明代江西进士考证
发布时间：2018-12-11 23:51
【摘要】：随着科举制度研究的不断深入，学界对相关文献的利用提出了更高的要求。但是就明代科举制度的研究看，目前大多数学者对明代科举文献重利用、轻整理，忽视了文献记载可能存在的错误，以致得出的结论相互抵牾，不能令人信服。本文对记载明代江西进士的诸多文献，一一予以排比、梳理、考证，揭示其存在的各种类型的讹误，在此基础上，对明代江西进士首次作了全面的统计、审定，并一一写出小传，为全面、深入地研究明代江西进士做了最基础性的工作。 前言部分指出目前明代科举制度研究中存在各种不足，认为轻视对科举文献的整理和研究是产生问题的根源；由此提出本文研究的意义，即为明代科举制度研究提供准确的参考数据，并对本文的研究过程和方法作了简要描述。 绪论第一节分析记载明代江西进士的各类科举文献，主要揭示其各自存在的问题：明代《登科录》中的官年问题，《皇明贡举考》、《类姓登科考》的版本问题，《国朝历科进士题名碑录初集》和《明清进士题名碑录索引》的记载失实问题，地方志选举表的漏收、误收、窜榜等问题，诸如此类。这些即是本文研究所针对的问题。第二节考证了明代全国开科榜数和进士总数，以之为分析江西进士的大背景。第三节考证明代江西进士的时空分布规律，并从经济、政治和文化等多种角度分析其原因。 第一章考证明代江西进士的姓名。明代进士存在较多的变更姓名的现象，一些进士名录没有注意，导致出现误一为二或误二为一的问题；还有些名录在记载进士姓名、字号时出现笔误。本章从复姓、更名及误载等方面进行了考证。 第二章考证明代江西进士的籍贯。籍贯对于明代进士有着的比较重要的意义。一些文献在记载江西进士的籍贯时，或者记载错误，，或者失考原籍，或者误收外省进士等。这是本章考证针对的问题。 第三章考证明代江西进士的榜甲名次。主要考证了地方志和人物传记资料对明代江西进士榜次的误载，及《明清进士题名碑录索引》等名录对江西进士甲次的误载，并分析了其出错的原因。 第四章考证明代江西进士的年龄。首先考证《登科录》资料中记载江西进士年龄的错误，即官年；其次考证其他人物传记资料记载江西进士年龄(生卒年)的错误。 第五章对各书漏载、补阙及滥增的明代江西进士加以考证。漏载、补阙的考证主要针对《明清进士题名碑录索引》，而滥增则主要针对地方志选举表。 正文末附录2种，前1种为正文参考表格5份，后1种为明代江西进士小传，是本文考证的阶段性结果。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of the imperial examination system, academic circles put forward higher requirements for the use of relevant documents. But as far as the study of imperial examination system in Ming Dynasty is concerned, most scholars pay more attention to the use of imperial examination documents in Ming Dynasty and neglect the errors that may exist in the literature records, so that their conclusions contradict each other and are not convincing. This paper compares, combs, studies and reveals the various types of errors in the literature of Jiangxi Jinshi in Ming Dynasty. On this basis, for the first time, the author makes a comprehensive statistic and examination of Jiangxi Jin Shi in Ming Dynasty. And wrote one by one, for a comprehensive, in-depth study of Jiangxi scholars in the Ming Dynasty did the most basic work. The preface points out that there are various deficiencies in the study of imperial examination system in Ming Dynasty, and thinks that contempt for the collation and study of imperial examination documents is the root cause of the problems. The significance of this study is to provide accurate reference data for the study of imperial examination system in Ming Dynasty, and a brief description of the research process and method of this paper is also given. The first section of the introduction analyzes and records all kinds of imperial examination documents of Jiangxi scholars in the Ming Dynasty, mainly revealing their respective problems: the problems of the official year in the Ming Dynasty's "record of Dengke", the "examination of Emperor Ming Gong", and the issue of the edition of "the examination of registration of the family name". The problems of misrepresentation in the records of the inscription of the imperial chronicles and the index of the inscriptions of the Ming and Qing dynasties, the missing collection, the wrong collection and the running list of the local chronicles election tables, and so on, and so on. These are the problems that this paper aims at. The second section makes a textual study of the total number of scholars and the total number of scholars in the Ming Dynasty, taking it as the background of the analysis of Jiangxi jinshi. The third section studies the temporal and spatial distribution of Jiangxi scholars in Ming Dynasty, and analyzes its causes from economic, political and cultural perspectives. The first chapter studies the names of Jiangxi scholars in Ming Dynasty. In the Ming Dynasty, there were more changes in the names of Jin Shi, some of them did not pay attention to the list of scholars, which led to the problem of mistake one for two or two for one; there was also a clerical error in recording the names and sizes of Jin Shi in some of the names of Jin Shi in the Ming Dynasty. This chapter has carried on the textual research from the complex surname, the change of name and the wrong load and so on. The second chapter studies the origin of Jiangxi Jin Shi in Ming Dynasty. The place of origin has more important significance to the Jin Shi in Ming Dynasty. Some documents record the place of origin of Jiangxi Jin Shi, or record mistakes, or lost their original place of origin, or mistakenly admitted the local scholars from other provinces and so on. This is the problem of this chapter. The third chapter makes textual research on the ranking of Jiangxi Jinshi in Ming Dynasty. This paper mainly discusses the misloading of local chronicles and biographical data to the list of Jiangxi scholars in Ming and Qing dynasties, and the false loading of Jiangxi Jin Scholars A by the list of "Ming and Qing Dynasty inscriptions of inscription Steles", and analyzes the reasons for the mistakes. Chapter four studies the age of Jiangxi jinshi in Ming dynasty. Firstly, the errors of the age of the Jiangxi scholars are recorded in the record of "record of Dengke", that is, the official year, and secondly, the errors of the age (birth and death year) of the scholars in Jiangxi are recorded in the biographical data of other figures. In the fifth chapter, the author makes textual research on the missing contents of the books, the supplement and the excessive increase of Jiangxi scholars in Ming Dynasty. Missing load, the textual research of replenishing que is mainly aimed at the index of Ming and Qing Dynasty inscription, while overgrowth is mainly aimed at the local chronicles election table. There are two kinds of appendix at the end of the text, the first one is 5 copies of the reference table and the latter one is a biography of Jiangxi Jin Shi in Ming Dynasty, which is the stage result of the textual research in this paper.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：K248
本文编号：2373463
[Abstract]:With the deepening of the imperial examination system, academic circles put forward higher requirements for the use of relevant documents. But as far as the study of imperial examination system in Ming Dynasty is concerned, most scholars pay more attention to the use of imperial examination documents in Ming Dynasty and neglect the errors that may exist in the literature records, so that their conclusions contradict each other and are not convincing. This paper compares, combs, studies and reveals the various types of errors in the literature of Jiangxi Jinshi in Ming Dynasty. On this basis, for the first time, the author makes a comprehensive statistic and examination of Jiangxi Jin Shi in Ming Dynasty. And wrote one by one, for a comprehensive, in-depth study of Jiangxi scholars in the Ming Dynasty did the most basic work. The preface points out that there are various deficiencies in the study of imperial examination system in Ming Dynasty, and thinks that contempt for the collation and study of imperial examination documents is the root cause of the problems. The significance of this study is to provide accurate reference data for the study of imperial examination system in Ming Dynasty, and a brief description of the research process and method of this paper is also given. The first section of the introduction analyzes and records all kinds of imperial examination documents of Jiangxi scholars in the Ming Dynasty, mainly revealing their respective problems: the problems of the official year in the Ming Dynasty's "record of Dengke", the "examination of Emperor Ming Gong", and the issue of the edition of "the examination of registration of the family name". The problems of misrepresentation in the records of the inscription of the imperial chronicles and the index of the inscriptions of the Ming and Qing dynasties, the missing collection, the wrong collection and the running list of the local chronicles election tables, and so on, and so on. These are the problems that this paper aims at. The second section makes a textual study of the total number of scholars and the total number of scholars in the Ming Dynasty, taking it as the background of the analysis of Jiangxi jinshi. The third section studies the temporal and spatial distribution of Jiangxi scholars in Ming Dynasty, and analyzes its causes from economic, political and cultural perspectives. The first chapter studies the names of Jiangxi scholars in Ming Dynasty. In the Ming Dynasty, there were more changes in the names of Jin Shi, some of them did not pay attention to the list of scholars, which led to the problem of mistake one for two or two for one; there was also a clerical error in recording the names and sizes of Jin Shi in some of the names of Jin Shi in the Ming Dynasty. This chapter has carried on the textual research from the complex surname, the change of name and the wrong load and so on. The second chapter studies the origin of Jiangxi Jin Shi in Ming Dynasty. The place of origin has more important significance to the Jin Shi in Ming Dynasty. Some documents record the place of origin of Jiangxi Jin Shi, or record mistakes, or lost their original place of origin, or mistakenly admitted the local scholars from other provinces and so on. This is the problem of this chapter. The third chapter makes textual research on the ranking of Jiangxi Jinshi in Ming Dynasty. This paper mainly discusses the misloading of local chronicles and biographical data to the list of Jiangxi scholars in Ming and Qing dynasties, and the false loading of Jiangxi Jin Scholars A by the list of "Ming and Qing Dynasty inscriptions of inscription Steles", and analyzes the reasons for the mistakes. Chapter four studies the age of Jiangxi jinshi in Ming dynasty. Firstly, the errors of the age of the Jiangxi scholars are recorded in the record of "record of Dengke", that is, the official year, and secondly, the errors of the age (birth and death year) of the scholars in Jiangxi are recorded in the biographical data of other figures. In the fifth chapter, the author makes textual research on the missing contents of the books, the supplement and the excessive increase of Jiangxi scholars in Ming Dynasty. Missing load, the textual research of replenishing que is mainly aimed at the index of Ming and Qing Dynasty inscription, while overgrowth is mainly aimed at the local chronicles election table. There are two kinds of appendix at the end of the text, the first one is 5 copies of the reference table and the latter one is a biography of Jiangxi Jin Shi in Ming Dynasty, which is the stage result of the textual research in this paper.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：K248
【引证文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 汪超;;明人夏言词与稼轩词比较刍议——以夏辛二人信州词作为中心[J];长江学术;2008年02期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 汪超;;明人夏言词与稼轩词比较刍议——以夏辛二人信州词作为中心[A];纪念辛弃疾逝世800周年学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2007年
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 陈清慧;明代藩府刻书研究[D];南京大学;2011年
2 姜传松;清代江西乡试研究[D];厦门大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 吴恩荣;明代科举士子备考研究[D];东北师范大学;2011年
2 曾繁全;明代江西士大夫群体[D];华东师范大学;2010年
3 陈凌;明清松江府进士人群研究[D];上海社会科学院;2010年
4 张映雪;明代吉安府佛教与士绅[D];南昌大学;2012年
5 孟蝶;明代云南进士群体研究[D];辽宁师范大学;2012年
6 王昌民;明清时期鄱阳湖区交通地理研究（1368-1840）[D];暨南大学;2013年
7 郭文安;从科举到商业[D];华中师范大学;2013年
本文编号：2373463
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zggdslw/2373463.html
