再论清末《大清宪法案》稿本问题

发布时间：2018-03-27 07:19

  本文选题：北鬼三郎　切入点：大清宪法案　出处：《历史档案》2017年02期

【摘要】：日本人北鬼三郎撰写的《大清宪法案》是清廷秘密起草钦定宪法草案的参考书目之一,俞江、尚小明和彭剑等学者围绕此书展开数次争论。中国第一历史档案馆保存有“大清宪法案”全文译本和节译的1—4、8、10—11条法理说明档案,仔细研析,可以确定其进呈始于宣统二年(1910年),亦可窥见翻译者、度支部员外郎李景铭的制宪倾向。笔者复在日本阅及《大清宪法案》,将其与未定稿抄本《大清宪法案理由书》比较,发现二者存在较大差异。细读两书例言,可以澄清上述学者争论的“稿本”与“抄本”以及北鬼三郎是否为“著名宪法学家”等问题。
[Abstract]:The "Qing Dynasty Constitution case" written by the Japanese Kitaku Siro is one of the bibliography of the Qing government's secret drafting of the imperial draft constitution, Yu Jiang. Scholars such as Shang Xiaoming and Peng Jian have engaged in several controversies over this book. The first Chinese Historical Archives has a full version of the Constitution of the Qing Dynasty and a 1-4 / 8 / 10-11 legalistic explanation file, which are translated from 1 to 4, and carefully analyzed. It can be ascertained that its introduction began in the second year of Xuantong (1910), and that one can also see the constitutional tendency of Li Jingming, a member of the translator's branch. The author read the Constitution case of the Qing Dynasty in Japan and compared it with the unfinalized copy of the reasons for the Constitution of the Qing Dynasty. It is found that there is a great difference between the two books. Careful reading of the two books can clarify the issues of "manuscripts" and "manuscripts" debated by the above scholars and whether or not Bei Guisanlang is a "famous constitutionalist".
，

本文编号：1670569