国民政府时期大学区制在浙江的试行
发布时间:2018-03-27 18:07
本文选题:国民政府 切入点:浙江 出处:《浙江大学》2011年硕士论文
【摘要】:北伐胜利,国民政府建都南京,政治重心的南移要求学术文化重心的重建,一系列中山大学应运而生。随着教育独立思潮的高涨,一场以法国大学区制为蓝本的、旨在倡导“教育学术化”、“学术研究化”的改革开始在江苏、浙江、北平试行。但是,作为“舶来品”的西方教育制度进入中土后面临场域困境,试行两年即行废止,实乃“昙花一现”,但这一改革在中国近代教育改革中的意义是不能低估的。 本文以浙江大学区为个案,全面梳理大学区制在浙江的试行的史事,分析了大学区制的理念内涵及制度特色在浙江实践及对浙江教育的影响,并将浙江大学区与江苏、北京等试行区做了比较。笔者认为,浙江大学区之所以试行较为顺利,既有传统因素,又与政治变动下高校与政府的良性互动,浙江大学区内知识精英群体努力,以及校长治校理念,在政界、学界的人脉网络因素有关。它彰显了国民政府初建时期政治与教育微妙而复杂的关系,也从另外一个角度昭示了大学区制在中国的不可行性。但是,浙江却借此制赢得了教育的发展空间,其在教育领域所做的努力给近代教育改革留下深刻的启示。
[Abstract]:The victory of the Northern Expedition, the establishment of Nanjing by the National Government, the southward shift of the political center of gravity required the reconstruction of the center of academic and cultural gravity, and a series of Sun Yat-sen universities emerged as the times require. The reform aimed at advocating "educational academization" and "academic research" began to be tried out in Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Peiping. However, the western education system, as an "imported product", faced with difficulties in the field after entering China, and was abolished after two years of trial. In fact, it is a flash in the pan, but the significance of this reform in modern education reform in China can not be underestimated. Taking Zhejiang University District as an example, this paper comprehensively combs the history of the trial of the university district system in Zhejiang, analyzes the concept connotation and system characteristics of the university district system in Zhejiang Province and its influence on Zhejiang education, and combines the Zhejiang University area with Jiangsu Province. The author thinks that the trial of Zhejiang University District is not only due to the traditional factors, but also to the positive interaction between the university and the government under the political changes, and the efforts of the intellectual elite group in Zhejiang University area. And the idea of the principal governing the school, which is related to the network of people in the political circles and academic circles. It shows the subtle and complex relationship between politics and education during the initial period of the National Government. It also shows the infeasibility of the university district system in China from another angle. However, Zhejiang has gained the development space of education by this system, and its efforts in the field of education have left profound enlightenment to the modern education reform.
【学位授予单位】:浙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:G649.29;K265.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赵颖霞;石丽娟;;李石曾近现代大学区制教育思想与实践评析[J];保定学院学报;2009年03期
2 王昊;;民国时期的北平大学区风潮[J];百年潮;2002年02期
3 吕思为,王t;民国大学院、大学区制对我国高等教育区域化的启示[J];高教论坛;2004年02期
4 熊贤君;大学院和大学区制的兴衰[J];高师函授学刊;1994年03期
5 杨卫明;黄仁贤;;中国教育管理体制改革的非凡尝试——民国时期的“大学院”与“大学区”制[J];国家教育行政学院学报;2006年10期
6 方勇;罗彩云;;教育独立的困境——国民政府第一次全国教育会议之考察[J];华东师范大学学报(教育科学版);2007年03期
7 刘海峰;在教育与历史之间——高等教育史研究四探[J];高等教育研究;2001年02期
8 张晓唯;民国时期的“教育独立”思潮评析[J];高等教育研究;2001年05期
9 童富勇;论国民政府初期的高等教育改革[J];杭州大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1998年03期
10 张太原;20世纪30年代的文实之争[J];近代史研究;2005年06期
,本文编号:1672641
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgjxds/1672641.html