中国农村经济研究会研究

发布时间：2018-02-09 00:14

本文关键词： 农村经济研究会中国农村乡村改良主义卜凯中国农村社会性质　出处：《山东师范大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：1933年,陈翰笙组织一批进步青年从事广泛的农村调查并发表论述,这些产生了很大影响,引起了国民党当局的忌恨与打击,进步青年被“开除”出中央研究院社会科学研究所,陈翰笙在社会科学研究所也已难以立足,被迫辞职。为了进一步团结和整合学术队伍,推动和加强农村经济研究,经过陈翰笙和其他同志共同努力,于1933年12月组织成立了民间学术团体——中国农村经济研究会。陈翰笙被选为这个研究会理事会的主席。该研究会吸收社会名人吴觉农(中华农学会会长)、孙晓村(行政院农村复兴委员会专员)、冯和法(著名的农业经济学家)等。1934年8月,中国农村经济研究会组织扩大,在上海举行扩大会议。会内建立了中共的秘密领导小组。该研究会后来成员发展到1000人之多。研究会根据党的政策方针开展研究和宣传工作。中国农村经济研究会存在期,一共选举产生了五届理事,陈翰笙始终是理事长。至此,这批胸怀革命理想的青年学人在国民党统治区赢得了研究农村经济的合法阵地,他们在中国农村社会性质大论战。本论文主要分三部分对中国农村经济研究会进行论证和总结概括。首先,介绍了中国农村经济研究会成立的原因与背景,成立后所创办的刊物及成立后所做的学术事业和活动。这其中包括了中国农村经济研究会成立的内外及国际原因,有力的论证了中国农村经济研究会存在的合理性。《中国农村》这个刊物的特点和性质等。另一方面就是对于中国农村经济研究会所做的学术事业的认同与农研会所做的活动。通过对以第一章的论证可以形成对于中国农村经济研究会这个组织一种比较全面的概括和总结。其次,中国农村经济研究会与各个组织的论战,主要有三次这种论战。第一次是关于赢得了关于中国农村社会性质问题论战。第二次是对梁漱溟、晏阳初为代表的乡村改良主义运动的批判。第三次是对美国资产阶级学者卜凯错误论点的批评。第三部分主要是关于中国农村经济研究会及其活动所产生的影响,这些影响既包括对于党的政策制定的影响与推动,也包括了对于中国农村经济研究会以外各个经济组织的产生的影响。通过中国农村经济研究会成员的调查与研究,有力的证实了当时的中国是一个半殖民地半封建的社会性质,宣传了党的政策与方针,驳斥了各个学派的观点。也为党在农村经济政策的制定提供了理论上的支持和论证。
[Abstract]:In 1933, Chen Hansheng organized a group of progressive young people to carry out extensive rural investigations and published an exposition, which had a great impact on the Kuomintang authorities' hatred and crackdown, and the progressive youth were "expelled" from the Institute of Social Sciences of the Academia Sinica. Chen Hansheng has also been unable to gain a foothold in the Institute of Social Sciences and has been forced to resign. In order to further unite and integrate the academic team and promote and strengthen the study of rural economy, through the joint efforts of Chen Hansheng and other comrades, In December 1933, organized the establishment of a non-governmental academic group-China Rural Economic Research Association. Chen Hansheng was elected chairman of the council of the research institute. The research will draw on the famous social celebrities Wu Juenong (chairman of the Chinese agricultural association), Sun Xiaocun (commissioner of the rural rejuvenation committee of the executive yuan), Sun Xiaocun (famous agricultural economics). August 1934, The organization of the China Rural Economic Research Association has been expanded, An enlarged conference was held in Shanghai, during which a secret leading group of the Communist Party of China was set up. The research group later grew to as many as 1,000 members. The research committee carried out research and propaganda work in accordance with the Party's policy and guidelines. The China Rural Economic Research Association was in existence. A total of five governors were elected, and Chen Hansheng was always the chairman. So far, these young scholars with revolutionary ideals have won a legitimate position in studying rural economy in the Kuomintang ruling areas. This paper is divided into three parts to demonstrate and summarize the China Rural Economic Research Association. First of all, it introduces the reasons and background of the establishment of the China Rural Economic Research Association, the publications established after its establishment, and its academic undertakings and activities after its establishment, which includes the internal and external and international reasons for the establishment of the China Rural Economic Research Association. The paper proves the rationality of the existence of China Rural Economic Research Association. The characteristics and Nature of the publication. On the other hand, the recognition of the academic cause done by the China Rural Economic Research Association and the Agricultural Research Association. Through the argumentation in the first chapter, we can form a more comprehensive summary and summary for the organization of China Rural Economic Research Association. Secondly, there are mainly three such debates between the China Rural Economic Research Association and various organizations. The first one is about winning a debate on the nature of China's rural society. The second is about Liang Shuming. A critique of the rural reformist movement represented by Yen Yang Chu. The third is the criticism of the wrong arguments of the American bourgeois scholar Bok Kai. The third part mainly deals with the impact of the China Rural Economic Research Association and its activities, including the impact and promotion of the policy formulation of the Party. It also includes the impact on various economic organizations outside the China Rural Economic Research Association. Through the investigation and research conducted by members of the China Rural Economic Research Association, it was able to confirm that China was a semi-colonial and semi-feudal society at that time and propagandized the policies and principles of the Party. It refutes the viewpoints of various schools and provides theoretical support and argumentation for the formulation of the Party's rural economic policy.
【学位授予单位】：山东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：F329;K263

【参考文献】