政策过程与行为主体:20世纪60年代初高校毕业干部清理收回工作研究

发布时间：2018-07-05 20:40

本文选题：世纪年代初 + 高校毕业干部清理收回工作　；参考：《安徽史学》2017年03期

【摘要】：1961年城镇人口精简工作开展以后,一些地方对部分高等学校毕业干部作了退职处理。不久,中央要求对他们予以调查、清理和收回。由于初始阶段一些政策执行主体行动较慢,上级调整了激励机制,清理收回工作的执行力度、速度有所提升,高校毕业干部清理收回工作取得了一定成绩。但因部分政策对象对清理收回工作的不配合,以及工作后期政策制定主体、执行主体等因素的作用,政策原初目标与最终成效并非完全吻合。从政策过程角度视之,政策成效虽受制于政策制定主体的相对自主性,但政策执行主体的政治、情感、利益等倾向性因素也会在相当大程度上影响政策执行,并促推政策制定的再回应。与此同时,政策对象并非完全的被动接收方,他们既给予政策执行主体以反馈,也波及政策成效。
[Abstract]:After the work of reducing the population of cities and towns was carried out in 1961, some local graduates of institutions of higher learning stepped down from their posts. Soon after, the central government demanded that they be investigated, cleaned up and recovered. Due to the slow action of some policy execution subjects in the initial stage, the higher authorities adjusted the incentive mechanism, cleaned up the implementation of the recovery work, and the speed has been improved, and some achievements have been made in the work of cleaning up and recovering the graduates of colleges and universities. However, due to the lack of cooperation of some policy objects to the clean-up and recovery work, and the role of the main body of policy making and execution in the later stage of the work, the original goal of the policy is not completely consistent with the final effect. From the perspective of policy process, although the effectiveness of policy is limited by the relative autonomy of the policy makers, the political, emotional and interest factors of the policy enforcement subject will also affect the policy implementation to a large extent. And push the policy-making response. At the same time, the policy object is not completely passive receiver, they not only give feedback to the policy executive, but also affect the policy effect.
【作者单位】：南开大学历史学院;
【分类号】：K27

【相似文献】