略论中华古史研究中的学术创新问题

发布时间：2018-05-09 18:37

本文选题：中华古史 + 马克思主义理论　；参考：《河北学刊》2013年02期

【摘要】：研究历史,史识是第一位的,能够发表出人意表、发人深思、令人回味的史论是很不容易的。史识在本质上是科学性的问题,是在不懈地追求真理,同时又不能不与追求民主的态度息息相关。在某种意义上说,史识是对历史和现实的综合洞察力。吸取马克思主义基本理论中的营养有利于学术创新。当然,强调运用马克思主义基本理论治史,绝不应当有排他性,而应当兼容并包,关键之处在于择善而从之,而能否择善而从,这就要看个人的史识了。马克思主义可以教会人们分辨主流与支流、本质与现象、共性与个性,何者是关键,何者不是关键,是两点论,而非一点论。如此之类,对处理和判断纷繁复杂的历史现象,是十分重要的。只有个人的史识站到应有的时代高度,才可能有真正意义的学术创新。
[Abstract]:To study history, history is the first, to be able to publish unexpected, thought-provoking, reminiscent historical theory is very difficult. History knowledge is a scientific problem in essence, it is pursuing truth unremittingly, at the same time, it is closely related to the attitude of pursuing democracy. In a sense, knowledge of history is a comprehensive insight into history and reality. Absorbing the nutrition in the basic theory of Marxism is beneficial to academic innovation. Of course, the emphasis on the use of Marxist basic theory in the administration of history should not be exclusive, but should be inclusive, the key is to choose the good and follow, and whether to choose the good and follow, this depends on the history of the individual. Marxism can teach people to distinguish between mainstream and tributary, essence and phenomenon, generality and individuality, which is the key, which is not the key, but not one point. Such and so on, to deal with and judge the complicated historical phenomenon, is very important. Only when one's historical knowledge stands at the level of the times, can there be real academic innovation.
【作者单位】：首都师范大学历史学院;
【分类号】：K207

【相似文献】