法律精英、法律移植和本土化:以民国初期的修订法律馆为例

发布时间：2018-02-01 13:29

本文关键词： 修订法律馆法律精英法律移植本土化中国法律近代化　出处：《法学家》2014年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：《职员录》等文献资料的研究表明,法律移植是民国初期修订法律馆修律的主要手段。民初修订法律馆沿袭清末的做法,以移植大陆法系德、日两国的法律为主,兼及大陆法系的法国、奥地利和英美法系的英国等国的法律。修订法律馆汇集了一批当时的法律精英,这也是实现法律移植的必不可少的条件。它在移植外国法的同时,对清末法律修订中过分仿效德日法律的不足有所反省和矫正,而对本土化有所重视。这一点在《第二次民律草案》中的物权、亲属、继承三编中体现得较为明显。由于政治、社会等条件的限制,在民国初期,除个别法律草案得以颁布实施外,大部分法律草案都束之高阁了。从这一角度讲,民初修订法律馆所做的法律移植是一项未竟的事业,其命运和其前身清末修订法律馆相似。
[Abstract]:The research on documents such as official Records shows that law transplantation is the main means of revising the law institute in the early period of the Republic of China. In order to transplant the morality of the civil law system, the revision of the law institute in the early Republic of China followed the practice of the late Qing Dynasty. The laws of Japan and Japan are the main ones, including the laws of France, Austria and Britain of the continental law system. The revision of the Law Museum brings together a group of legal elites of that time. This is also an indispensable condition for the realization of law transplantation. While transplanting foreign laws, it reflects on and corrects the shortcomings of excessively imitating the laws of Germany and Japan in the revision of laws in the late Qing Dynasty. In the second draft of the people's Law, the property rights, relatives, inheritance of the three parts are more obvious. Because of the political, social and other conditions, in the early period of the Republic of China. In addition to the individual draft laws can be promulgated and implemented, most of the draft laws are shelved. From this point of view, the legal transplant done by the revised Law Museum in the early Republic of China is an unfinished business. Its fate is similar to that of its predecessor, the revised Law Museum in the late Qing Dynasty.
【作者单位】：汕头大学法学院;
【分类号】：D929;K26
【正文快照】： 清末民初是中国社会转型的关键时期,见证了二千余年的帝国专制统治的最终结束,及以宪政为诉求的民国政府登场。这一时期也是立法模式从传统向现代过渡的转折期。清末宪政的难产和民初的派系斗争,导致近代意义上立法机构的建立面临诸多障碍,以至其立法功能的发挥受到很大的限制

【参考文献】