龙泉司法档案所见晚清屡票不案现象研究

发布时间：2018-03-09 03:04

本文选题：晚清　切入点：龙泉司法档案　出处：《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2014年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：龙泉司法档案晚清部分的一些案例显示了一种可以称为"屡票不案"的现象:县官认为诉讼内容存在虚饰或者有悖情理,本不愿准理,但在原告的反复催呈下勉强受理,并签票传讯;然而由于县官在呈状的批词中明显表达了消极态度,传讯差役很容易将其视为非紧急的和有利可图的,从而在传讯过程中更加肆无忌惮地放纵延宕或舞弊勒索。屡票不案现象是由诉讼双方的力量共同促成的:诉讼的一方有足够的财力或相关社会关系反复催呈以维持不断传讯的局面,此谓"屡票";而另一方则有足够的财力或社会关系贿赂差役拒绝到庭,此谓"不案"。通常情况下,这个过程会一直延续下去,直到一方无力支持为止,而这就在实际上宣告了一方的败北和诉讼的终结。"屡票不案"现象可以视为清代诉讼和司法审判的一种模式。
[Abstract]:Some cases in the late Qing part of the Longquan judicial file show a phenomenon that can be called "repeated vote not case": County officials believe that the content of the lawsuit is false or contrary to reason, and is unwilling to be reasonable, but reluctantly accepts it under repeated reminders from the plaintiff. And to sign a ticket for arraignment; however, since the county magistrate clearly expressed a negative attitude in his written approval, it was easy for the arraignment officers to regard it as non-urgent and profitable, Thus, in the process of arraignment, more wanton indulgence of delay or fraud and extortion. The phenomenon of repeated votes is caused by the power of both parties to the lawsuit: the litigant party has sufficient financial resources or related social relations to repeatedly press for maintenance. In a situation of constant arraignment, This is called "repeated votes", and the other party has sufficient financial or social relations to bribe the officer to refuse to appear in court, which is called "no case". Normally, the process will continue until one party is unable to support it. This actually declared the defeat of one party and the end of litigation, which can be regarded as a mode of litigation and judicial trial in Qing Dynasty.
【作者单位】：浙江大学历史学系;
【基金】：2013年度国家社会科学基金重大项目(13&ZD151) 2011年度浙江省哲学社会科学规划“之江青年课题”(11ZJQN046YB)
【分类号】：K252;D929

【参考文献】