隋唐佛教“宗派问题”再辨——兼对隋唐佛教不存在宗派说的回应
发布时间：2019-06-03 18:51
【摘要】：隋唐以后中国佛教以"宗派"为主要存在形式,这在学界一度作为进一步研究的出发点。但关于中国佛教宗派的形成时间、宗派数量、特征以及各宗的形成问题一直异说纷呈,到20世纪末,甚至有学者质疑隋唐"宗派"的存在。这些讨论对中国佛教的研究有积极的促进意义;但是对"宗派"存在的质疑,不仅是对中国佛教史上隋唐以来佛教存在方式的历史事实的省思,而且是对百年来佛教学术研究的基本理路的挑战。本文在分析"宗派"问题质疑依据和产生原因的基础上,认为对隋唐佛教"宗派"存在及其存在方式的重新厘定,需要就"宗派"描述对中国佛教的适用性作出回应。而"宗派"是否适合描述中国佛教隋唐之后的生存状态,首先在于中国佛教在隋唐之后的发展,是否具有迥异于六朝佛教的态势;其次在于"宗派"能否概括和说明这种总体发展态势。对隋唐佛教"宗派"存在方式的认识,要考虑到佛教宗派形成的过程性。宗派佛教的发展,在隋唐时期还处于一个建设期。顺应着中国佛教自身的发展逻辑,中国佛教宗派的形成是一个冲突和会通并存的过程,以会通化解冲突,成为隋唐佛教宗派发展的基色。
[Abstract]:After Sui and Tang dynasties, Chinese Buddhism took "sectarian" as the main form of existence, which was once the starting point of further study in academic circles. However, the formation time, number, characteristics and formation of Buddhist sects in China have been controversial. At the end of the 20th century, some scholars even questioned the existence of "sects" in Sui and Tang dynasties. These discussions are of positive significance to the study of Chinese Buddhism. However, the questioning of the existence of "sectarian" is not only a reflection on the historical facts of the way of Buddhist existence since Sui and Tang dynasties in the history of Chinese Buddhism, but also a challenge to the basic logic of Buddhist academic research in the past hundred years. Based on the analysis of the questioning basis and causes of the problem of "sectarian", this paper holds that it is necessary to respond to the applicability of the description of "sectarian" to Chinese Buddhism in order to redefine the existence and mode of existence of "sectarian" in Sui and Tang dynasties. Whether the "sectarian" is suitable to describe the living state of Chinese Buddhism after the Sui and Tang dynasties lies in the development of Chinese Buddhism after the Sui and Tang dynasties and whether it has a very different situation from that of the six dynasties Buddhism. Secondly, whether the sectarian can generalize and explain this overall development trend. In order to understand the existence mode of Buddhist sectarian in Sui and Tang dynasties, we should take into account the process of Buddhist sectarian formation. The development of sectarian Buddhism was still in a period of construction in the Sui and Tang dynasties. In accordance with the development logic of Chinese Buddhism itself, the formation of Chinese Buddhist sectarian is a process of conflict and communication, in order to resolve the conflict and become the basic color of the development of Buddhist sectarian in Sui and Tang dynasties.
【作者单位】： 中国政法大学人文学院哲学系;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目“中唐佛教宗派冲突和会通的思想史意义”阶段性成果(06CZX015) 2011新世纪优秀人才计划“唐代儒佛关系研究”前期成果
【分类号】：B948;K241
本文编号：2492139
[Abstract]:After Sui and Tang dynasties, Chinese Buddhism took "sectarian" as the main form of existence, which was once the starting point of further study in academic circles. However, the formation time, number, characteristics and formation of Buddhist sects in China have been controversial. At the end of the 20th century, some scholars even questioned the existence of "sects" in Sui and Tang dynasties. These discussions are of positive significance to the study of Chinese Buddhism. However, the questioning of the existence of "sectarian" is not only a reflection on the historical facts of the way of Buddhist existence since Sui and Tang dynasties in the history of Chinese Buddhism, but also a challenge to the basic logic of Buddhist academic research in the past hundred years. Based on the analysis of the questioning basis and causes of the problem of "sectarian", this paper holds that it is necessary to respond to the applicability of the description of "sectarian" to Chinese Buddhism in order to redefine the existence and mode of existence of "sectarian" in Sui and Tang dynasties. Whether the "sectarian" is suitable to describe the living state of Chinese Buddhism after the Sui and Tang dynasties lies in the development of Chinese Buddhism after the Sui and Tang dynasties and whether it has a very different situation from that of the six dynasties Buddhism. Secondly, whether the sectarian can generalize and explain this overall development trend. In order to understand the existence mode of Buddhist sectarian in Sui and Tang dynasties, we should take into account the process of Buddhist sectarian formation. The development of sectarian Buddhism was still in a period of construction in the Sui and Tang dynasties. In accordance with the development logic of Chinese Buddhism itself, the formation of Chinese Buddhist sectarian is a process of conflict and communication, in order to resolve the conflict and become the basic color of the development of Buddhist sectarian in Sui and Tang dynasties.
【作者单位】： 中国政法大学人文学院哲学系;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目“中唐佛教宗派冲突和会通的思想史意义”阶段性成果(06CZX015) 2011新世纪优秀人才计划“唐代儒佛关系研究”前期成果
【分类号】：B948;K241
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 石峻,方立天;论隋唐佛教宗派的形成[J];哲学研究;1981年08期
2 子君;隋唐时期形成的佛教宗派[J];华夏文化;1996年04期
3 祁生彦;;青海的佛教宗派[J];群文天地;2011年09期
4 no用彤;中国佛教宗派UO楲补娭[J];北京大学学报(人文科学);1963年05期
5 谢重光;20世纪国内对隋唐五代佛教宗派及其思想学说研究之回顾[J];汕头大学学报;1999年04期
6 陈引驰;;柳宗元佛教宗派取向及背景分析[J];中国文学研究(辑刊);2008年01期
7 陈士强;佛教宗派史上的谱系[J];复旦学报(社会科学版);1991年01期
8 广兴;;斯里兰卡的佛教宗派[J];法音;1992年10期
9 龙云清;;梵净山佛教宗派探析[J];铜仁师范高等专科学校学报(综合版);2006年04期
10 杨筝;;兴盛时期河洛佛教宗派述说[J];洛阳理工学院学报(社会科学版);2009年02期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 黄耀X;;禅宗与对句[A];传统中国研究集刊（第七辑）[C];2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 郑凌予;中国佛教宗派对韩国佛教寺庙空间演变的影响[D];西南大学;2012年
2 袁宏琳;关于镰仓期法皇的思想性考察[D];中山大学;2010年
，本文编号：2492139
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zggdslw/2492139.html
