小历史与大历史的对话:王笛《茶馆》之方法论

发布时间：2018-01-05 22:27

本文关键词：小历史与大历史的对话:王笛《茶馆》之方法论　出处：《近代史研究》2015年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在中国近代城市史、日常生活史研究领域,王笛的《茶馆》~①是一部极具影响的著作。其方法论价值,尤其值得关注。在问题意识上,该著既从茶馆史研究本身进行突破,更追求宏大的理论意义,关注国家文化和地方文化的冲突。在理论与方法上,打破传统史学路径,凸显了微观史和新文化史的叙事风格和民众与公共生活之间的关系。在结构上,既考察了茶馆历史本身的纵向变化,也注重茶馆与国外类似公共空间的比较,特别是二者的近似性。在解释上,认为政府权力与地方社会之间是控制与反控制的关系,并深入分析了茶馆长期延续的原因。当然,无论在理论、概念还是叙述方式、问题阐释上,该著仍有进一步提升的空间。
[Abstract]:In Chinese modern city history research field, the history of everyday life, "Wang Di is a very >~ teahouse effect works. The value of its methodology, especially worthy of attention. In the sense, the only from the study of the history of tea break, but also the pursuit of great theoretical significance, close the note of national culture and conflict the local culture. In theory and method, to break the traditional route of history, highlighting the relationship between micro history and new cultural history narrative style and the public and public life. In the structure, not only investigated the longitudinal changes of tea history itself, but also pay attention to the Tea Museum compared with foreign similar public space, especially the approximate two. In explanation, that between the government power and the local society is the relationship between the control and anti control, and analyzes the reason for the continuity of the teahouse. Of course, no matter in theory, or the concept of narrative, interpretation problems, There is still room for further promotion.

【作者单位】：南开大学历史学院、中国社会史研究中心;
【基金】：教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目“民国日常生活”(13JJD770017)的阶段成果
【分类号】：C912.81;K25
【正文快照】： 史学史证明,历史研究的突破主要取决于两点,一是新资料和新对象的发现,一是理论方法的革新,二者相辅相成,不可偏废。相比之下,我以为更重要的是后者,它带给历史研究往往具有革命性的意义。即便是新资料、新对象的发现,除了偶然因素之外,也常与新的理论方法的启发有关,否则,再

【参考文献】