朱子《尚书》学研究
发布时间：2018-08-31 12:24
【摘要】： 朱子《尚书》学在《尚书》学史上具有转关作用，成为了“尽信《书》”向疑辨《尚书》转变的关键，开启了《尚书》研究的新方法与路径。 唐韩愈首倡弃传求经，至宋疑古惑经蔚为大观，这一思潮为朱子疑辨诸经提供了思想资源和学术氛围，是朱子疑《书》成果可以被学界接受的前提。宋代《尚书》研究，二程以来的理学家为《尚书》这部古老经典灌注了理学思想的新鲜血液，理学一派《书》学逐渐成为核心，为朱子以理学思想解《书》提供了思想基础。王安石、苏轼、林之奇、吕祖谦宋四名家《书》解以个例鲜明地呈现了宋学义理解经特色，反映了经学家以经为工具展开的思想斗争，，揭示了疑《书》由点滴而成系统的过程。四家《书》学与朱子《书》学的关系充分反映了宋学独尊到汉宋结合的转变，以及朱子对时贤《书》学的批判与继承。 淳熙十三年(1186年)，朱子开始着手《书集传》工作。朱子与学侣弟子书信来往论《书》者共十八人，《朱子语类》中论《书》者七十二人，讨论《尚书》的活动主要在其晚年，朱子《书》学思想在讨论中逐渐形成。朱子注《书》五篇引书达四十五部，在实践上体现了汉、宋学的融合。朱子注《书》数篇反映了他对《尚书》训诂与义理的创新，为蔡沈《书集传》奠定了基本原则及体例。朱子对《大、小序》、《古文尚书》、《孔安国传》展开了系统疑辨，影响其后研究尤巨。 朱子早年出入佛老，师事李侗后归本伊洛，以《四书》为核心开始建构其理学大厦，晚年其学术重心在《礼》学，《尚书》文本整体始终未进入朱子思想的核心。庆元党禁严重制约了朱子的学术活动，朱子未能完成《书集传》的撰著，这与他生平学术价值取向及晚年遭遇有关。 蔡沈家族与朱子有深厚的学术渊源，蔡沈著《洪范皇极内篇》传蔡元定独得之学，这是朱子托《书集传》予蔡沈的主要原因。蔡沈解《书》思想层面上一本朱子理学精神，但在体例上却与朱子有较大的差异，后者成为援朱反蔡者口实。 朱子解《书》通过对传统命题内涵的改造，蕴含了他解经修身、淑世、护教的价值取向。朱子解《书》重训诂与义理的结合，由此展开的对汉、宋学的批评触及了解释循环性的理论问题。朱子疑《书》改《书》及以理学思想解《书》揭示了朱子对解经历史性具有清醒的认识。
[Abstract]:Zhu Zi's study of Shangshu has the function of changing customs in the history of Shangshu, which has become the key to the transformation from "believing" to "suspecting", and opens a new method and path for the study of "Shangshu". Tang Han Yu first proposed to abandon biography and seek sutras and to the Song Dynasty to doubt the ancient sutras. This trend of thought provided the ideological resources and academic atmosphere for Zhu Zi's sutras. It was the premise that Zhu Zi's dubious book could be accepted by the academic circles. The study of Shangshu in the Song Dynasty shows that the Neo-Confucianism since the second stage infused the fresh blood of Neo-Confucianism thought for the ancient classic of Shangshu. The study of "Book" from one school of Neo-Confucianism gradually became the core, which provided the ideological basis for Zhu Zi's understanding of "Book" with the thought of Neo-Confucianism. Wang Anshi, Su Shi, Lin Zhiqi, Lu Zuqian and Song Dynasty's four famous writers, "Books", with individual examples, clearly present the characteristics of Song Xueyi's understanding of the Sutra, reflect the ideological struggle launched by the scholars with the Sutra as a tool, and reveal the process of the "Book of doubt" becoming a system by bit. The relationship between the four "Book" studies and Zhu Zi's "book" studies fully reflects the transformation of Song school to the combination of Han and Song dynasties, as well as Zhu Zi's criticism and inheritance of Shi Xian's study. Chun-hee 13 years (1186), Zhu began to work on the collection of books. Zhu Zi and his disciple of learning on the exchange of letters "book" altogether 18 people, "Zhu Zi language category" in the "book" 72 people, the discussion "Shang Shu" activities mainly in his later years, Zhu Zi "book" study thought gradually formed in the discussion. Zhu Zi's five citations include 45 books, which embody the fusion of Han and Song learning in practice. Zhu Zi's notes and books reflect his innovation in exegesis and theory, and lay a foundation for Cai Shen's biography of the Book of Books. Zhu Zi made a systematic analysis of "the preface to the Big and the small", the Book of the Ancient writings and the Biography of Confucius and Anguo, which influenced the later studies. In his early years, Zhu Zi entered and went out of the Buddha's old age, and the teacher of Li Dong returned to Benilo and began to construct his Neo-Confucianism building with the "four Books" as the core. In his later years, his academic focus was on "ritual" learning, and the whole text of "Shang Shu" never entered the core of Zhu Zi's thought. The ban of Qingyuan Party seriously restricted Zhu Zi's academic activities, and Zhu Zi failed to complete the compilation of Book Collection, which was related to his academic value orientation in his life and his experiences in his later years. Cai Shen's family has a deep academic origin with Zhu Zi. Cai Shen's biography of Cai Yuanding's study is the main reason why Zhu Zituo's biography of Book works is given to Cai Shen. Cai Shen interprets the book "Book" on the ideological level, but there is a great difference in style between Zhu and Zhu, the latter becoming the aid to Zhu anti-Cai. Zhu Zi's interpretation of the book through the transformation of the connotation of the traditional proposition contains the value orientation of his understanding of the scripture, the cultivation of the world and the protection of education. Zhu Zi's interpretation of "Book" emphasizes the combination of exegesis and righteousness, and the criticism of Han and Song studies has touched on the theoretical problem of explaining circulation. Zhu Zi's doubt about the Book and the interpretation of the Book with the thought of Neo-Confucianism revealed Zhu Zi's sober understanding of the history of the interpretation of the Sutra.
【学位授予单位】：华东师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：K244
本文编号：2214976
[Abstract]:Zhu Zi's study of Shangshu has the function of changing customs in the history of Shangshu, which has become the key to the transformation from "believing" to "suspecting", and opens a new method and path for the study of "Shangshu". Tang Han Yu first proposed to abandon biography and seek sutras and to the Song Dynasty to doubt the ancient sutras. This trend of thought provided the ideological resources and academic atmosphere for Zhu Zi's sutras. It was the premise that Zhu Zi's dubious book could be accepted by the academic circles. The study of Shangshu in the Song Dynasty shows that the Neo-Confucianism since the second stage infused the fresh blood of Neo-Confucianism thought for the ancient classic of Shangshu. The study of "Book" from one school of Neo-Confucianism gradually became the core, which provided the ideological basis for Zhu Zi's understanding of "Book" with the thought of Neo-Confucianism. Wang Anshi, Su Shi, Lin Zhiqi, Lu Zuqian and Song Dynasty's four famous writers, "Books", with individual examples, clearly present the characteristics of Song Xueyi's understanding of the Sutra, reflect the ideological struggle launched by the scholars with the Sutra as a tool, and reveal the process of the "Book of doubt" becoming a system by bit. The relationship between the four "Book" studies and Zhu Zi's "book" studies fully reflects the transformation of Song school to the combination of Han and Song dynasties, as well as Zhu Zi's criticism and inheritance of Shi Xian's study. Chun-hee 13 years (1186), Zhu began to work on the collection of books. Zhu Zi and his disciple of learning on the exchange of letters "book" altogether 18 people, "Zhu Zi language category" in the "book" 72 people, the discussion "Shang Shu" activities mainly in his later years, Zhu Zi "book" study thought gradually formed in the discussion. Zhu Zi's five citations include 45 books, which embody the fusion of Han and Song learning in practice. Zhu Zi's notes and books reflect his innovation in exegesis and theory, and lay a foundation for Cai Shen's biography of the Book of Books. Zhu Zi made a systematic analysis of "the preface to the Big and the small", the Book of the Ancient writings and the Biography of Confucius and Anguo, which influenced the later studies. In his early years, Zhu Zi entered and went out of the Buddha's old age, and the teacher of Li Dong returned to Benilo and began to construct his Neo-Confucianism building with the "four Books" as the core. In his later years, his academic focus was on "ritual" learning, and the whole text of "Shang Shu" never entered the core of Zhu Zi's thought. The ban of Qingyuan Party seriously restricted Zhu Zi's academic activities, and Zhu Zi failed to complete the compilation of Book Collection, which was related to his academic value orientation in his life and his experiences in his later years. Cai Shen's family has a deep academic origin with Zhu Zi. Cai Shen's biography of Cai Yuanding's study is the main reason why Zhu Zituo's biography of Book works is given to Cai Shen. Cai Shen interprets the book "Book" on the ideological level, but there is a great difference in style between Zhu and Zhu, the latter becoming the aid to Zhu anti-Cai. Zhu Zi's interpretation of the book through the transformation of the connotation of the traditional proposition contains the value orientation of his understanding of the scripture, the cultivation of the world and the protection of education. Zhu Zi's interpretation of "Book" emphasizes the combination of exegesis and righteousness, and the criticism of Han and Song studies has touched on the theoretical problem of explaining circulation. Zhu Zi's doubt about the Book and the interpretation of the Book with the thought of Neo-Confucianism revealed Zhu Zi's sober understanding of the history of the interpretation of the Sutra.
【学位授予单位】：华东师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：K244
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 杨桦;《尚书》德政思想及其文学表述[D];东北师范大学;2010年
本文编号：2214976
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zggdslw/2214976.html
