先秦秦汉统一思想形成研究
[Abstract]:The unification of pre-Qin and Qin and Han dynasties in China was a process of change and development. The Zhou Dynasty was the first dynasty in China to be called a unified dynasty, and it was also the first period of the formation of the unified thought in China. The Qin Dynasty was the first unified centralized country in China, but the Qin Dynasty failed to form a unified thought, while the Han Dynasty 471 years (Bao Xinmang regime and Shu Han regime) was the formation and maturity of China's new unified thought (different from the Western Zhou Dynasty). Therefore, this paper intends to use time as a gradient in the process of writing, divided into five parts. The first part is about the thought of unification of pre-Qin Dynasty. This paper mainly studies the unified thought of Zhou Dynasty, and thinks that the unified thought formed in Zhou Dynasty is not the unified thought of the whole people, it is only owned by the rulers, it can be said that the unity of the Zhou Dynasty is the unity between the regime and the political power, which is limited to the rulers. So when the royal family fell, the unity based on the patriarchal system collapsed with the collapse of the patriarchal system. On the surface, this is the destruction of unity and unity, but the struggle for power, land and so on promotes the further development of unity and unity. The second part is about Qin Dynasty. This paper mainly analyzes the causes of the failure of Qin Dynasty and lays the groundwork for the formation of the unified thought in the new period. Although the Qin Dynasty failed to form a unified thought, it was extremely successful in transforming the heterogeneous culture of Bashu. Compared to the rule of the six Kingdoms, this rule is caused by inaction, not by unification in the law. Due to the one-sided emphasis on "unification in the law" in the six countries, Qin Dynasty ignored the gap caused by the separation for hundreds of years, so that it was regarded as "tyranny" to pay for unification. The third part is about the five-year Chu-Han War. Comparing the history of Zhou Dynasty 800 years with the history of Qin Dynasty 15 years we can judge which system is more favorable to rule. But the success and failure of Zhou's implementation of the seal is beyond the understanding of the Xiang Yu, so the Xiang Yu seems to have failed quickly because of its lack of foundation. The fourth part of the Western Han Dynasty, the Eastern Han Dynasty, the three countries together to make a brief explanation of the unity of thought. The unsuccessful unification of China in the Qin Dynasty provided a reference for the Western Han Dynasty to unify and govern China successfully, and provided a platform for the formation of the unified thought of the Western Han Dynasty. The formation of the unity of the Western Han Dynasty mainly from the top, middle, the next three levels to explain. After the Western Han Dynasty, the Eastern Han Dynasty itself is a unified regime surnamed Liu, which shows that the unified thought formed in the Western Han Dynasty has already begun to be carried out, while the uprising war at the end of the Eastern Han Dynasty has made up some deficiencies of the three levels of unified thought in the Western Han Dynasty. Although the three countries split, but this division is originally a form of unity, because they are on the basis of a common unity of thought. The fifth part mainly analyzes the two conditions under which China can form a unified idea. One natural condition is the common agricultural cultural circle. Although the agricultural gap between the north and the south of China is quite large, it is easy to get the approval between the north and the south because the agricultural areas between the north and the south are used as a link between the two seasons of agriculture, coupled with the progress of the means of production. The second is the human condition, that is, the common understanding of the ancestor. Before the warring States period, people were concerned about the ancient history.
【学位授予单位】:陕西师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2006
【分类号】:K224;K232
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王启才;先秦奏议探寻[J];档案学研究;2005年03期
2 周均平;;审美走向自觉——论秦汉审美文化的历史地位[J];山东社会科学;2010年01期
3 薛瑞泽;先秦秦汉河洛地区的冶铸业[J];四川文物;2001年03期
4 肖煜;;时代愈近纳贤愈少?[J];读书;1985年01期
5 秦闻一;先秦诸子的谈判理论与实践(上)[J];许昌师专学报;1998年02期
6 张涅;先秦的法治主义和术治主义[J];浙江社会科学;1999年05期
7 尤学工;先秦史官与史学[J];史学史研究;2001年04期
8 赵建功;先秦儒家易学略论[J];华中科技大学学报(社会科学版);2002年06期
9 陆宇澄;论原始社会至先秦时期装饰观念的发展[J];苏州大学学报(工科版);2003年06期
10 马青梅;拉玛杰;;浅谈先秦两汉时期我国的漆器工艺[J];青海师范大学民族师范学院学报;2003年01期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 顾森;;秦汉美术思想缉要[A];中国汉画学会第九届年会论文集(下)[C];2004年
2 高荣;;秦汉邮书档案管理制度初探[A];第二届郭煌历史档案与徽州历史档案开发利用研讨会论文集[C];2002年
3 吴国武;;略论先秦宗族教育对私学形成的影响——以鲁国三桓之族为例[A];纪念《教育史研究》创刊二十周年论文集(3)——中国教育制度史研究[C];2009年
4 肖世孟;;先秦“青”色考[A];“特殊与一般——美术史论中的个案与问题”第五届全国高校美术史学年会会议论文集[C];2011年
5 ;《秦汉三国两晋南北朝货币》[A];上海市社会科学界联合会2003年学术研讨会论文集[C];2003年
6 黄朴民;;秦汉文化的时代精神[A];秦都咸阳与秦文化研究——秦文化学术研讨会论文集[C];2001年
7 后晓荣;陈晓飞;;秦汉雍五ud地望新探[A];秦文化论丛(第十辑)[C];2003年
8 张传玺;;秦汉中央集权制的“公天下”因素[A];北京论坛(2006)文明的和谐与共同繁荣——对人类文明方式的思考:“世界格局中的中华文明”国学分论坛论文或摘要集[C];2006年
9 黄才庚;;秦汉时的驿传制度考略[A];中国长城博物馆暨中国长城学会优秀文集[C];2005年
10 后晓荣;;秦汉雍五ud地望新探[A];秦都咸阳与秦文化研究——秦文化学术研讨会论文集[C];2001年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 苏赵李;咸阳周凌附近发现秦汉壕沟[N];新华每日电讯;2004年
2 吴又华;师法秦汉品自高[N];美术报;2001年
3 艳红;秦汉法典体系的演变[N];中国社会科学院院报;2004年
4 特约记者 马献伦 通讯员 汪文正;郧县出土罕见秦汉转型墓[N];湖北日报;2008年
5 记者王燕萍;最新出土秦汉文物精品首展香港[N];人民日报海外版;2002年
6 陈松长 岳麓书院;秦代避讳的新材料[N];中国社会科学报;2009年
7 本报记者 陶世安;秦汉至元明 考古成果丰[N];人民日报海外版;2002年
8 记者 杨世华 特约通讯员 黄猛高;秦汉浩淼大湖牛年再现三水[N];南方日报;2009年
9 本报记者 陶世安;秦汉至元明 考古成果丰(上)[N];人民日报海外版;2002年
10 徐向明;海关关税始秦汉[N];中国财经报;2004年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 上官绪智;秦汉军队后勤保障问题研究[D];华中师范大学;2004年
2 潘俊杰;先秦杂家研究[D];西北大学;2005年
3 翟建宏;管子经济思想研究[D];郑州大学;2005年
4 戴庞海;先秦冠礼研究[D];郑州大学;2005年
5 皮伟兵;先秦儒家“和”政治伦理思想研究[D];湖南师范大学;2006年
6 王永平;先秦的卜筮与《周易》研究[D];吉林大学;2007年
7 庞天佑;秦汉魏晋南北朝历史哲学思想研究[D];郑州大学;2000年
8 程远;先秦战争观研究[D];西北大学;2005年
9 温乐平;秦汉社会消费问题研究[D];华中师范大学;2005年
10 夏保国;先秦舆论思想探源[D];吉林大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 吴庆敏;试论先秦至秦汉士人精神[D];陕西师范大学;2009年
2 苏莉;秦汉纪时制度研究[D];安徽大学;2012年
3 孙展;秦汉上书制度[D];西北大学;2002年
4 温慧辉;论秦汉妇女的较高地位及其原因[D];河南大学;2002年
5 刘凡镇;秦汉告奸法初探[D];郑州大学;2002年
6 阎盛国;秦汉招降研究[D];河北师范大学;2003年
7 苏卫国;秦汉乡亭制度初探[D];北京大学;2000年
8 唐平;先秦秦汉统一思想形成研究[D];陕西师范大学;2006年
9 邹忠;秦汉农民犯罪研究[D];首都师范大学;2004年
10 梁国强;先秦、秦汉军事乐舞简论[D];河南大学;2004年
本文编号:2198727
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zggdslw/2198727.html