当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 中国通史论文 >

魏晋儒将研究

发布时间:2018-08-24 08:47
【摘要】:魏晋是一个战事频仍的年代,武人本应拥有较高的地位。但历史事实却是这一时期的武人往往被轻视,社会地位不高。文士则社会地位相对较高,享有更多为官的资格与机会,文士领兵甚至成为一种具有时代性的历史现象。本文所要研究的魏晋儒将即指文士领兵这一群体。本文采取个案研究与群体研究相结合的方法,从分裂与统一的角度对魏晋儒将进行研究。魏晋时段的限定也由这一角度决定,上起初平元年(190年)汉末分裂,下至太康元年(280年)西晋统一。第一章是陆逊抗蜀,主要研究孙权选任陆逊为上游统帅的原因,以及夷陵之战与孙吴立国的关系。第二章为司马懿主魏政,侧重研究司马懿夺取曹魏军政大权的条件,高平陵事变与魏晋易代的关系。第三章是羊祜镇襄阳,着重研究晋武帝派遣羊祜镇守襄阳的缘由,羊祜的前期准备与西晋统一的关系。第四章则是魏晋儒将的群体性,“大一统”的政治理想,籍贯分布的相对集中,出身士族都是这一群体所具有的共同特性。前三章分别选择陆逊、司马懿和羊祜作为魏晋儒将的代表,看似独立实则相互联系,三人皆为推进魏晋时期由分裂走向统一的关键人物。孙吴没有陆逊在夷陵之战中的胜利就无法立国,司马氏没有司马懿主掌曹魏军政就无法实现魏晋易代,而西晋没有羊祜在襄阳的长期经营更是无法统一全国。从汉末的群雄割据到三国鼎立,再到西晋灭吴,以陆逊、司马懿和羊祜为代表的儒将进中国一步一步推向统一。可以说,魏晋时期的统一是由这一时代的儒将共同完成。
[Abstract]:The Wei and Jin dynasties were a time of frequent war, and the martial arts were supposed to have a higher status. But the historical fact is that this period of martial people are often despised, social status is not high. Scribes have a relatively high social status and enjoy more qualifications and opportunities to serve as officials. The writer of this paper refers to the group of scribes and soldiers in Wei and Jin dynasties. This paper adopts the method of case study and group study to study Confucianism in Wei and Jin dynasties from the angle of division and unity. The limitation of the period of Wei and Jin was determined by this angle. At the beginning of the first year of Pingyuan (190), the end of the Han Dynasty split, and then the first year of Taikang (280 years) unified the Western Jin Dynasty. The first chapter is about Lu Xun's resistance to Shu. It mainly studies the reason why Sun Quan was chosen as commander in chief of the upper reaches and the relation between Yiling War and Sun Wu. The second chapter is Sima Yi, focusing on the conditions for Sima Yi to seize the military and political power of the Cao Wei Dynasty, and the relationship between Gao Pingling incident and the Wei and Jin dynasties. The third chapter is Xiangyang of Yanghu town, focusing on the reason why Emperor Jin Wu sent Yang Hu to guard Xiangyang, and the relationship between the early preparation of Yang Hu and the unification of Western Jin Dynasty. The fourth chapter is the group of Wei and Jin dynasties, the political ideal of "Unification", the relative concentration of origin distribution, and the common characteristics of this group. In the first three chapters, Luxun, Sima Yi and Yang Hu were chosen as the representatives of the Wei and Jin dynasties. Sun Wu could not establish a country without Lu Xun's victory in the battle of Yiling, Sima could not realize the change of Wei and Jin dynasties without Sima Yi, and the Western Jin Dynasty could not unify the whole country without the long-term management of Yang Hu in Xiangyang. From the end of the Han Dynasty to the three Kingdoms, to the Western Jin Dynasty, the Confucianism, represented by Lu Xun, Sima Yi and Yang Hu, will advance China step by step towards unification. It can be said that the unity of the Wei and Jin dynasties was completed by the Confucianism of this era.
【学位授予单位】:山西大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:K235

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 朱绍侯;;论吴蜀夷陵之战[J];军事历史研究;2016年02期

2 尤学工;翟士航;;中国古代社会对儒将认识的演变[J];军事历史研究;2015年05期

3 陈艳玲;;皇权继承危机与魏晋政治格局之形成[J];文史哲;2015年04期

4 陈奕玲;;魏晋南北朝文武分途的基础性研究——几个概念的辨析[J];唐都学刊;2012年01期

5 刘硕伟;;羊祜的三不朽[J];齐鲁文化研究;2011年02期

6 仇鹿鸣;;乡里秩序中的地方大族——汉魏时代的河内司马氏[J];中国史研究;2011年04期

7 李艳涛;;陆逊和孙权关系简论[J];苏州文博论丛;2010年00期

8 李晓宇;;“大一统”观念的起源及其流变[J];学海;2008年06期

9 周桂钿;;董仲舒政治哲学的核心——大一统论[J];中国哲学史;2007年04期

10 朱子彦;;论陆逊[J];史学月刊;2007年07期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 黄朴民;章丽琼;;羊祜《平吴疏》的战略决策思维[N];光明日报;2016年



本文编号:2200256

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2200256.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户2d2e8***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com