1895年成都教案的谣言问题
发布时间：2018-08-23 08:44
【摘要】：成都教案是指1895年在成都及其周围地区发生的群众反洋教的事件。1895年5月28日是中国农历传统意义上的端午节,因其是进入五月以后第一个午日登高顺阳的好日子,故端午节又称作端阳节。端阳节当天,为了庆祝节日,成都人民依照旧俗抛李作戏,一时间男女聚观,好生热闹。此时有洋人混入观看,但成都百姓因受谣言影响对洋人多有成见,言语不合,争端遂起,一时间愤怒的成都百姓打毁抢烧了成都地面各国教堂,由此引发震惊中外的成都教案。谣言,是指在事实不完整或是不充分的提前下,捏造出来并广为传播的不真实的言论。作为一种特殊的语言现象,谣言往往是一种集体无意识的自然流露与宣泄。第二次鸦片战争后,外国传教士凭借条约的保护进入川省,由于东西方文化的差异以及教士及其教民多行不法,民教冲突不断。百姓对洋人多存疑虑,且矛盾重重,一时间谣言四起。在成都教案中,谣言作为一根主线与教案发展相始终。教案发生后中外双方从各自的利益角度出发,对谣言的反应态度不一,由此展开了种种博弈。最终,中外双方达成了共识,谣言问题得到处理,同时也代表了成都教案的结束。本文共分四个部分。第一部分介绍甲午战争前洋教在四川的传入与发展,主要包括洋教在四川的早期传入、鸦片战争以后在四川的发展以及由于洋教的迅猛发展而导致的民教冲突。第二部分介绍1895年成都教案前的谣言分析,大体包括谣言传播的内容、形式以及成都教案前谣言的肆行。第三部分介绍成都教案中有关谣言问题的中外交涉与处理,大致包括中外交涉中的谣言问题及其对谣言问题的处理,谣言问题得到了处理也宣告了教案的结束。第四部分结语。
[Abstract]:The Chengdu case refers to the mass anti-foreign religious incident that took place in and around Chengdu in 1895. May 28, 1895, is the Dragon Boat Festival in the traditional sense of the Chinese lunar calendar, because it is the first good day since May to reach Gao Shun Yang. Therefore, Dragon Boat Festival is also known as Duanyang Festival. Duanyang Day, in order to celebrate the festival, Chengdu people in accordance with the old custom cast Li as a play, a time of men and women gathered to live lively. At this time, foreigners mingled in to watch, but Chengdu people because of the influence of rumors to foreigners more prejudice, words, disputes, a time angry Chengdu people destroyed and robbed the churches on the ground in Chengdu, thus triggering a shocking Chinese and foreign Chengdu religious case. A rumor is an untrue statement that is fabricated and widely disseminated in advance of incomplete or inadequate facts. As a special language phenomenon, rumor is often a kind of collective unconscious natural disclosure and catharsis. After the second Opium War, foreign missionaries entered Sichuan Province by virtue of the protection of treaties. People have more doubts about foreigners, and contradictions, a time rumors began. In Chengdu teaching case, rumor as a main line and teaching plan development has always been. After the teaching plan happened, the Chinese and foreign sides reacted differently to the rumor from the angle of their own interests. In the end, the Chinese and foreign sides reached a consensus, the rumor problem was dealt with, but also represents the end of the Chengdu teaching case. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part introduces the introduction and development of the foreign religion in Sichuan before the Sino-Japanese War, including the early introduction of the foreign religion in Sichuan, the development of the foreign religion in Sichuan after the Opium War and the conflicts between the people and the religion caused by the rapid development of the foreign religion. The second part introduces the rumor analysis before the teaching case in Chengdu in 1895, including the content and form of the rumor dissemination and the unscrupulous behavior of the rumor before the teaching case in Chengdu. The third part introduces the Chinese and foreign negotiation and handling of rumors in Chengdu teaching case, including the rumor problem and its treatment in the Chinese and foreign negotiations, which has been dealt with and declared the end of the teaching plan. The fourth part is conclusion.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：K256.8
本文编号：2198521
[Abstract]:The Chengdu case refers to the mass anti-foreign religious incident that took place in and around Chengdu in 1895. May 28, 1895, is the Dragon Boat Festival in the traditional sense of the Chinese lunar calendar, because it is the first good day since May to reach Gao Shun Yang. Therefore, Dragon Boat Festival is also known as Duanyang Festival. Duanyang Day, in order to celebrate the festival, Chengdu people in accordance with the old custom cast Li as a play, a time of men and women gathered to live lively. At this time, foreigners mingled in to watch, but Chengdu people because of the influence of rumors to foreigners more prejudice, words, disputes, a time angry Chengdu people destroyed and robbed the churches on the ground in Chengdu, thus triggering a shocking Chinese and foreign Chengdu religious case. A rumor is an untrue statement that is fabricated and widely disseminated in advance of incomplete or inadequate facts. As a special language phenomenon, rumor is often a kind of collective unconscious natural disclosure and catharsis. After the second Opium War, foreign missionaries entered Sichuan Province by virtue of the protection of treaties. People have more doubts about foreigners, and contradictions, a time rumors began. In Chengdu teaching case, rumor as a main line and teaching plan development has always been. After the teaching plan happened, the Chinese and foreign sides reacted differently to the rumor from the angle of their own interests. In the end, the Chinese and foreign sides reached a consensus, the rumor problem was dealt with, but also represents the end of the Chengdu teaching case. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part introduces the introduction and development of the foreign religion in Sichuan before the Sino-Japanese War, including the early introduction of the foreign religion in Sichuan, the development of the foreign religion in Sichuan after the Opium War and the conflicts between the people and the religion caused by the rapid development of the foreign religion. The second part introduces the rumor analysis before the teaching case in Chengdu in 1895, including the content and form of the rumor dissemination and the unscrupulous behavior of the rumor before the teaching case in Chengdu. The third part introduces the Chinese and foreign negotiation and handling of rumors in Chengdu teaching case, including the rumor problem and its treatment in the Chinese and foreign negotiations, which has been dealt with and declared the end of the teaching plan. The fourth part is conclusion.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：K256.8
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 胡晓;;清末法国传教士在四川教案中的处境及与地方官员的关系——从成都教案到义和团运动[J];宗教学研究;2015年01期
2 杨鹏程;王洪铭;;瘟疫、谣言与社会恐慌——以湖南为例的研究[J];云梦学刊;2014年06期
3 吴佩林;李升涛;;近三十年来关于明清告示的整理与研究[J];西华师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2014年03期
4 陶超;;谣言与成都教案[J];中小企业管理与科技(中旬刊);2014年04期
5 李重华;;川东教案的运行态势研究[J];重庆大学学报(社会科学版);2012年06期
6 李安定;;“反洋教运动”揭帖传播范式的历时性研究[J];西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2012年05期
7 赵鉴军;;从书文揭帖看清末反洋教[J];湖北函授大学学报;2011年03期
8 黄亦君;李晓兰;;清末教案频繁发生原因探析[J];贵州文史丛刊;2008年01期
9 邓常春;;督促与应对:晚清教务教案中中央政府与地方官的互动[J];西南民族大学学报(人文社科版);2005年12期
10 董丛林;“迷拐”、“折割”传闻与天津教案[J];近代史研究;2003年02期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 邓常春;晚清四川教务教案视野中的官绅民教及其互动（1860-1911）[D];四川大学;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 梅爽;鼠疫与谣言[D];东北师范大学;2008年
，本文编号：2198521
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2198521.html
