年06期
4 余三定;当代学术史研究的学术积累——当代学术史著作评述之二[J];云梦学刊;2005年04期
5 戴建业;;别忘了祖传秘方[J];读书;2006年01期
6 魏开琼;矫正学术失范,关注当代学术史的发展[J];云梦学刊;2005年04期
7 戴海斌;研究视野需要拓展,但不是泛化[J];云梦学刊;2005年06期
8 吴岳添;;“外国文学学术史研究工程·经典作家系列”课题结项会在京召开[J];外国文学研究;2010年06期
9 汤凌云;“当代学术史”学科建设研讨会在北京召开[J];云梦学刊;2005年04期
10 颜敏;;卷首[J];创作评谭;2005年10期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 胡文生;;浅析经学在前近代的变动[A];中国近现代史及史料征集研究(二)——中国近现代史史料学学会学术会议论文集[C];2002年
2 王德胜;;美学:知识背景及其他——对百年中国美学学术特性的一种思考[A];中华美学学会第五届全国美学会议论文集[C];1999年
3 傅俊;;发现问题:学术史研究的方法与意义——浙江大学历史系举办宋史专业研究生讲习班(第一期)[A];中国宋史研究会——唐宋经济史高层研讨会论文集[C];2004年
4 王绍玺;;浅谈汉代经学框定的传统思维定势——思维问题学习笔记之一[A];《思维科学与21世纪》学术研讨会论文集[C];2010年
5 周予同;;朱熹之经学[A];朱熹与中国文化——武夷山朱熹研究中心成立大会论文集[C];1988年
6 ;前言[A];中国造纸学报2003年增刊——中国造纸学会第十一届学术年会论文集[C];2003年
7 包丹丹;;试论口述史何以应用到教育学术史中[A];第二届首都高校教育学研究生学术论坛论文集[C];2011年
8 彭邦本;;《十批判书》中的儒学研究——学术史视阈中的郭沫若[A];郭沫若研究三十年[C];2008年
9 王建平;曾华;;美国战后中国学[A];辽宁省哲学社会科学获奖成果汇编(2003—2004年度)[C];2003年
10 叶光寒;;论魏源书法的形态美学与养生[A];第四届国学国医岳麓论坛——中医治未病与亚健康暨第二届亚健康经络调理学术研讨会精选论文集[C];2010年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 北京大学中文系教授 陈平原 教育部社政司 田敬诚 《北京大学学报》主编 程郁缀 《社会科学报》总编 许明 《社会科学管理与评论》杂志社 张国春 南京大学 叶继元 北京大学 贺卫方 龙协涛 清华大学 许章润 中国社会科学院 邢东田;学术史研究:从一个“随想”到一个学科[N];社会科学报;2005年
2 本报记者 杜悦;当代学术史研究:以问题为中心[N];中国教育报;2009年
3 余晶;《当代学术史研究》简评[N];人民日报;2009年
4 刘荣林;加强当代学术史研究[N];文艺报;2009年
5 杜晓勤 北京大学;当代学术史研究的奠基工程[N];中国社会科学报;2011年
6 陈峰;“五朵金花”的学术史解析[N];中华读书报;2011年
7 钟兴永;关注学科个性 总结学术范式[N];中国社会科学院院报;2006年
8 周云龙;“原典”与“原点”的意义[N];中华读书报;2010年
9 曹 芊;明代学术史研究的新高度[N];中华读书报;2000年
10 钟兴永;以问题为中心[N];文艺报;2006年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 徐俊祥;建安学术史研究[D];扬州大学;2004年
2 王长顺;生态学视野下的西汉文学研究[D];陕西师范大学;2011年
3 刘再华;晚清时期的文学与经学[D];复旦大学;2003年
4 庄乾竹;古代消渴病学术史研究[D];中国中医科学院;2006年
5 孙纪文;《淮南子》研究[D];福建师范大学;2004年
6 陆建猷;《四书集注》与南宋四书学[D];西北大学;1999年
7 犹家仲;《诗经》的解释学研究[D];北京大学;2000年
8 李卫军;《左传》评点研究[D];华东师范大学;2008年
9 蒋伟胜;习学成德[D];复旦大学;2006年
10 柳宏;清代《论语》诠释史论[D];扬州大学;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 王有红;俞樾传统学术研究[D];西北大学;2004年
2 艾春明;论《韩诗外传》的经学价值[D];东北师范大学;2002年
3 王蕾;两汉复仇风俗研究[D];山东大学;2010年
4 逯万军;略论东汉前期的经学[D];郑州大学;2002年
5 范正娥;两汉太学研究[D];华中师范大学;2004年
6 于利;魏晋律学研究[D];中国政法大学;2005年
7 王晓敏;唐代《左传》学研究[D];河南大学;2005年
8 范艳君;《崇文总目》与学术史研究[D];吉林大学;2008年
9 胡明;汉元帝时期的经学与政治[D];郑州大学;2003年
10 李绍萍;论《焦氏易林》与先秦两汉文学的融会贯通[D];福建师范大学;2004年
本文编号:2197144
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zggdslw/2197144.html